And which experts would those be, the ones with their fingers on the pulse of America and their ears to the ground at Gallaudet?
Stop reading right here at the very beginning where the first and second sentence are so woefully wrong.
Trump says repeatedly, it's a thing that he does, "The midterms are not about me. *whispers aside* they're about me." Then he elaborates on the midterms being about him and his programs and aims.
What's so hard about that? Strained of comprehension?
These prognosticators and writers are in for another huge shock.
We saw Washington Times' experts in shock and actually weeping on t.v., having mis-foretold so egregiously. And so embarrassingly discredited ignominiously now they go to their so-called experts again and dutifully relate their report.
Rather than a pinched description of politics imagined and written by Democrats for Democrats, a muddled picture at best and intended to influence and never to inform, tell me of your home world, Usul. That would be a lot better. What color is your sky? How many moons?
2 comments:
Dinan is one of the resident NeverTrumpers at the Times.
A bit of schizophrenia there; some strongly Trump.
I get your Gallaudet reference. My teacher and I pronounce it differently, but probably neither of us pronounce it correctly.
Post a Comment