"
CNN Debate Moderator Was Member of Clinton Global Initiative"
The Clinton Foundation later told Mediaite that none of these journalists were asked to pay the $20,000 membership fee required of members. However, it's safe to say that access to big name journalists was a key selling point for paying Clinton Global Initiative members. In a nutshell, Anderson Cooper helped Hillary Clinton raise money, and now he's presented as an impartial moderator for tonight's debate.
Then there is this story at the Washington Post.... "
While at State, Clinton chief of staff held job negotiating with Abu Dhabi"
During her first four months at the State Department, [Cheryl] Mills also held another high-profile job: She worked part time at New York University, negotiating with officials in Abu Dhabi to build a campus in that Persian Gulf city.
At the State Department, she was unpaid in those first months, officially designated as a temporary expert-consultant — a status that allowed her to continue to collect outside income while serving as chief of staff...
Mills reported her NYU income on public federal disclosure forms. She did not reference the Abu Dhabi element of her role on the forms, which ask only that employees identify the sources and amounts of their outside income....
Under ethics laws, employees are prohibited from participating in matters that would have a direct and predictable effect on themselves or an outside employer.
Mills said she didn’t “recall any issues” at the State Department that would have required her to consider recusing herself and said she would have consulted with the ethics office if one had come up....
In recent years, more than 100 State Department employees annually have typically been granted a designation that allows them to hold outside employment, including scientists, foreign affairs officers and Abedin, a senior adviser. But experts said that a dual employment arrangement is rare at the chief-of-staff level and that the nature of Mills’s nongovernmental work made her situation even more atypical.
“This is exceedingly unusual, perhaps exceptional in the history of modern federal bureaucratic leadership. I’ve never seen it before,” said Paul C. Light, an NYU professor who has studied government employment in depth...
After Clinton spoke at an NYU graduation ceremony in New York in May 2009, a top university official e-mailed Mills to thank her for her “help and guidance” in getting Clinton to the event, according to correspondence recently released by the State Department.
In 2011, Mills forwarded to Clinton an e-mail she had received from a university official describing a new NYU campus planned for Shanghai.
20 comments:
"appearance"?
One big unhappy royal family of grifting, lying, undeserving con-artists phoning it in for another "election" which they are presumed to win, although they may need to water down the electorate further still as some of the little people are becoming suspicious and uppity.
Trump will be on SNL in a couple of weeks. He won't get the royal treatment but he'll still score the best ratings they've had in a decade.
Just like Stephanopoulos.
The post basically says.. yea it looks bad what Mills did but she said she "tried" her best to comply with ethical requirements.
Meanwhile they dont mention in the story Bill collected big speaking fees from?... guess who... Abu Dhabi
The debate will basically consist of Bernie trying to deliver a few blows on Hillary while Hillary Blames the GOP, and everyone nods their heads in agreement. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzz
Sample question: "Mrs. Clinton, the GOP seems to be waging a witch hunt against you. Is that fair?"
"Mr. Sanders, Do have anything to add?"
"Witches are made of wood.
What also floats in water besides?
- Bread. - Apples.
- Very small rocks. - Cider! Great gravy.
- Cherries. Mud. - Churches.
- Lead. - A duck!
- Exactly.
- So, logically--
- If she weighs the same as a duck...
- she's made of wood.
- And therefore?
- A witch!"
None of them think there is anything wrong with it. See, you can trust them to be fair because they are superior to your ordinary people or those who might be Conservatives and therefore hopelessly evil and corrupt. They really think they are just superior people in their very souls. They couldn't justify it internally if they didn't believe that.
Incest is on both sides.
There is no bigger criminal in modern political history than Hillary.
I'm not watching. My guess is that haz is right. It's a Hillary-info-mercial.
"Incest is on both sides."
Show me the the right wing equivalent of all these debates moderated by Democrats sharing their underwear. We got tons of them on the Dem side. Every single election. Candy Crowley helping Obama with the answers by lying. Gwen Ifill writes an ass kissing book about Hillary right before she moderates the debate in 2008. Stephanopoulos all up in there rolling in Clinton juice, Chris Mathews having an orgasm over Barack, Anderson Cooper paying one of the people on the stage tonight, and on and on. It's not really both sides, but "incest" is a great metaphor for it, because one side is doing most of the nasty while the one is getting screwed and wondering why nobody stops it.
Just how many sexual references did you just make. Please. Lem runs a family site.
I can't bear simplistic argumentation. The candidates of BOTH sides are dirty and in bed with their fellow members.
Shorter deb: "lalalala, I can't hear you".
The thing is, Bags argument was not simplistic. You want simplistic arguements with sexual references, read this: "Incest is on both sides."
Bagoh is 100% correct. One side is incestuous. Period. If not , point out some specifics to the contrary. Just offering the tired "they all do it" cliche - is something Hillary would say.
Donald J. Trump Verified account :
" The Hillary love fest on CNN is ridiculous. I feel bad for the other candidates…especially the non-criminal ones."
"I can't bear simplistic argumentation."
Then stop doing it and give some examples (facts). I did.
~ said in my best mansplaining voice.
There was a Democratic "debate" last night? Who knew?
deborah said...
Incest is on both sides.
It's a function of gradients. Democrats by far exceed any levels of incestuousness than the GOP could ever choose to employ. Spare me. Either put up or shut up with your constant moral equivalence refrains.
The NYT cheerleading us into the Iraq War via Judith Miller's 'tip offs' from Curveball, orchestrated by Cheney, et. al.
See, the MSM knows best. They're our nannies because we're too stupid to actually know what's going on.
Consider the mindset of the average journalist...analytical (not by any means assured of reaching the correct conclusion), nonagressive, prone to negativity/fearfulness. Consider the 101st Keyboarders (neocon chickenhawk journalists who cheered on the war).
But now that the liberal journalists are 'in the know' it's different. It's like when JFK's infidelities were covered up to protect the nation's sensibilities, or when Roosevelt's handicap status was kept mum.
Journalism has been managing us since the beginning.
Post a Comment