Thursday, October 13, 2016

internet trolls

Boy, there sure are a lot of them. What does a paid Clinton troll look like, and how can you tell immediately? By the remarkable vapidity to their posts.

They're offensive and miserable and they can never manage to say anything substantive. They are not paid a living wage, rather they're paid pennies per comment so they make a lot of them that all added up signify nothing at all.

This is seen on an item on FOX news site about FBI agents unanimous in disagreeing with Comey's decision to not recommend Hillary Clinton for prosecution after delivering a litany of federal crimes she committed, itself signifying nothing. The entire report reiterates what is already well known and internalized and not wort the internet space its printed on. Since FBI agents haven't actually done anything noticeable it's all sturm und drang. Tell us what FBI agents do about their collective disgust and that might be newsworthy.

Back to what a troll looks like, and they too can be simply ignored because there is nothing of substance there, they look exactly like this:


The dope opens an account twelve days ago and frenetically makes 2,600 posts, goes back and "likes" himself. That is, masturbates on online and splooges all over the place. You can tell because nobody bothered to share a single post. 




This is what the Democrat party brings us. This is their contribution to discussion. 




20 comments:

chickelit said...

Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly Soros brings death (paraphrasing 2 Corinthians 7:10).

chickelit said...

I'm glad that Trump named George Soros in his last debate. I hope he brings him up again with more focus. He could also take a swipe at the Koch Bros. This is where the buck$ come from for internet trolls.

rcommal said...

Are you all worried about the base defecting? You should not be so worried. They are not so doing, and nor will they so do.

That ain't happening. Full stop. Period.

That said, it's entirely possible that, on account of choices, the election is lost.

---

Ain't nuttin' I can say that'd matter, anyhoo, btw, on point, right now, anyway.

Jeez. At least I acknowledge the uselessness of me.

edutcher said...

At $15/hr, those guys are way overpaid.

Sixty Grit said...

His hat is gay.

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

My go-to presumption for that type of "remarkable vapidity" in commenting -- obsessive and hostile -- is not "paid Clinton troll" but rather an idle, lonely, rudderless person with some sort of mental condition.

bagoh20 said...

" idle, lonely, rudderless person with some sort of mental condition."

Yea, but my mom thinks I'm cool.

ricpic said...

OT - Insightful column by Victor David Hanson titled Medieval America. Can be accessed at Town Hall. Are we going back into the dark ages? You betcha.

"Are you all worried about the base defecting?"

No. The base won't defect. My worry is that the many women who were wavering between Clinton and Trump have now been scared off Trump by the locker room banter October surprise.

edutcher said...

No, the women who were "wavering" have probably heard worse than "the locker room banter".

Women who have to make the household decisions can be as level-headed as men.

bagoh20 said...

The thing that worries me is that this crap always works for the Dems. A lot of undecided just sit and wait for the October surprise like dogs waiting for dinner. As soon as it's laid down they lap it up and make their decision. They base it all on the last scandal they hear. Waiting to see what the last scandal is is the very reason they are still undecided. They already know the candidates. They are looking for an excuse to decide, but not until they have to.

Methadras said...

Well, there will be an email pretty soon that outlines Hillary/Soros creating an Indian troll center in Bangladesh somewhere where warehouses of these trolls are ensconced.

edutcher said...

PS Interesting graphic I saw

If women are so offended by Trump's language, who bought 80 million copies of "50 Shades Of Gray"?

Rabel said...

theqthatrulezu

Just testing. Please ignore.

chickelit said...

@edutcher: 50 Shades was just words!

AllenS said...

Rabel, how on earth can we disregard theqthatrulezu?

Rabel said...

A good question, Allen. I wondered what google knew about Chip's troll so I put his user name in search and there were 0 results. An unrelated question then occurred to me - what if I put the name in the comments? would google search find it then?

Answer is no. Now if Chip was to put the name in the post itself (and not in an image) would google find it then? Enquiring minds and all.

Rabel said...

Chip were, not was. Apologies to Chick.

Rabel said...

Obviously, I have too much free time.

Rabel said...

Also, I'm pretty sure that the search engines are using alien technology. Whether they gave it to us or we found it in the ship at Area 51 is an open question.

That also explains why my search did not find brother qwhatthefuckever after I put in on the open net in my comment. An advanced technology would not allow comment sections.

chickelit said...

TOP had a commenter who fit the profile of paid Hillary trolls. Shiloh (I called him Shilho) only showed up prior to elections (2012 and 2016) and mostly parroted DNC talking points. Inga was another.