AJ: So what? No fuckin' ziti now?
Antarctica π¦πΆ is melting more than scientists thought, and it’s creating giant waterfalls pic.twitter.com/qgLGxOwCh5 — Vala Afshar (@ValaAfshar) July 12, 2017
No scientific consensus that this is AGW-related though there is journalism consensus for this.
It makes perfect sense to me that the article poles would melt first while ice would build in the Antarctic followed by an Antarctic thaw.Latent heats of fusion. Details at 11.
That's it. That's all the info that I need. I'm headed to the roof.
Antarctica: I'm melting!!! I'm melting!!!
As you go thru the slides, one says "How this affects sea levels is still unclear."but if you read the twitter headline, it says: "Antarctica's giant waterfalls are changing the sea level."
Post a Comment
5 comments:
No scientific consensus that this is AGW-related though there is journalism consensus for this.
It makes perfect sense to me that the article poles would melt first while ice would build in the Antarctic followed by an Antarctic thaw.
Latent heats of fusion. Details at 11.
That's it. That's all the info that I need. I'm headed to the roof.
Antarctica: I'm melting!!! I'm melting!!!
As you go thru the slides, one says "How this affects sea levels is still unclear."
but if you read the twitter headline, it says: "Antarctica's giant waterfalls are changing the sea level."
Post a Comment