Haven't seen it.
The article is crap with a lot more crap photos, crap tweets and crap opinions. Read it if you want.
The site does not allow comments because they know they and their readers are all full of crap.
Meanwhile on sensible sites with sensible readers you'll find sensible and amusing comments.
6 comments:
When I saw viral, I thought somebody saw Brother Bret's hand up the Short Shortstop's skirt or Gorsuch was giving the Wise Latina a grab.
Notorious looks like the voices are coming in loud and clear.
Those two tall white Christian male bookends may turnout to be Trump's best accomplishment. Although I doubt either will be as reliably conservative as Justice Thomas.
From the look on those faces around her I would guess she crapped her pants, again.
Only in leftwinger corruptocrat America is Kavanaugh considered a rapist, and Bill Clinton isn't.
Sure, we have no way of knowing how the feminist icon feels about an accused sexual predator sitting on the highest court of the land, but RBG's feminist credentials might suggest that she's on the side of the women everywhere who opposed Kavanaugh's nomination.
No, Dickin' this time it isn't a consideration of rape, it's more insidious. The label she with "no way of knowing" is cleverly hanging on Kavanaugh with her verbal side eye in this delivery, sent without using his name, is "an accused sexual predator" which Bill Clinton is, many times over, in addition to being a rapist.
I'm wondering what drives the author to think and write like this, focused on "sides" and icons, while valuing one kind of credential over another. Is is a deep desire to belong?
It reminds me of religious fervor.
Post a Comment