AllenS Foto Funnies:

 

"Hillary Clinton: Women Who Support Trump Are ‘Publicly Disrespecting Themselves’"

Via Drudge:  "When I see women doing that (supporting Trump), I think why are they publicly disrespecting themselves? Why are they opening the door to have someone say that about them in their workplace? In a community setting? Do they not see the connection there?" Clinton said in an interview on AM Joy.

She added that the fight against sexism is ongoing, even for women. She also pointed out that, while more women voted for her, she lost white women's vote. However, she said progress was still made because she won more votes from white women than former President Barack Obama did.

"We had such a public and still an ongoing movement to expand civil rights. Again, I'm proud of the progress, but we still have a lot of problems we have to confront," Clinton told Joy Reid during the interview.

(Link to more)

Maybe it will work next time...

I drew this.

Hillary's Gender Problem

[This post was drafted but never posted. I changed all the tenses to the past]

Rolling Stone boasted The Year of the Woman: How Women Will Take Down Donald Trump

Historically, slightly more women voted than men. But, if older polls were believed, Hillary may have had more of a gender problem with men than Trump had with women [still looking for more recent polling data]. The reasons why some women disliked Trump was done to death by the media. But note that the media rarely (if ever) talked or wrote about the origin of Hillary's gender problem.

The big reason why I disliked Hillary? She talked incessantly about advancing the causes of women and girls. For this reason, she could not seriously be taken as someone who represented the interest of all Americans. I am the father of both a son and a daughter and I am familiar with social biases against boys and for girls. Hillary never raised boys. Trump has raised both sons and daughters and is more trustworthy regarding the welfare of boys and girls.

[Added] An example of what evil women do to boys:

 h/t: exiledonmainstreet

Politico: Hillary’s Hit List

There was a special circle of Clinton hell reserved for people who had endorsed Obama or stayed on the fence after Bill and Hillary had raised money for them, appointed them to a political post or written a recommendation to ice their kid’s application to an elite school. On one early draft of the hit list, each Democratic member of Congress was assigned a numerical grade from 1 to 7, with the most helpful to Hillary earning 1s and the most treacherous drawing 7s. The set of 7s included Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), as well as Reps. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Baron Hill (D-Ind.) and Rob Andrews (D-N.J.).  Yet even a 7 didn’t seem strong enough to quantify the betrayal of some onetime allies.

When the Clintons sat in judgment, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) got the seat closest to the fire. Bill and Hillary had gone all out for her when she ran for Senate in 2006, as had Obama. But McCaskill seemed to forget that favor when NBC’s Tim Russert asked her whether Bill had been a great president, during a  Meet the Press debate against then-Sen. Jim Talent (R-Mo.) in October 2006. “He’s been a great leader,” McCaskill said of Bill, “but I don’t want my daughter near him.” 

McCaskill regretted her remark instantly; the anguish brought her “to the point of epic tears,” according to a friend. She knew the comment had sounded much more deliberate than a forgivable slip of the tongue. So did Hillary, who immediately canceled a planned fundraiser for McCaskill. A few days later, McCaskill called Bill Clinton to offer a tearful apology. He was gracious, which just made McCaskill feel worse. After winning the seat, she was terrified of running into Hillary Clinton in the Capitol. “I really don’t want to be in an elevator alone with her,” McCaskill confided to the friend.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/hillary-clinton-hit-list-102067#ixzz43aMPq1NL 
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

Hillary, review

There's nothing in the pipe so I thought I'd just stick this random item here. Nothing special. It is a comment to a post about Republicans filing more lawsuits to shakedown information from Hillary Clinton. I don't know, its length and its detail suggest something copy and pasted, also, it says reposting for Jim. It's copy/pasted again without format and this is how it turns out. It's also the sort of thing the guy would want spread around so I stole it.

History Builder14 minutes ago
Reposting For Jim,
Here is a little history lesson for you young voters on your princess:
The Clinton Diaries
When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and intimidation, she couldn’t even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress. This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.
Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood – both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration. Next she chose Janet Reno – husband Bill described her selection as “my worst mistake.” Some may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco, Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Husband Bill allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her selection. When a little probing led to the discovered of Ms. Guanier’s radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from consideration.
Apparently a slow learner, husband Bill allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury Department. Her selections went well: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.
Many younger votes will have no knowledge of “Travelgate.” Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton friend Harry Thompson – and the White House Travel Office refused to comply. She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.
Still not convinced of her ineptness, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of White House security. When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.
Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in charge of the #$%$ eruption” and scandal defense. Some of her more notable decisions in the debacle was:
She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms. Jones.
She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special Prosecutor. After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying about and later admitting his affairs.
Hillary’s devious game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.
Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, “I do not recall,” “I have no recollection,” and “I don’t know” a total of 56 times while under oath.
After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and artwork that she had stolen.
What a swell party – ready for another four or eight year of this type low-life mess?
Now we are exposed to the destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the “pay to play” schemes of the Clinton Foundation – we have no idea what shoe will fall next. But to her loyal fans - “what difference does it make?”
Electing Hillary Clinton president would be like granting Satan absolution and giving him the keys to heaven!

That sounded like somebody who was keeping close track of items placed in the Book of Life and taking special interest in damaging entries. I imagined Trump springing some of these items in debate and the dismissiveness required to overcome them. Just as Trump enemies reveal items of his own egregious past and imagine the dismissiveness required to overcome them.

And I got excited.

And just when I felt great about seeing all this garbage dragged out, by anyone, really I don't care who, it would just be so great to see, right when I'm there pleasant in my daydream the same poster has a new message a detailed account of Benghazi beginning:

And she gave the coordinates to Christopher Stephens outpost to jihadists to have him killed because he was going to reveal her arms sales to revolutionary groups.

And there went the whole thing.

Women abandon Hillary in NH

Hillarys gender chips just took a big hit.

There's a special place in hell... RT @CBSPolitics: "More than 4 out 5 women aged 18-29 voted for @BernieSanders" pic.twitter.com/1TH8I4DKIj"

— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) February 10, 2016

Hillary Clinton Drudge style

So it's come to this. Drudge publishes the most disturbing photograph available that shows how Drudge feels whenever Drudge see her, one that would be carefully avoided if possible. Hillary Clinton, Drudge style.

This photograph is both terrible and wonderful at the same time, technically photographically and as art.

Everything wrong at once as if planned by master technicians.  

* The lighting, right off, is the worst for this subject. A screen in front of the light source can cast interesting patterns such as window shades in film noir, and in other cases, shadow screen or not, the pattern of light and shadow falling on the subject can add to the interest, it can elevate the photography or it can be a disaster by falling on all the wrong places and creating unwanted contrasts where they are not helpful. Compare with an interesting example how shadows can contribute significantly:

That looks painted on (hairline). 

* Awkward pose. This was caught at a bad moment. It looks like her neck hurts.

* Bad expression. Again, snapped at the worst moment of all possible moments when teeth are displayed as a rodent and the shape of the mouth combines with her cheek lines and chin lines, it looks like Egyptian hieroglyphic V-26, a spool of netting twine, except hers has teeth in the middle. 

I drew this because I couldn't find a good one.

pronounced: 'ḏ "edge." 

* Bad makeup. She, her team, does much better than this every day. This makeup, along with the lighting, looks purposefully ghoulish like a dancer for a Michael Jackson Triller video. 

* Bad hair day. Right before touchup coloring. Her hair looks destroyed. Would make a good "before" picture for Wen hair products. You catch someone at the end of a busy day and this happens.

* Terrible, terrible wardrobe chosen for its sackcloth texture, fringe edged burlap chic. Brown wooden beads for necklace. Her stylist does this. She wears open weave fabric jackets  but this appears extreme in its down style. 

* Monotone coloration throughout, hair, face, and clothing as if all life has been used up and squeezed out and in dire need of blood and desperate for brains to gnaw on. A makeup artist could not have been more convincing without going overboard painting arrows with shadows on her face to the only thing left still working, the overlain upper and lower incisors. Monotone is not necessarily bad, most spray paint their whole face to even out blotches but this is terrible with natural and unnatural shadows adding grotesquely. 

This photograph is carefully chosen from hundreds similar for being the best of the worst, the most disturbing of all, for that reason good art and very mean spirited dirty politics.  

A cartoon so annoying it must be pushed behind a wall.  

An item of interest from within the vast American catchbasin. The cartoon inspired by a cartoon inspired by a cartoon inspired from an item on the Hill (with auto play) I read this morning then forgot about, except inspired is too lofty a word for any of this. None of it, not one bit of it is inspired.  Found it again right off by search [hillary, desperation, chelsea]. The premise of the article at the Hill is; Chelsea used to be such a nice girl, Mommy's little girl that shows Hillary's softer side, now on the attack. I cannot bother searching previous Chelsea attacks to dispute or confirm their premise. The attack centering on agitating about Bernie Sanders intention to dismantle Medicare cannot be made by Hillary for being too undeniably disingenuous, too ridiculous because everyone knows Bernie would replace with single payer, so Chelsea is set off to make the notably stupid distraction for her, one that says to people watching the change in behavior is desperation more than anything real about Bernie and Medicare.

I am a real person

Google it and see what happens ["i am a real person"]

So claims Hillary Clinton. 

Joke's on you. You'd have to listen to her yourself answer John Dickerson on Face the Nation. You'd have to listen to her cackle first. You'd have to endure her scathing sharp aggressive voice. And worse, you'd have to pay attention to Hillary.

National Review ridicules.

Daily Beast indulges her lying about her server and dismissing criticism. Has video.

Real Clear Politics dishes it straight with video.

Talking Points Memo deals it straight with video.

lit like bic

Song by Rae Sremmurd, cannot be played here. Too bad. It fits the rave. The music high flying drug addled rave. The thing I love about this photo of Hillary is her gibbon like swinging good time, her movement through space, her excellent balance with well weighted hips. She looks like a blast, a blasted cackling blast. Lit like a lighthouse.

That tossed and tumbled carefree look takes hours of drinking to achieve.

I wish they didn't add those yellow words. Imagine being her guard. Imagine being her and having state guards imposed. They don't like each other, she a carefree spirit as we see and they all work and serious focus so we're told. Respect for each other doesn't exist.

How dare you,

Journalist, ask an old puffed up ironclad dotard an actual question and challenge her faltering acuity. You just know your place, Young Man, how about that?

Ever since the fateful day of watching the video "Shining Times part 1," a video I like very well and watched several times about Sam Arnold's restaurant in Morrison built as authentic fort and his pride that he expresses in hosting economic Summit of Eight, and how right off the bat at the beginning of the video Sam's comparing the arrival of Clintons as royalty I felt shame about someone I deeply respect feeling so great and accomplished about something so wrong as that. Then Hillary exiting the vehicle waving as British royalty does grates irritatingly and that sealed my lasting disgust. Ever since that day I felt shame.

This is who Democrats will inflict upon us all, Republican or not, because they are Democrat and only because they are Democrat, there is no other reason than that, and that's not a good enough reason.

So I'm inflicting her back upon you.

Without actually bothering with it myself. Truth is, this clip has been presented to me at least a dozen times and I haven't watched one single time. On t.v. and online. Because of Sam Arnold's restaurant. Two seconds in BLAM gone. Over and over and over and that is how much she impresses other people negatively. They're shocked at her inability to behave as authentic human and they are tired of her insulated style and her bulletproof wardrobe.

Shhhh Go Fund, Clinton Secret Oppo Project

*whispers* Clinton Secret Oppo Project. Opposition against her, not for her.

How secret can it be?  Go Fund me, started by *whispers* Charles C. Johnson. That's the bit that's circled up there, his name. Someone else did that. Originally I thought it is the Little Green Footballs guy, but this is a different *whispers* Charles Johnson. For a little secret opposition description, here's Gawker's take on this here Charles Johnson. Buggers, I forgot to whisper.

Presently it's up to $635.00 accrued from 21 people in two days. $30.00 a piece. Not bad. The goal is a meager $40,000.

Cute. The thing is any number of Clinton's own opposition research operation resisting his opposition can write a check for Johnson's total amount and more on a whim and not even feel it. Johnson anxiously provides a long meandering proposal and ersatz prospectus but doesn't say anything. 

I need $40,000 to hire private eyes, pick up the material, run the requisite stupidly expensive tests, and produce a high production quality video. 

And.

Yes, this is vague (because we don’t want to tip off the Clintons to what we’re up to) and no, it's not illegal. (I checked with five different lawyers.) 

Now that’s a lot of money—

Charles you're silly. And it is not a lot of money. But the thing I really want to get across is you cannot just take a photo and apply an oil paint filter to it. The filter doesn't know where the brush strokes go.

Here. Like this. I'll do this as we go.

Random Hillary Photo nicked form Google Images and cropped severely.

Filters from Photoshop menu, Oil Paint from Filter menu.  

This new window opens on top of all the other windows. The sliders are moved to adjust the effects this way and that until you manage something approximate to oil painting. 

Or does it?

It just randomly makes brush mark distortions. Anyone who has painted knows that doesn't work. The marks will run with the apples of the cheeks, with the plumpness of the lips, in agreement with the lines on the forehead and around the eyes. Think of Vincent Van Gogh where every single thick daub of paint conveys some effect of light. As if finger-painted. It doesn't have to be refined but the movement of the brush strokes must make sense. Otherwise you have a mess.

Let's take the same original and smudge it around with smudge tool as if we were painting, just push color around a little bit all over and see if that makes a better oil painting. Nothing fancy, no tiny brushes, nothing tedious but this is the First Lady you know, we cannot just go completely jacking around, but even with smudges as kindergarden children we can do better than Photoshop's own oil painting filter.

Hillary gives presser explaining why we should trust her use of private email server while holding high public office

Hillary's Book Signing Rules.

In which we ridicule policy and the individual at the same time. 

* Your wristband provides access to the 4th floor signing line, but does not  guarantee any certain spot in the line
* Please purchase your book for the signing at the cash register. You will be handed your book on the 4th floor.
* 1 book per person, 1 wristband per person. NO exceptions.
* ALL PERSONAL ITEMS will be checked in the 2nd floor. You may claim your bag once you exit the signing.
* The only items permitted on the 4th floor are a wallet, cell phone, and/or small, personal camera
* There will be a security checkpoint on the 3rd Floor. Once you are cleared and enter the 4th floor, you are not permitted to exit until your book is signied.
* She will not be personalizing the book or signing memorabilia. NO posed photography with the author.
* We strongly recommend consuming food or beverages and using restrooms prior to entering the store. If you must exit the line, you will lose your space.

Thank you for you understanding please enjoy.

Oh, don't thank me. I do not have any of that understanding nor enjoyment. 

There is a page 2. but it appears to be fraudulent. Funny as h-e-double police sticks, but fraudulent. Page 3 in the comments. Surely you can think of some good rules yourself. 

Truth revolt. org.   http://tinyurl.com/kqgtruu

See? This is what I meant way back there at the 420 festival a few blocks from my home. Easy enough to go there and participate but they had me walk an extra two blocks to snake my way through barriers when all they had to do was allow me to step through a gap right there at the logical spot that was unnecessarily guarded. I decided at that point not to participate due to layered ridiculous rules. I copped a bad attitude. Then I observed the person of color allow access through the gap for other persons of color. So after all that the rules really are flexible, but not for me. I yelled out my protest from a distance, in public. And that breaks another rule. A rule of my class that cringes with embarrassment for yelling in public. And yelling at people, service people at that, a woman besides, it is unacceptable. But there I am yelling anyway. That's how cross I was at ridiculous rules that would have me walking extra blocks. Yet everyone else found that perfectly acceptable and had a great time celebrating. Celebrating what?  Freedom! The freedom for doing something they should have had freedom of doing all along, and in a society that brags about its vaunted freedoms. Ew, I get cross all over again.

And you know what? While I'm on it, here's another thing. My home, home on the range was cloudy all day today. All day! And not a deer or antelope in sight. I have had it with all this false advertisement. 

1st floor, 2nd floor, and now you're locked into it, 3rd floor, 4th floor. Jesus Christ what a hassle just for a book. Four floors for a book signing! Who would put up with that crap? What kind of personality tolerates that? I do not want to be anywhere near them. 

Politico's Maggie Haberman tweeted the list of guidelines, she being one of the first in line. That is who would brook such nonsense. For a story, I suppose.

Planet Baggage

New York Times magazine needs help with their Photoshop so I volunteered.

There is a galaxy of scandals depending on how nit-picky you are about it. Listing them means grading them by importance and grading a politicians scandals by importance makes one look and sound like a ruminating drunk, a political crackpot.

That works in reverse too. Mention one scintilla of support for political dynastically-minded family and at this point you self-identify as malevolent political crackpot.