“A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him, saying, ‘You are mad; you are not like us.'” ― St. Anthony the Great
Drip, drip, drip...Anybody want to start a pool when the weight of evidence, or at least an act of God, impels her to want to spend more time with her "family"?
wow. she should be losing. Easily.
I don't want to mock aging. Aging sucks for all of us.But that really is what it looks like when you unplug the botox machine.
The doctor going everywhere with her seems to have disappeared. I don't mean that they had him killed... I mean he's not at arms length of her... it appears.
"What's wrong with her?"Nothing. She's winning. Stonewalling tactics have always worked for her, so why should she change?
As I say, this is why she may not make it to the debates.Shouting Thomas said...What's wrong with her?Nothing. She's winning. Stonewalling tactics have always worked for her, so why should she change?Even though the media is on her side and the polls are phony, and that makes winning tough for the opposition, any opposition, Drudge is on her. Just as he nailed the One True Ted, he'll nail her.The whole world reads Drudge.So, Shout, I really doubt she's winning. Maybe in the network and newspaper polls, but they have an 8 point skew built in.Lem said...The doctor going everywhere with her seems to have disappeared. I don't mean that they had him killed... I mean he's not at arms length of her... it appears.Nice distinction. With better than 50 in the body bag, it's no sure thing what happened to the good doctor.I'm wondering if Willie got a little nervous having such a strong, fine-looking, blackamoor touching his wife, even if it's in name only. She is his proppity, 'cordin' to the Napoleonic Code.Of course that could also make a very good case that something has happened to him.
Where and how Drudge manages to come up with the goofiest and most damaging photographs of H. Clinton is one of the greatest mysteries. He must have people across the world sending him the nastiest crap they have all day long. Everybody looks a million times worse by high dynamic range imagery. You don't need to blend a stack of photographs either. In photoshop and using raw files, increase black, increase white, increase mid tones, increase contrast, increase saturation. Go through every slide bar on every adjustment possible and increase everything, boom, every portrait is worse.Bad show. But point taken, the woman's a mess.
If there were a "none of the above box" it would give both major candidates a run for their money. Please don't judge me. If one is objective you know "none of the above" would pull ~20-25%. Then "none of the above" could appear on the debate stage. Just draw some random person willing to go up there and be "none of the above." This election is devolving into a total clusterfuck. Why not go all in!
I think that's why the Libertarians still think they might be a blip on the radar; it was what impelled them to back the One True Ted.Thing is, there's no such scenario in our electoral system.The parliamentary system gets them all the time.That's how you end up with consuls named Bonaparte and chancellors named Schicklgruber.
Post a Comment