Dr. David Spiegel:*
'The reason Paddock could kill so many people in a 10-minute span is that he had ready access to the means to do so,' Spiegel said. 'The real explanation,' he said, 'lies with guns and a culture that puts 'ridiculous firepower' in virtually anyone’s hands.'
'There’s nothing sick about him,' Spiegel said of Paddock. 'As a psychiatrist, I deeply resent the inference that anybody who does something like this is mentally ill. It’s untrue and deeply unfair to people with mental illness.'
linkNo mention of Paddock's father's history; no public discussion of Paddock's habits up until the time of the shootings. No siree, Hillary has told us what we should do to prevent what happened.
______________________
*The irony of a person's name: Spiegel means "mirror" in German. I believe there's a literary device called ____ when a character is named after some trait. What is it?
20 comments:
The father's history is particularly important because of both nature and nurture points of view.
Projection?
So, all those guys who served in the Army in all those wars just did it because they were put in a room full of guns. Somebody shooting at them, patriotism, had nothing to do with it.
And, when they went home, and hung their Brown Bess or Pennsylvania Long Rifle or Springfield 1858 rifle-musket or Sharps carbine above the mantle, it made them slaughter everyone in the family.
Riiiight.
Spiegel's inference is that anyone with access to guns would do what Paddock did. The person becomes the tool for the guns.
This guy and Harvard Law's Laurence Lessig and his 5-step plan to get Hillary in office really have me doubting elite university wisdom.
I'm greatly offended that Dr. Spiegel is inferring a medical diagnosis of a patient without actually seeing the patient.
What a jackass.
I am going to go with Spoonerism. Or maybe Onomatopoeia. Nah, kidding, unless guy is gassy.
Verisimilitude - no, that's not it. I got nothing.
As usual, there is partial truth present. The killer did have ready access to the means to do so, as do those who use knives, stones, hands, feet, pillows, trucks and fertilizer bombs. The motive, drive, desire or intent to kill, wound and terrorize so many people in a 10-minute span is another matter.
That the killer wanted to, planned on, prepared for and committed to such an act is where attention needs to be paid. .
Charactonym
Aptronym
Thank God for the Founding Fathers!
With 300 million firearms in private hands, and probably 10 trillion rounds of ammo out and about, I think that if guns were the problem we would know about it by now.
Emotional spew with an impressive* credential attached.
These expensive diplomas that people killed themselves to get have decreasing value. Now anytime I see an author/ity touting his/her Stanford/Ivy degree I pretty much know I'm going to be served word salad with liberal smug dressing. It will be unwholesome empty intellectual calories and a complete waste of my time.
Dickensian?
When a name reflects character trait, like D[e]r Fancy Spiegel Nofunhouse Germanmirror. Dr. Blame Projector Rage Deflector. Person Who Is Triggered by Guns.
Speaking of which, anyone know the latest on the security guard? Disparu! Strange.
I believe there's a literary device called ____ when a character is named after some trait. What is it?
sixtygritism?
LOL! Of coarse!
Ok, I cheated. I looked it up.
link
Aptronym
Soft of like an odd ball Russian artist named Artzybasheff?
I had to look it up too, and worse yet, didn't see it so clearly defined as SixtyGritism until the above mention, which was read after pushing send on the Russian addition!
Ok - guns and gun culture. Who pushes guns and gun culture more than ANYONE?
Bueller?
The NRA? Why.... No. Not the NRA.
It's Hollywood.
____________________________________
Anytime the path looks bad for leftists, they shut it all down.
Uh huh. Mental illness called, says it's all offended and deeply hurt. Suicidal.
Behind every bad gun, is a finger.
Post a Comment