Wall Street Journal starts their article by applying their own biased spin by stating this latest reveal is the result of ratcheting up of complaints by Trump supporters due to Trump's legal team predicting Trump would be cleared by year as the investigation extends into 2018.
It's not possible for WSJ to start out saying Trump voters are flat sick and tired of Democrat's ridiculous dancing dog show and they're getting very sick and tired of them.
Andrew Weissman, the guy leading the probe's Paul Manafort and Rick Gates cases has his Party loyalty on full display, first by attending Hillary Clinton's election night party, and secondly by praising Sally Yates's efforts to thwart President Donald Trump in glowing reverent terms.
He's also given thousands of dollars to Democrat campaigns.
Ari Fleisher:
There are 2 reasons people attend a candidate’s victory party. 1) They’re cheering for the candidate to win. 2) They want a job/promotion if the candidate wins. Both reasons should disqualify Weissmann from investigating Trump.
Following WSJ view, I expect we'll be seeing more of this as Trump supporters continue to ratchet up the their complaints.
3 comments:
The thing is coming apart at the seams. Not only is there no real evidence of wrongdoing, but Swamp Thing and his hacks are showing themselves to be even more corrupt (and stupid) than anyone ever thought.
I get the distinct feeling Trump saw this happening all along.
The swamp has to swamp.
ITs been biased from the start. Why appoint Mueller if you want an "honest" investigation of anything involving Comey. The Two are best friends forever.
Post a Comment