Monday, December 30, 2013

David Kirkpatrick, author of NYT Benghazi piece claiming no Al Qaeda involvement

If by Al Qaeda you mean the organization started by Bin Laden. No, the attack on the Benghazi consulate was carried out by locals. They are all well known around those parts. Their histories known. Nothing worthwhile to see here.



Nothing except the spectacle of a grown man fellating Hillary Clinton in public. It is unsightly and unbecoming a professional journalist. The effort falls far short of what is already known. Journalistic curiosity fails to cover why the Ambassador was ordered to that specific compound on that specific day and why the consulate was insufficiently protected. The answers to that still are wanting,  and further, no curiosity at all concerning the whereabouts of the most significant person in government, apparently, and we all know why. David Kirkkpatrick's own immobilizing patronizing racism.

But none of that matters. The report is already counterattacked all over the place, and the distraction has already served its dual purpose of another cyclical temporary squirrel for Obama, and simultaneously terrain preparation for Hillary Clinton. Look at this guy. This is my little sister, haunting me, haunting me again, her irrational ways so obvious. Say whatever you wish, it will not compute properly, she is occupied preparing the next attack.

Let's speak our own language and short circuit the prepared discussion as Ted Cruz does earlier, ask why this is coming up now after being roundly dismissed as irrelevant for so long even though we already know why, the answer does not matter, and while David Kirkpatrick or whoever formulates their answer if they care to, we'll be formulating the next line of damaging questions, observations, remarks no matter the response. That is how we talk nowadays, mutual understanding is not the aim.

Who cares if it was Al Qaeda, or offshoot, or rival, or nothing related at all,that is not the point. Hillary Clinton's own incompetency is the point, that is the reason why Hillary Clinton has over her a big fat spray painted X and this prime coat attempt is not going to stop the bleed through.

18 comments:

virgil xenophon said...

Superbly worded post, Chip--nothing more to add.

virgil xenophon said...

PS: I see you're on a roll this am. Slow-burning outrage at people lying thru their teeth and calmly daring you to call them on it will do that to a man..

Third Coast said...

If Kirkpatrick was "fellating" the Hildabeeste, that will be big news in the campaign. The National Enquirer should have been all over this.

Shouting Thomas said...

My Filipina girlfriend likes Hillary!

I cannot account for that.

The girlfriend doesn't agree with Hillary on anything, but said girlfriend thinks of Hillary as being experienced. Which would be an improvement over the half-black Messiah.

I'm not sure I agree with this logic. At what is the Guaranteed Next First Female President experienced?

edutcher said...

That they have to lie says it all.

bagoh20 said...

Chip's last point is THE point. It doesn't matter much who the attackers were. They certainly were not simply Youtube addicts. The men are dead, and the embassy is ashes. It was this administration's job to prevent that, but it seems pretty clear they not only didn't take the action needed and requested, but actually purposefully left it vulnerable and then lied about the disaster to the American people in loud, bold terms over and over.

I suppose if the State Department actually burned down the embassy themselves, that might be worse, but that's about the only way I can imagine it.

There is a question where "what difference now does it make" is valid, and that's in what the attackers call themselves. It changes nothing if they are Al Qaeda or not except to add a single drop to the tanker load of fail here.

bagoh20 said...

"At what is the Guaranteed Next First Female President experienced?"

Posing, lying, denying responsibility, and allowing assholes to embarrass her and the country.

So yea, she has a firm grip on the newly defined qualifications for the job.

sakredkow said...

Let's speak our own language and short circuit the prepared discussion as Ted Cruz does earlier, ask why this is coming up now after being roundly dismissed as irrelevant for so long even though we already know why, the answer does not matter

No matter when it came up you'd have a reason for saying that. It would never be okay with you. They can't win with you, ever.

"We already know why, the answer does not matter..."

Who are you, Pravda??

Aridog said...

virgil xenophon said...

Slow-burning outrage at people lying thru their teeth and calmly daring you to call them on it will do that to a man.

You just precisely stated my reason for quiting as a "Fed" and retiring early. Even when you call them on it they just tell another lie. You begin to doubt your own sanity, so you have to go.

sakredkow said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Aridog said...

Phx ... we all need to understand that no one in this administration is going to tell us the truth about Benghazi. That is why, for all extents and purposes, it doesn't matter anymore...you can never know the truth, and if you do you will be suppressed.

As I tried to point out at the very beginning of the reporting of the incident, they lied up front about who was notified of what and when. The presumption must have been that none of us with military and federal service backgrounds would notice. Hillary, Obama, Gen Dempsey, et al all knew within 15 minutes of the first attack. Period.

Several of us with background referred to the CRITICOMM system. Once they told the first whopper, there is no choice but to continue.

Christy said...

Great post, Chip. You can tell the Clintons are deeply involved by the careful parsing of words by the author (no journalist he) of the piece. Parsing is their trademark I've come to recognize, and I confess, respect just a little after 5 years of Obama. At their core I believe the Clintons value truth for they try to speak it and lie only when cornered. We can carefully examine their words and approximate the truth by noticing what they didn't say. Obama doesn't even try to be a truth teller.

ricpic said...

Frankly, the Left has nothing to fear. Any attack on Hillary will be labeled part of the mythical war on women by the MSM. Which in turn will freeze the Republican candidate. Watch the Republican do everything possible to disappear Benghazi. This of course assumes the Republicans will nominate one of their beloved fellow country clubbers. If, by some miracle, Cruz is the candidate all bets are off.

deborah said...

Chip:
"That is how we talk nowadays, mutual understanding is not the aim."

The average viewer knows this and feels powerless to do anything about it.

Who would be the ultimate Bullworthesque candidate against Hillary? One who would just say, 'what the fuck are you talking about?'

Unknown said...

Hillary is a woman and she has electrolytes.

The media insist you love her. She has electrolytes.

Lem said...

Wait a minute... The NYT talked to "known local" people that killed out ambassador?

Aren't we supposed maybe getting around to taking these "known local" people to justice?

I seem to remember Obama promising that.

Unknown said...

The left can manufacture sources and news. Whatever it takes for dear leader.

Aridog said...

Lem...the NYT pitches more bullshit that a manure spreader.

I assure you that the NYT were NOT on the recipients' list for the initial and subsequent CRITICOMM messages.