Friday, July 22, 2016

"Mass AG Unilaterally Changes Gun Laws..."

"Redefines Assault Weapon Definition"

Town Hall:  With most of the media attention on the Republican National Convention (Melania Trump’s speech)—the Massachusetts Attorney General seems to have decided to unilaterally rewrite the state’s gun laws. The attorney general is targeting so-called copycat assault weapons (their words not mine) and would force manufacturers to stop making them and gun dealers to stop selling them. The law goes into effect on July 20. Those who have bought the firearms being targeted prior to that date will be allowed to keep them (Mass Live):
Gun manufacturers have manufactured these weapons as legal versions of prohibited guns," Healey said. "These weapons are illegal. They are copies or duplicates of banned weapons, and they cannot be bought or sold in Massachusetts."
"The gun industry doesn't get to decide what's compliant (with state law)," [Attorney General Maura] Healey said. "We do."
Gun owners, however, said they had no notice of Healey's interpretation of the law and were still unsure of what would be included.
[…]
Advocates for the gun industry warn that Healey's ban is likely to face a legal challenge.
"You have a person that's unilaterally changing the laws without actually going through the process, then telling licensed retailers they're not allowed to sell something basically with no notice," said Jim Wallace, executive director of Gun Owners' Action League of Massachusetts, a gun rights advocacy group. "This is going to be probably a very interesting legal challenge at some point."
[…]
Massachusetts already bans the sale of assault weapons and of copies or duplicates of assault weapons. But, according to Healey, some gun manufacturers made guns that are very similar to assault weapons but with small changes. For example, they do not have a collapsible stock or a flash suppressor. That does not change the lethality of the weapon, but it does let the gun manufacturers claim it is not a copy of an assault weapon, so it is "state compliant."
Healey's directive to gun manufacturers clarifies the definition of "copy." Under Healey's definition, if a gun's operating system is the same as that of a banned weapon or it has components that are interchangeable with those in a banned weapon, the gun will be illegal to sell in Massachusetts.
According to Healey's office, an estimated 10,000 "copycat" assault weapons were sold last year in Massachusetts.

8 comments:

edutcher said...

Get used to it.

Between now and November, and maybe January, you're going to see a lot of this.

The hard Lefties will try to change as much as possible while the climate is so Commie in the hope they can make it stick afterward,

They seem to be afraid of something.

Sixty Grit said...

Assault weapon? Like a brick or something? Knife? Or one of those scary black rifles with the shoulder thing that goes up?

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April's breeze unfurled,
Here once the embattled farmers stood
And fired the shot heard round the world.

Those days are long gone.

edutcher said...

In the People's Republic, anyway.

Titus said...

She is a lesbian and lives a block away from me.

ricpic said...

Liberals know they're right; therefore why go through "the process?"

Julie Pascal said...

Because the definition was always based on cosmetic elements... so manufacturers changed the cosmetic elements.

If they can't write a law that describes what they actually want to ban, they need to get someone who has a clue to do it for them.

Methadras said...

When I saw this, I called my buddy in Boston who is a big gun guy and said people are pissed. Even though Mass has turned into a giant leftist shithole there is a run on AR platforms right now even though all the gun shops have apparently removed them off the shelves. I hope california doesn't follow suit.

The RMPC's are disarming people in the thought they are going to be on their way out come november.

ndspinelli said...

Assault weapon like a truck?