Tuesday, November 1, 2016

"If Dems will rig a debate for Clinton, what won't they do to win?"

The latest revelation — that the town hall moderator overseeing a Democratic primary debate gave CNN contributor Donna Brazile a peak at expected questions, and Brazile then fed Hillary Clinton's campaign staff a question expected to come up in the primary debate against Bernie Sanders — confirms the too cozy relationships between the politicians and the so-called journalists and officials who are supposed to be helping Americans get unbiased information about candidates. 

Bernie Sanders supporters should be outraged: We've seen time and again how the DNC was never going to allow their guy a fair shot at the nomination. 

Via Drudge: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/303748-after-dnc-clinton-campaign-collusion-is-it-any

4 comments:

edutcher said...

PowerLine (of all people) is talking Demos' buyer's remorse

We don't know the internal numbers, but I do get the feeling those who do see the Trump Train heading for them and they're Wile E Coyote standing on the track with a sign that says, "STOP!!! In the name of humanity".

Thing is, we now have proof the whole Democrat party is a criminal enterprise and even the media is suddenly embarrassed.

PS I wonder how many Bernies will stay home or go trump.

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

I don't think they rigged the debate. I don't think that's even possible, in the sense that some mob figure might fix the world series.

I think there is evidence that they cheated or tried to cheat. Not at all the same.

Leland said...

I don't see an embarrassed media. They took Braziles resignation and then only after the second leak connecting her to a debate in which the only source must be within CNN. An embarrassed organization would be wanting to regain legitimacy. But they didn't fire the cheat nor shown interest in finding the leak.

Evi L. Bloggerlady said...

Hillary would eat infants alive, bite by bite, if it benefited her to do so.