Thursday, August 8, 2013

The Awful Chemical Language

I was often asked to explain chemical nomenclature in the context of such and such intellectual property law matter and one day I surprised a trial lawyer — an elderly gent — with my knowledge. He was actually annoyed at first, perhaps because he felt hostage to knowledge which he did not possess. Actually, he probably just resented that I could bill time for knowledge which I already possessed — just like he could. Had he known what it had cost me to acquire my art, he would also have known that it would break any law firm to buy it. Meanwhile, I had been hard at work learning legal terminology for several weeks, and although I had made good progress, it had been accomplished under great difficulty and annoyance. But he was greatly impressed and after I had explained a while, he said my explanation of the chemical language was very rare, possibly "unique" and he wanted to add me to his litigation team.

Friedrich Wöhler, the father of modern organic chemistry, already remarked in 1835:
Organic chemistry just now is enough to drive one mad. It gives me the impression of a primeval forest full of the most remarkable things, a monstrous and boundless thicket, with no way of escape, into which one may well dread to enter.
A person who has not studied chemistry — especially organic chemistry — can form no idea of what a perplexing language describes that thicket. Or perhaps they can, but can come up with no logical explanation for why things are so. I aim here to simplify.

The Germans invented modern organic chemistry and they logically fashioned the nomenclature in their own image — and just as the German language is troublesome for the beginner — having so many parts of speech — it's no wonder organic nomenclature is so troublesome. An average organic chemical name is a sublime and impressive curiosity; it may occupy several lines and comprise several unfamiliar names and numbers — things called moieties — and even Greek letters; it is built mainly of compound words synthesized by the writer around a core or parent name; it's quite often a word not to be found in any normal dictionary — several words compacted into one, but with joints and seams — that is, with hyphens; it may treat of up to umpteen different subunits, each enclosed in a parenthesis of its own, with here and there extra parentheses which reinclose three or four of the minor parentheses, making pens within pens: finally, all the parentheses and re-parentheses are massed together between a couple of king-parentheses, one of which is placed in the first line of the majestic structure and the other in the middle of the last line of it — after which comes the parent compound name, and you find out for the first time what the molecule is or at least what some chemical lexicographer thought it should be derived from. Sometimes, often as an afterthought — merely by way of differentiation — the writer shovels in the name of a salt, or in patent parlance "or salts thereof," signifying that the delicate molecular flower has been preserved as a salt, and the monument is finished. I suppose that this closing hurrah is often the doing of patent attorneys seeking to claim more broadly; it's not necessary, but covers the doctrine of equivalents.

To repeat, organic chemistry nomenclature was invented by 19th century Germans who wanted to create a simple system which closely mimicked the logic of their own language. Full stop. Therein lies the secret why that nomenclature is so seemingly obtuse — it is patterned after German syntax. In linguistics, syntax refers to the way in which morphemes are arranged. By analogy, "chemical morphemes" are irreducible units of metaphor; core words like "meth-," eth-," "prop-," and "but-" and ringed ones like "phen-" or "benz-" represent chemical entities. [1]  The studied reader may already recognize these morphemes in methane, ethane, propane, butane, phenyl, and benzene and the like. The endings "ane," "yl," and "ene" are, in a linguistic sense, inflections of the morphemes. Another word related to morphemes commonly used by chemists is moiety. Moiety refers to small clusters of recognizable function, for example, "acyl," carboxyl," "alkyl," etc.

By way of example, consider the common pain reliever ibuprofen which more properly goes by the name (R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid.

Chemical names are easier to read when you hold them next to the actual structure which is like a pictograph (hold that thought for later) or read them backwards in a mirror or stand on your head — so as to reverse the construction -- but because many refuse to learn the real language of chemistry — structural short hand — I'll muddle through the name of ibuprofen by way of example.  It's not a particularly elaborate molecule or name, but it strikes a nice balance between complexity and simplicity.

(R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid

First comes "R,S." The "R" stands for rectus (Latin for right) and the "S" stands for sinister (Latin for left). This gives the enlightened reader notice that chirality is at hand — more on this later.

(R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid

The second element in the name is the number 2, and because this number stands alone — outside of parentheses — the reader is asked to hold its meaning in abeyance until such a time as the parent morpheme is finally reached after much exhaustion of patience. Putting the "2" in front resembles the dreaded separable prefix verbs so common to German. Mark Twain wrote in his delightful essay, The Awful German Language:
The Germans have another kind of parenthesis, which they make by splitting a verb in two and putting half of it at the beginning of an exciting chapter and the other half at the end of it. Can any one conceive of anything more confusing than that? These things are called "separable verbs." The German grammar is blistered all over with separable verbs; and the wider the two portions of one of them are spread apart, the better the author of the crime is pleased with his performance. A favorite one is reiste ab — which means departed. 
(R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid

The third element, (4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl) is a microcosm of the whole name writ larger; in it we have a 2-methylpropyl corralled by parenthesis, which is itself corralled by "4-" and "phenyl." The name is starting to look like a matryoshka doll.

(R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid

At long last we arrive at the parent morpheme, which like the verb in a German sentence, tells us the key information: propanoic acid. In the lexicographer's mind, ibuprofen is a derivative of propanoic acid.

We have the germanic parenthesis disease in our language, too; also often expressed with em dashes and sometimes elipses and one may see cases of it every day in our books and blog posts: but with us it is — unless botched — the mark and sign of a practiced writer or a clear intellect, whereas with the Germans and chemical lexicographers it is doubtless the mark and sign of a practiced pen and of the presence of that sort of luminous intellectual fog which stands for clearness among these people. For surely it is not clearness — it necessarily can't be clearness.

Now dear reader, allow me to introduce a better way to depict all the foregoing and to illustrate the  foolishness:
Ibuprofen
(R,S)-2-(4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl)propanoic acid

I have color-coded the three main parts of the molecule, both in name and in the depiction. The reader immediately grasps that the red propanoic acid portion has a three carbon chain. The red number "2" in the name describes wherefrom the rest depends. The "R,S" refers to the two possible ways that the invisible hydrogen atom attached to carbon 2 may point: either out of or into the screen or page. The portion circled in light blue is a phenyl moiety having six carbons numbered as shown. The curious reader can attest that the portion in green indeed appends from carbon 4 of the blue phenyl. The left-most portion — circled in green — is the "2-methylpropyl" portion: it's really a 3-carbon propyl chain having a methyl affixed to carbon 2.

Lastly, it is perhaps now apparent (to me at least) where the trivial name ibuprofen comes from: I parse ibuprofen into three separable pieces: ibu/pro/fen

"ibu" is short for "isobutyl (another name for 2-methylpropyl;"
"pro" is short for "propanoic acid;"
"fen" stands for "phenyl."

Have you got a headache yet?
________________________
Suggested further reading:

[1] An Algorithm For Translating Chemical Names To Molecular Formulas
[2] Development Of Systematic Names For The Simple Alkanes


63 comments:

ndspinelli said...

Well chick, I glazed over the last 90% of the post, but found the first part quite interesting. Having been hired by hundreds of attorneys, probably over a thousand, I have run into this genre. Attorneys like to be in control. Of all professions, they are the most control freaks. Now, the really good ones will quickly realize you know your shit, and put that control freakishness on the back burner. It sounds like this was your first meeting w/ this guy. That's when the controlling is @ it's highest. It sounds like he realizes you know your shit AND CAN HELP HIM WIN. So, he'll let you ply your trade. The controlling may surface once in awhile, but within normal limits. The attorneys w/ whom I could not work were the ones who tried to tell me how to do my job. That is unacceptable. They can tell me what they need. I may have suggestions on something else they may need, but that's their purview. However, I will never let a client tell me how to go about it. I will succeed or fail doing it my way. I can accept failure if I do it my way. I cannot stand myself if I fail doing it someone else's way.

I have no idea the details of your biz, how long you've been doing it, if you're self employed, etc. However, as you get more biz, it's much easier to tell the control freaks to go shit in their hats.

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

Interesting to see the Eugene Garfield reference. He was a linguist who developed the Science Citation Index to organize linkages and create a network within the scientific literature. He made a good business out of this approach for many years and it is still a critically important way to look at the literature. The same basic approach was then used by Google for their page ranking algorithm.

When people complain about the uselessness of an arts education they often miss stories like this. The other example is Steve Jobs, who spent time in a calligraphy class, which resulted in the typography of the first Macs and the start of desktop publishing, as well as a better overall computer interface.

deborah said...

Now say it in German, chick.

Very interesting. I took (basic) organic chemistry way back when. Otherwise, I would be completely lost.

Sydney said...

The attorneys w/ whom I could not work were the ones who tried to tell me how to do my job. That is unacceptable.

Ha! A lot of them treat their doctors this way, too. Rarely ends up well for them. No one wants them for patients.

Sydney said...

a linguist who developed the Science Citation Index to organize linkages and create a network within the scientific literature....The same basic approach was then used by Google for their page ranking algorithm.

Interesting. I'm old enough to have used the Science Citation Index in college and medical school, before the Google. I didn't realize there was a connection.

Michael Haz said...

Chick - Your description is one of several reasons why my study of organic chemistry often required self-administering Delta-9-Tetrahydracannibol as a study aid.

rhhardin said...

I have heard but do not know that the way Google does translations is look for a human translation anywhere of the same phrase in similar context and use the translation from that, weaving it together.

I have a book from 1960 or so on progress in machine translation what, like artificial intelligence, was very optimistic.

Artificial intelligence is probably the field showing promise for the longest time of any field whatsoever.

That is, being a good candidate for funding, according to its practicioners.

Maybe climate science will show similar promise and last for centuries.

rhhardin said...

I never liked chemistry.

A college girlfriend majored in it, like all girls in science, for premed.

If girls liked it, how interesting could it be.

Darcy said...

The reader immediately grasps that the red propanoic acid portion has a three carbon chain.

No...she doesn't. Unfortunately.

But dang. I'll say it again: You are one hot nerd. And that doesn't seem a big enough compliment. This was way over my head but the way it was written made me want to try to get it, anyway.

Michael Haz said...

*As the non-hot, non-nerds quietly weep tears of rejection*

deborah said...

rh:
"If girls liked it, how interesting could it be."

I know this chick who finds it fascinating :)

Darcy said...

You've got some pretty hot brains too, Haz.

But seriously - the Althouse blog attracted some of the smartest people I've read. Smart and funny.
And now most of them are here and I still get to read them.

Win.

Methadras said...

Dammit Chick, I tried to forget organic chem and you sucked me back in. BLAST!!!

Methadras said...

I've been where Spinelli has been with lawyers. They want to box you in, find the weakness in your analysis because they think they know more than you do on any particular subject. The smartest guy in the room routine doesn't work with me. Usually. However, when I meet someone who has more thorough knowledge than I do, I gladly defer, take out my composition book and start taking notes. If you want to talk to me about root cause failure analysis, corrosion science, stress, thermal, fluid analysis, material science, processes of fabrication of materials or products, I'm your dude. Otherwise, don't tell me what you think I know, stand aside and let me tell you how that shit works and why. Thank you.

Then they get it and they see the value. You want what's in my head, pay me. Simple.

Synova said...

Ugh... that reminds me that I've got to drop Chem 2.

Synova said...

Also, I thought that the point of salts (thereof) was that they're not molecules but ratios... or something.

chickelit said...

I relish chemistry. I decided to dedicate my remaining days to teaching it--however long that may be. There's really no hope for an incurious mind though.

@Synova: Salts are ionic. A molecule such as ibuprofen may be converted to a salt form for a variety of reasons, including increased solubility in water for more accurate dosage, better handling as salt-like powders instead of greasy solids or liquids, etc.

chickelit said...

@AReasonableMan: I wonder if Garfield helped develop Chem Abstracts' algorithm for structure searching. Instead of inputing English words, you draw a structure and it converts it to a matrix where atoms are nodes having distinguishing coordinates and there are connectivity grids between nodes (atoms) corresponding to bonds. The eggheads in Columbus OH started doing this in the 1960s. Nowadays nobody does a serious search using just keywords or even a name. You search an actual structure data base using tools like SciFinder.

chickelit said...

Synova said...
Ugh... that reminds me that I've got to drop Chem 2.

I occasionally have a recurring bad dream in which I fail to drop a a course I hated and end up failing it. What does that mean?

chickelit said...

You're a sweetheart, Darcy. :)

ad hoc said...

El Pollo Raylan said -

I relish chemistry. I decided to dedicate my remaining days to teaching it..

That is so commendable. I hope you also impart the love of the subject in addition to the subject matter. I confess I thought that organic chem was so freaking hard.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

"There is something very strangely fun about this"

Says the guy doing the Organic Chemistry Naming Examples 4 video @ around 6:33 into the video.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

They had it broken into segments.

Here is a chunk with that "strangely fun" quote.

I didn't notice that until after I commented.

chickelit said...

Lem: I was going to correct the dude about getting the numbering wrong on the isobutyl side chain but then he corrects himself.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Its a lot to keep track of.

I took away that there were two naming systems, one more systematic than the other.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Sorry I didn't respond right away.

The Sox are on the verge of another late inning comeback. and I just jinxed it.

Synova said...

"I occasionally have a recurring bad dream in which I fail to drop a a course I hated and end up failing it. What does that mean?"

I don't know. And it's not that I hate chemistry, it's that I really hate chemistry class. Actually, I don't mind chemistry *class*, what I really hate is chem lab.

If you're teaching, please don't screw students over in chem lab. (Not that you would.) Instead of a lab that illuminates the information given in class so that you can do better in the class, the chem department here treats the lab like some sort of scientific gauntlet... three hours of hell for one credit. Because someone decided that students learn better if they have to "figure it out" or something, they make us "design" the experiment from watching a video without explanation, but of course you can't do the experiment the way you thought it should be done, you have to do it the way they plan to do it in class, so your "pre-lab" procedures are a mess, your experiment is a mess, and your post-lab is a mess... and in the end, the last thing it did was help you understand the lecture.

I have nightmares about *that*. And so I need to drop chem 2 because they won't let me take it without the lab (to take the lab later) and I just don't think I can deal with the lab-trauma this semester.

Bleh.

Shouting Thomas said...

I had to think about really hard shit like this all the time back when I was working as a programmer.

Writing classes and functions gives me something of a starting point for the chemistry stuff. Parenthetical groupings are important in programming, too. How you parse, even more so.

I'm not so fond of thinking about really hard shit any more. But, I sorta got it!

Synova said...

I also, now that I've let my whine out in public, have taken Geology labs. The Geology department is SANE.

ad hoc said...

I read somewhere that examination dreams - you have an exam but haven't studied or a class that you haven't attended but it's too late to drop - may persist into middle age. They are associated with stress if I remember correctly.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

"its like a secret code".

It's organic. orgasmic.




Freeman Hunt said...

What's a good book about chemistry for a young person who wants to know about it?

bagoh20 said...

A little broader than just chemistry, but this book fascinated me as a kid. I read the whole series about a hundred times.

http://www.amazon.com/Matter-science-library-Ralph-Eugene/dp/B0007E88HG/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1376023717&sr=8-2&keywords=life+science+library+matter

Palladian said...

El Pollo Raylan, I love you...

Palladian said...

My own basic, marginal foundation in organic chemistry became severely taxed when I became a perfumer. I would love to spend an afternoon with you, dearest Pollo Raylan, puzzling through my perfumery chemical inventory.

Unknown said...

I have variations of that dream all of the time. Sometimes I forgot to drop a course, and other times I realize I've completely forgotten to go to a course for nearly the whole semester....and then the worst of all, sometimes I spend the entire dream searching for a classroom, for what feels like an eternity (I sense during the dream that weeks are passing by and I'm unable to get to class.)

The only good part is the feeling of relief when I awaken.

And yes, I'm well into middle age. It probably occurs more frequently now than it did a decade or so ago...I think it probably relates to feelings of unfinished business.

Unknown said...

I guess I'm strange because I don't think the nomenclature is that bad. I actually kind of liked that part of organic chem. I like the logic behind it, even if the results are clunky. That is interesting to learn the connection to German language.

Nomenclature is funny because the underlying objects remain the same but we can change the names. I had a veterinary anatomy professor who was part of some elite group that periodicially met in Switzerland to make changes to the anatomic nomenclature, and when he lectured he'd describe the way they renamed branches of arteries as though he himself had created the damn dog.

Mitch H. said...

Instead of the fail-to-drop-course nightmare, the last year or so I've been having "failed to cancel lease" dreams. Like, I find out that I'm still on the hook for one or more former apartments full of my old trash, which have each been accumulating back-rent debt and unchecked vermin in equal proportion.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

I'm with Darcy on this one.

chickelit said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
chickelit said...

Freeman Hunt said...
What's a good book about chemistry for a young person who wants to know about it?

For pre-teens, I really don't know. Maybe rcommal could help with that.

I bought my son a a nice periodic chart for his wall and we used to have interesting discussions about it.

For older kids, there's Oliver Sacks' "Uncle Tungsten" which I enjoyed and suppose anyone much younger could as well.

There's also the unwritten story -- mostly urban legend -- of David Hahn, the radioactive boy scout.

You've identified a need, Freeman.

chickelit said...

C Stanley said...
I guess I'm strange because I don't think the nomenclature is that bad. I actually kind of liked that part of organic chem. I like the logic behind it, even if the results are clunky. That is interesting to learn the connection to German language.

I don't fight or dislike the the naming system either. There are rules of arrangement to practice memorize, but the syntactical elements are finite -- at least I don't recall learning any new moieties for a long time. When something new pops up these days it's interesting enough that you want to add it your vocabulary.

Also, I hope you appreciate that I was attempting satire much in the way Twain did in his essay "The Awful German Language" which you should read if you haven't.

chickelit said...

On the other hand, the language of molecular biology is the newer thicket that one dreads to enter.

chickelit said...

Palladian wrote: I would love to spend an afternoon with you, dearest Pollo Raylan, puzzling through my perfumery chemical inventory.

Naming and branding your concoctions could make all the difference between selling them or not...

ndspinelli said...

"Essence of Gay."

ndspinelli said...

"Fire Island Weekend."

ndspinelli said...

"Garland and Streisand."

ndspinelli said...

"Sully For Bears."

ndspinelli said...

P-Town Summer."

chickelit said...

To be marketed in Madison to Italians: "Spaciulli"

chickelit said...

"Spiciulli" would probably raise PC eyebrows.

Methadras said...

El Pollo Raylan said...

I relish chemistry. I decided to dedicate my remaining days to teaching it--however long that may be. There's really no hope for an incurious mind though.


Have there been any serious attempts to revamp the nomenclature system of Organic Chemistry and/or Chemistry in general to make it 'easier' or is it so monumentally ingrained in the fabric of science that even uttering to attempt it or trying is akin to blasphemy/heresy?

chickelit said...

@methadras: No more so than revamping German grammar or English spelling has caught on. Most practicing chemists use a combination of structure (pictograph) language and their own contrived names. The nomenclature is used as a way to organize and retrieve knowledge, not to actually use it per se. The IUPAC nomenclature is considered highly evolved and only in need of tweaking. But who knows, perhaps the Asians will develop something better along the lines of their own language.

Darcy said...

"Sprezzatura!"

chickelit said...

Darcy, I had to look that word up when you first tweeted it about 4 years ago, smartypants!

chickelit said...

@Freeman: Perhaps the answer you're looking for -- a book for kids -- is in the David Hahn story I linked earlier. Apparently he was inspired by "The Golden Book of Chemistry Experiments." But then again, much of what you read about David Hahn is urban legend.

yashu said...

What a wonderful post. You're a great essayist, Pollo: you always get at the poetic (and funny) core of chemistry, so beautifully expressed.

Love the language analogy. Which makes me wonder: I imagine there might be some connection between your fascination for/ dexterity with "the awful chemical language" and your punning prowess. Do you see any connection? In each case, you're playing with moieties/ morphemes, constructing new forms through substitution and re-arrangement... Is there anything in chemistry that corresponds to the multivalence of meaning and other qualities of the pun?

Something about the way your brain (your brain in general, and your brain specifically) works/ plays, analyzes/ synthesizes, what gives it pleasure: the "aha."

I'm taken by a sudden urge to re-learn everything I once knew about chemistry, now long lost.

Whoever you teach, is/ will be lucky indeed.

Darcy said...

And your comment was also beatifully expressed, yashu. You are very perceptive.

Darcy said...

Uh. BeaUtifully. I can haz spelling.

And it's Friday. I love Fridays. My heart starts singing on Thursday, which I call Little Friday, and just sings away until about 8PM on Sunday, when I get the Monday Dreads.

*singing*

chickelit said...

Obligatory link to the mellifluous singing voice of darcy: chirbit

yashu said...

Joining Darcy in song, off-key.

chickelit said...

Yashu: I view chemistry as another language -- but one that deals specifically with the unseen. Language is metaphor for real life things or events or at least things that we can imagine as real (so as to include fiction). Chemistry is sort of a hybrid language between human and mathematical language.

Chemical equations describe what goes on at an unseen level. We may see colors changes and parameters vary, but we don't see the atoms rearranging or electrons hopping from orbital to orbital. We may see convincing proof they they did. This is why analogy is so powerful in describing chemistry.

As for a love for scrambling words, it must just reflect my state of mind.

Thank you for your kind words.

Unknown said...

Also, I hope you appreciate that I was attempting satire much in the way Twain did in his essay "The Awful German Language" which you should read if you haven't.

Oops, sorry, I haven't read it so I didn't catch the reference.