A peevish, grudging rancor against men has been one of the most unpalatable and unjust features of second- and third-wave feminism. Men’s faults, failings and foibles have been seized on and magnified into gruesome bills of indictment. Ideologue professors at our leading universities indoctrinate impressionable undergraduates with carelessly fact-free theories alleging that gender is an arbitrary, oppressive fiction with no basis in biology.Most men have been required to sit through indoctrination by "ideologue professors", trainers, officers, corporate human resources drones and others who have made dispensing feminist anger into a life's work.
Paglia continues...
In France, Italy, Spain, Latin America and Brazil, in contrast, many ambitious professional women seem to have found a formula for asserting power and authority in the workplace while still projecting sexual allure and even glamour. This is the true feminine mystique, which cannot be taught but flows from an instinctive recognition of sexual differences. In today’s punitive atmosphere of sentimental propaganda about gender, the sexual imagination has understandably fled into the alternate world of online pornography, where the rude but exhilarating forces of primitive nature rollick unconstrained by religious or feminist moralism.And then Paglia makes her key point, the one that will likely enrage some feminists:
Indeed, men are absolutely indispensable right now, invisible as it is to most feminists, who seem blind to the infrastructure that makes their own work lives possible. It is overwhelmingly men who do the dirty, dangerous work of building roads, pouring concrete, laying bricks, tarring roofs, hanging electric wires, excavating natural gas and sewage lines, cutting and clearing trees, and bulldozing the landscape for housing developments. It is men who heft and weld the giant steel beams that frame our office buildings, and it is men who do the hair-raising work of insetting and sealing the finely tempered plate-glass windows of skyscrapers 50 stories tall.
The modern economy, with its vast production and distribution network, is a male epic, in which women have found a productive role — but women were not its author. Surely, modern women are strong enough now to give credit where credit is due!Strong writing, coming from a university professor, social critic and self-described dissident feminist. What Paglia wrote needed to be said; let's hope others of her status have the clarity of thinking to agree, and build on the theme Paglia started in her essay.
Full essay linked here. A very worthwhile read.
17 comments:
I've always admired Paglia. She reminds me of vbspurs.
That essay came from a debate held on November 13. You can watch the whole thing or read the transcript here.
Warning: one of the debaters was Maureen Dowd; she is very, very hard to watch and listen to without wanting to pull your hair out. Or maybe hers.
I can barely stand reading Maureen Dowd. Watching her would be torture.
I clicked through to the debate transcript Lydia linked in her 1:07 comment.
The debate was called "Be it resolved, men are obsolete…"
Imagine the outrage if four men held the same event, debating whether women are obsolete.
The outcome was interesting. Polling the debate attendees found that 16% agreed with the premise before the debate, and 44% agreed with the premise after the debate.
Sexism lived large by people who see sexism behind every door, tree, and window.
Imagine the outrage if four men held the same event, debating whether women are obsolete.
Women will be indispensable so long as we need living, breathing wombs. Maureen Dowd wasted hers, so I guess we can dispense with her.
I think it's interesting to witness, on the one hand, a kind of naiveté about how the world works, in the form of Obama's foreign policy, which at it's core is a kind end of end of history, why don't we all just get along, and in the other hand, a doubling down on men are the problem to men are obsolete.
It doesn't add up.
It's a headache just to keep track of the quackery.
Haz, I have loved Paglia for a long time. Saw her speak @ UW where she eviscerated some Women Studies clones[or clowns]. To understand Paglia you have to hear her speak or write about her Italian upbringing. She came from a strong, patriarchal family where the men were hard working, righteous, kind and loving. Paglia is the classic lesbian who loves women but has never hated men, she actually prefers men to most women. She loves to bust balls w/ here auto mechanic. She says they don't know who she is, she's just that little dago ball busting lesbian. I prefer to read her than see her speak. But, when she speaks[Brian Lamb did a great 2 hour booknotes w/ her], you get more of the family and cultural background. She's a force of nature!
Ignorance is Bliss said...
Women will be indispensable so long as we need living, breathing wombs.
Women will be indispensable until someone develops a holodeck. Then the human race is doomed.
Sam Kinison spoke on the subject of how long we will need women. I won't repeat it here, but it is still true.
Sorry that my previous comment appears to credit the first quote to myself, when I was actually quoting El Pollo Raylan. My first attempt had a bad link, and when I reposted I copied the Ignorance is Bliss said... and lost the italics. At this point I give up and will not try to repost a corrected version.
Doesn't matter how eloquent Paglia is, most women take things like roads, bridges, the delivery system that keeps the supermarket shelves full, all of that for granted. They always have and they always will. After all, that's what men are for, to be useful drones.
If the above sounds hostile to women, it's not. Because if men weren't useful drones the world would fall apart and women implicitly acknowledge that fact by valuing a good provider above all in choosing a mate. But what he does to provide? Of little concern to her.
WHo cares? Bottom line: Silly women are still voting and screwing things up. Until they're out of politics things will only get worse.
A few crumbs thrown our way by a lesbian won't change anything.
Ya got me. Don't know what she's like. So I look. Pick one that might be interesting. PJ media talking about snobby artists. She has a new book about that.
She says children pay for art snobbiness in America, Glenn says that and she latches onto it and she energetically elaborately elaborates with extreme elaborations by pointing out school programs are cut because of distrust of phony art and now they say, "express yourself" and that's it.
We did that. Draw your home. (a psychological trick!) I was so careful to make the grass stand up straight and be properly mowed and trimmed. Later the teacher and somebody else examined the finished pictures one by one hanging there like clothes on a clothesline and moving along the row when the new person said to my teacher, Mrs Burger(bits), "I like this one because the blades of grass are irregular and going off in all directions." And I thought to myself, "Shit."
The other night I cooked a few steaks and prepared the plates with a friend who instinctively lined up the green beans into a neat pile and I said, "Don't line them up."
"Don't line them up?"
"No. Like this: *tumble a random Zen haystack* Lined up is too anal retentive." This, a reference to ass while preparing a plate for dinner.
Most men have been required to sit through indoctrination by "ideologue professors", trainers, officers, corporate human resources drones and others who have made dispensing feminist anger into a life's work.
Come on Michael. What nonsense. The sex "harassment" laws were made by male judges, in their all-consuming Puritan chivalry, which guys like the Comment Homies no doubt share.
I have always been a big Paglia fan. While she is wrong about her leftist ways, she is refreshingly honest (which is rare on the left).
Only 1 R&B post? We need at least 20!
Post a Comment