From the Crazy Days and Nights Blog (Hat tip to Vox Popoli)
This is the holy grail. This is what is on the horizon for some actors/producers and directors that will ruin them for all time. Until two weeks ago, I would have thought the chances for anything leaking from this was zero. People kept their mouths shut before even when the feds were questioning lots of people. The thing is though, lots of those people lied to the feds. Some were granted immunity and still lied. Why? Going to jail for lying to the government gets you Martha Stewart time and a book deal. Telling the truth gets you jail for a long time and no career or friends when you get out.
Can you imagine a place where Hollywood types and rich executives from around the world can gather in one place and have sex with underage boys and girls without any interference from any governments or parents? Yeah, well there was such a place. There probably is a replacement somewhere. The problem is in finding it. When people are flying in from different corners of the globe, it can be tough. When your only choice before was to fly in a private plane to a private island, people knew where it was.
I think there is some shady stuff going down in Joe Francis Land, but nothing like the hundreds of teen boys and girls that were raped and abused and forced to be with men for weeks and months on end.
Apparently with all types of local governments looking into sexual assaults and rapes committed by Hollywood people coming into the light, the situation on the island they all thought they had carefully extricated themselves from is back. Could be barely back or could be back where everyone goes to jail.
Today I am just going to focus on three of the players. They all have been on the island. They all have done some horrible things to tween boys and girls. No one they were with on the island was anywhere close to being the legal age of consent.
So, most likely to flip and throw everyone under the bus is this A list mostly movie actor who is an Academy Award winner. He is the one who almost killed several of the boys to the point where his host no longer invited him. Our actor had a preference for tweens who didn't speak English. He didn't want to hear anything they had to say. Probably one of the cruelest people around. He lied to the feds like crazy the first time around and said he only went to the island to fish and lay out and relax. He also told the feds he never saw anything happen with anyone and that he usually was alone when there. He is by far facing the most time in jail if caught so would first flip our second a-hole.
A few years ago it looked like this A list director was going down. He never even was interviewed by the feds that I can find. Apparently he always went to the island via a boat just because he is smarter than most and didn't want any record. No record means the feds didn't even know he was a guest on the island. Our director would come for 24-48 hours of nonstop sex. Apparently he would take enough drugs to stay awake the entire time. The host flew in guys the director always wanted but was afraid to go near in Hollywood. In Hollywood, he would never go below 16 or 17. On the island, he would go way lower.
One person I think would actually kill himself rather than face any kind of public scrutiny is this permanent A list director. He too was interviewed by the feds but said it was all relaxation. Funny how the relaxation never included his wife. It was just him and a bunch of tween girls he made call him grandpa. Apparently there was not much sex but he assaulted the girls and touched them and made them touch him. He took a lot of photos. I don't know if the photos exist. My guess is the feds thing before probably would have scared him to death. He seems to have recovered though because he is definitely been back to his creepy self the past 18 months or so.
There will be way more than these three who go down if it happens. There are probably a dozen A list types who spent time on the island.
23 comments:
I'll say what I've said elsewhere.
The original Weinstein piece in the Gray Lady was probably intended to be the squirrel to keep everybody occupied while Uranium One played out, but it got out of hand.
Partly it was the chance to safely sink in the knife by some, but the #MeToo thing kicked off the lynch mob instincts inherent in every Lefty. What's going to be fascinating is that it will probably spread to DC and elsewhere. Even the Ozarks' death squads won't be able to move fast enough to get enough people.
YMMV, of course, but this is a once in a lifetime (if not longer) thing.
I think you are on to something ed.
It got away from them. The truth is going to come out. A worm like Spacey will rat out the others to save his sorry ass. He will give up other pervs who were at pedo island.
The rumor is that there are big names involved.
Including Billy Bob Clinton.
Of course Hillary will spin this to make herself a victim. So the truth may come out after all.
"Chickens coming home to roost!" but not as the devils of the left expected.
So where are the names. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.
Why squirrel with Harvey, when there are so many other easy squirrels. Hell, what better squirrel than the Las Vegas shooting, which strangely seems to have totally disappeared from the news. I'm not saying the Harvey story wasn't to be controlled yet got out of the hand.
I'm just not buying that Harvey was identified as expendable because of Uranium 1. After all, the Clinton sell out of US uranium has been known publically for over a year. Why waste Harvey on such a thing, when Clinton got off scotch free on the emails and Obama on the huge transfer of wealth to Iran. Sure, they lost an election, but that was sunk costs to anything that could come out now. If you think Hillary is going to perp walk because of Uranium 1, then you aren't paying attention to who is leading the prosecution (note, the same guy that already cleared Uranium 1 as nothing to see here).
On the contrary, I think Hillary may end up doing the perp walk because of the sex scandal. Lets face it, as bad as Billy is; she's always seem just fine associating with these people. Hillary's fine with the Podesta's. She was fine with Weiner well past the time when doing so was tenable. I think the throwing of things because of Monica was for being caught, not for dicking bimbos. She was fine with John Favreau taking pics grabbing her boob. And she was certainly fine with Harvey Weinstein. Either she is the most naïve politician in the world, or she was more than fine, but rather very happy with it all. I think she is fully one of them. And if there is any connection between Harvey going under the bus and soon to be Hillary; its because her loss made both of them useless to those that were willing to look away for as long as there was advantage to do so.
Nothing sells like sex, remember, and not only was Harvey in with the Ozark Mafia, which a few Lefties realize is helping drag the Democrat party further and further to oblivion (as is the Choom Gang) and so is expendable, but it also played into the Left's latent and venal anti-Semitism.
Go back and look at some of the editorial cartoons regarding him about a week ago. Harvey looks like something out of Der Sturmer.
This crap been going on forever. Go watch "Suddenly Last Summer"
Gore Vidal used to go to Thailand for the young boys. Lived in Rome in the 40s/50s for the same reason.
Nothing sells like sex,
Typically nonsense. Here's a line, if it bleeds it leads. You got nothing explaining why Harvey makes either for a good squirrel (more like a chipmuck really) or why it would be worth expending someone that was a big and reliable bundler, not to mention enabler and provider for Billy's sex. You just have stupid lines and wishful thinking that Sessions or Mueller might actually prosecute Hillary, when neither have shown one inkling of doing it.
On that happy note, here's somebody who agrees with me.
The eminent Mr Surber makes a point that not only do some powers in the Democrat party want Harvey gone, it's why the Podesta brothers have been nailed and Donna Brazile is sounding off.
Nobody wants the Hildabeast running in '20, so they want to dry up the funding.
As I say, it just got out of hand.
And I said nothing about the Beast being prosecuted, only that the Gray Lady would be glad to headline this mess, rather than let Uranium One become a household word like Watergate and further erode the Democrats' chances for a comeback while Donald Trump remakes the Republican party.
Again, YMMV
I think you are forgeting how much people hated Weinstein. He was an asshole and a bully to a lot of people. So when there was a chance to pile n everyone did.
That is my hope for Hillary. The cracks are starting. Bobo Brazil tossed her under the bus today. The first rock in an avalanche.
Anyone with a minimal knowledge of the French Revolution (myself as an example) will recall how the Terror eventually devoured its own.
We've had something like that for 50 years where the Lefty machine destroyed people in public life for cause or whim. And nobodt practiced the Politics of Personal Destruction like the Ozarks.
What goes around...
As if to prove the point, looks like the unions are next, to wit SEIU, the people who want a $15 minimum wage.
Ok Ed, square your squirrel story.
You wrote: "The original Weinstein piece in the Gray Lady was probably intended to be the squirrel to keep everybody occupied while Uranium One played out"
Don Surber wrote: "My theory is the New York Times outed Harvey Weinstein to cut off funding for Hillary's 2020 campaign."
I agree with Don too, but he makes no mention of Uranium One.
Probably because Don knows Uranium One is old news that doesn't make a blip in approval ratings among voters. Look, Hannity has been running around the last two weeks saying "I've been telling everyone about this Ukrainian and Uranium thing for the last year", which should tell you how ineffectual Hannity actually is, because no one cared for the last year. Mueller could investigate it, but why would he? Has he shown any interest at all in acting like blind justice?
On the other hand; Ed, you're right that nothing sells like sex. But as I said, I think Hillary is one in the same as Harvey. She had to know what Harvey was doing, just as he had to know what Bill has been doing, and Weiner, and Jon Favreau was doing (and the weird shit the Podesta's were buying). She'll be brought down for the sex stuff long before the Uranium story.
Maybe you'll understand this from a different angle. Which do you think your typical SWJ progressive cares about? The Sanders beating Hillary getting away supporting a crime wave of sexual assaulters; Or Hillary and Obama making bank by giving away US nuclear bomb making capability to Russia? The Terror will devour Hillary because of the sex, not the making bank.
The point is that Weinstein was expendable. Uranium One is still building, hasn't reached critical mass yet.
It is, however, getting there. And while the deal is old news, the machinations around it aren't. It took Watergate 2 years to reach critical mass, but things move a tad faster these days.
I stand by my contention.
And now we have an item that links one of Dr Evil's minions to some hanky pank.
Anyone else reminded of the fall of the Berlin Wall when people just didn't give a damn about consequences any more?
Sure Weinstein was expendable. So is Hillary. But he wasn't expended for Uranium One, that's just stupid, but go ahead, stand by your contention.
Heck even Trump is complaining that the DOJ isn't looking into Uranium One. The Dems didn't unleash the Weinstein story to hide what the DOJ was already hiding for them.
On the other hand, Iger stood to gain from cutting Hillary's 2020 Hollywood donations off. Iger didn't buy Miramax, he had it sold as Disney CEO.
What fake news says and what Trump says are 2 different things.
And Uranium One is all over the Interwebz. That's where the impression is going to be made.
But, again, you were the one who didn't want to believe Weinstein was expendable for any reason. The Left can't take any more hard shots. That was my point. Surber has a different take on why, but you didn't want to accept any take.
A few points:
1) The sleaze and corruption and abuse has been going on in Hollywood and the entertainment industry for a long time. It has been such an open "secret." Maybe it's finally going to come out.
2) Forgive me, but I can't help noticing that the media are all about ferreting out abuse among churches, especially the Catholic Church; and shame on us for giving them something to talk about. But somehow that zeal is entirely absent when it comes to public schools and the entertainment industry. Huh.
3) Let's not forget the lesson from the Catholic Church scandals that is only now starting to be talked about: that in the feeding frenzy, a fair number of dubious accusations were given credibility, and some innocent people were badly harmed. At some point, that's going to happen with Hollywood. So when I read these stories, I remind myself of this before forming a judgment.
you were the one who didn't want to believe Weinstein was expendable for any reason.
Talk about fake news. I never made such a claim.
Here's the direct quote:
I'm just not buying that Harvey was identified as expendable because of Uranium 1.
And you're only support is to claim Don Surber agrees with you and link to an article of his that neither mentions the word "uranium" or "expendable". It doesn't even mention "bus", as in thrown under.
Ed = Fake News.
I can't help noticing that the media are all about ferreting out abuse among churches
I'm not expecting Spotlight II. And you can bet any film made by Corey Feldman won't win any Academy Awards.
somehow that zeal is entirely absent when it comes to public schools and the entertainment industry.
They (progressives) will claim its all about the hypocrisy, which will be ironic of course. But they won't agree on the irony, because they're fine with both underage sex and sexual slavery (after all, they don't support the party of Lincoln). They just know if they admitted it out in the open; they would never win another political battle, at least not now. It's not the new normal... yet.
I think the next few months will reset their clock a couple of decades.
Another thing...
Its no secret that Hollywood routinely depicts corporations and employers in general, as rapacious pigs. Now we know why: because they assume everyone is like them!
The truth is, most people are not like them. Even it they wanted to, most employers would never get away with it.
Here's another, perhaps less controversial example of double standards. I just recently learned that there was widespread sexual abuse of female gymnasts, including some well known ones. The stories were reported but kind of sotto voce. They were easy to miss. The Sandusky scandal, by way of contrast, got huge coverage. I got the sense that the media really enjoyed probing and picking at every last detail of that scandal. I don't know why the media would downplay widespread child abuse among Olympic gymnasts and spotlight the crimes of an assistant football coach, but it happened.
And then there is this:
Vox’s unnamed employee and Lockhart Steel, along with NBC’s Mark Halperin, NPR’s Michael Oreskes, Rolling Stone’s Matt Taibbi, the New Republic’s Hamilton Fish and Leon Wieseltier, and Mother Jones’s David Corn, now add up to eight members of the elite media accused of everything from indifference to harassment to groping.
Pretty much explains the lack of coverage by the media doesn't it? They were in on it too.
Post a Comment