It's two pieces of literature preserved on a single Middle Kingdom papyrus. It is 214 lines of hieroglyphs on a scroll that was cut up into eighteen pages. The first two of those pages are the end portion of instruction of some vizier to his children. One of the instructions mentions a man named Kagemni, apparently one of his children who becomes a vizier himself. Then there's a blank page and the rest of the papyrus is devoted to the instruction of another vizier named Ptahotep. These viziers were like mini kings themselves. They controlled vast stretches of land, and everything that happens on them, nomes, such as feudal baronies. These were very important people, way up there on the pecking order, and their behavior had to be exemplary so they produced these instructions, maxims to live by very much like Confucius and Machieveli together.
They're boring as hell.
But what is interesting about them is something Deb noticed. If you choose to bother with it, you'll see similarities here and there with Jewish and Christian sacred books and you'll start to wonder just how much of the old testament has its source in the early Jewish enslavement. These stories, histories, philosophies, proverbs and psalms came from somewhere. What we see is a kind of syncretism. They took the best of what was around them and claimed it for their own. Blended the best into their own culture. And then under another period of slavery their culture began falling apart, dissipating into the larger and stronger culture so their priests re-worked their collected writings and created for themselves an historic national hero by amalgamating the feats and the history of several biblical characters into one. David. Do you honestly believe it was David who killed Goliath? The septuagint leaves traces of another name. The priests weren't 100% careful in their redactions. And they were using scrolls, you can't just flip back through pages. Nor use the computer's "find" feature. It's impossible to keep track of every detail. Do you honestly think David wrote all of the psalms? The same songs appear elsewhere in other languages predating David.
The Egyptians are doing the same thing here. Within the works they are claiming origin in an earlier dynasty, an earlier era, to give their new work back then the authority of being classic, while the style and the language, the phrasing, the usages, pegs the work at late Middle Kingdom.
Fine. We'll go along with your propaganda just to see how you said things over there and back then. Because we're curious how you got on.
This first bit exists in only one copy while the Ptahotep portion exists in several other copies. The first portion contains four maxims, and the second portion contains a long introduction and thirty-six maxims, and then a long conclusion. Both are difficult of comprehension in places and translations are uncertain.
In the modern book, this goes on for sixty-five pages.
That's a lot of pages for pedantic instructions. Kind of like living on Air Force Bases, rules all over the place. Every minute of the day. Every building you go into. For everything. Including washing your car and cutting your lawn, and cleaning your windows, and rolling up your garden hose. What a drag. Being a viziers son, being a courtier, was a total drag. We know that by all their stinking rules.
5 comments:
If you choose to bother with it, you'll see similarities here and there with Jewish and Christian sacred books and you'll start to wonder just how much of the old testament has its source in the early Jewish enslavement. These stories, histories, philosophies, proverbs and psalms came from somewhere.
It would figure some of those lessons were learned somewhere and slavery would be a long, hard school.
Do you honestly think David wrote all of the psalms?
There's an extant theory that David had what would amount to an ad agency, trying to make him look as good as possible.
The priests weren't 100% careful in their redactions.
Boy, does that sound familiar. The world never changes, does it? That's why history and the Bible and Shakespeare will always be relevant, DWM be damned.
Yeah right, the Jews got a lot of wisdom from the Egyptians. What wisdom? The Old Testament is such a giant leap forward from the static ant world of Egypt that it isn't even funny.
They took the best of what was around them and claimed it for their own. Blended the best into their own culture. And then under another period of slavery their culture began falling apart, dissipating into the larger and stronger culture so their priests re-worked their collected writings and created for themselves an historic national hero by amalgamating the feats and the history of several biblical characters into one. David. Do you honestly believe it was David who killed Goliath? The septuagint leaves traces of another name. The priests weren't 100% careful in their redactions. And they were using scrolls, you can't just flip back through pages. Nor use the computer's "find" feature. It's impossible to keep track of every detail. Do you honestly think David wrote all of the psalms? The same songs appear elsewhere in other languages predating David.
Push me out of the box why don't you? Yes, I honestly believed it was David who killed Goliath. For years, decades, even half a century I honestly believed it was David who killed Goliath. I still want to believe it was David who killed Goliath.
What I know to be true is this:
Sometimes I'm the the one who feels a song in my heart and sometimes despair or injustice I'm experiencing feels so strong I need the words of another to help me express it. Sometimes I have the strength, conviction, faith and wherewithal to take on something or someone large, sometimes I'm intimidated by the bluster, lies and blatant aggression of those who seem powerful and intimidating. Sometimes I make a decision and hit the mark head on with my action and sometimes I'm seduced by something that looks really good from a distance. Sometimes I manipulate events for an outcome that will give me what I want.
And sometimes I'm overwhelmed by the sorrow.
Those old authors and writers knew how to tell a story, and it matters not a whit whether the event described happened exactly as written, as those types of events continue to happen all around on a daily basis.
Back when Jewish history was first being recorded by Moses, the story he put down for posterity involved him questioning Yahweh about a plan Moses wasn't sure he wanted to do; with Yahweh, the great I Am Who I AM, questioning him in return by asking him "What do you have in your hand Moses?"
That's the question that comes to all of us, whether we're experiencing the peace of a garden, or the toxic mess of media and online drama. What to you have in your hand?
I'm choosing to hold on to the belief that David really took on Goliath with what he had in his hand and his pouch. I also like believing the story that has The One whom David believed in choosing him to be king over all of his older and more handsome brothers, because (according to King James'rendition) the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.
I raised the two SonsM while holding that belief, with what I also believe to be a good outcome.
Very well said, MamaM.
I accept the David/Goliath legend and am not bothered by whether it's factual since it's being repeated in many forms every day all over the world. I like the way you put it. I'm choosing to hold on to the belief that David really took on Goliath with what he had in his hand and his pouch.
Thank you Dad Bones. ChipA's thoughts and the glyphs he had in his hand were the impetus I needed to go down that path!
Post a Comment