Friday, September 18, 2015

George Stephanopoulos interviews Fiorina

But not as journalist. Why? How would you advise a young High School journalist to approach researching the subject at hand, Carley's misstating what is recorded digitally and available for all to see? Certainly you would tell the High School student to view the evidence themselves and report what they see but George does not do that, rather, like me he relies mostly on what other people say the videos contain, the worst parts, people with the kind of fortitude that I don't have needed to watch them all the way through and comprehend what is going on by snippets of conversation.

George doesn't need to watch either, analysts, his chums, did that for him and they report the scene Fiorina described does not actually occur on the recording.

AHA!

You see, Carly failed to say people described babies on tables still living and twitching Carly said the videos show them and they don't and that disproves the whole lot. QED.

Well let's watch the videos together then we can see for ourselves if they have the scene or not.

"Talk to the hand."

The criminal activity is radiant and needs watching, whether or not that precise scene as described is there.

"Talk to the wall."

And since you're not listening or watching or talking sincerely anymore we're forced to persist and take matters to congress, for whatever that's worth, to the oval office the aim as you see, and throughout all the courts with full energy powered by video repulsion and see what we can have changed.

"Talk to the galaxy between us. Those videos we spoke of don't even exist."



Aleister at Legal Insurrection mocks Stephanopoulos for taking his information from VOX, the Left's well-funded low-information explainers that manage to get everything wrong on purpose. And here, George the non-journalist, like myself, abjures from watching the videos wholeheartedly and this makes me as much an expert on these videos as he yet Stephanopoulos presumes to challenge Fiorina on this technicality that in their world dismisses the lot. I like Fiorina's way of slapping him down like a bad little dog and showing he is among those Hillary's supporters she describes who cannot be bothered to watch the videos of criminal activity they support.

He's seen as much as I have, he knows their destructive power and they're terrified. It's not so much that Fiorina is brilliant here as Stephanopoulos imbecilic. 

17 comments:

Chip Ahoy said...

Carly says Planned Parenthood certainly needs to be defended, not defunded.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
I'm channeling a Democrat voter
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
I feels like being a cheerleader.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
It's fun.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.
Carly said Planned Parenthood needs to be defended.

Amartel said...

George, you ignorant slut.

edutcher said...

Steffi improved the Ozark Mafia's IQ by 25 points when he left and they're still stumbling.

bagoh20 said...

I've watched. They don't SHOW precisely what she describes, but they do show a live intact born fetus, and they have a former technician describing what Fiorina said, and much worse. So no, they do not actually show a murder taking place on video, but it is pretty clear that born fetuses are killed outside the womb from what both PP people and the former technician both say in the videos. I doubt anyone is gonna have a video of the actual murder, unless they were undercover during the "abortion".

The truth is that nobody should be drawing conclusions about it unless they have watched it themselves. There is just too much emotion, money, politics, and morality at stake to trust someone else to get to you straight.

I wish Carly would have described precisely what is there. It's bad enough, and it could not be disputed. When you have something, don't overplay it or you end up with nothing.

KCFleming said...

I don't think they care whether it's true or not, because they don't find a problem with it.

Hell, Hillary, Biden, or Bernie or whatever numbnuts they pick could gnaw on some sweet sweet baby thighs on camera and then smack their lips AAAHH! and they wouldn't make a peep.

chickelit said...

Are the PP proponents perhaps arguing that a baby wasn't kicking but rather a live fetus was? Were that the case, it just becomes a semantics issue. PP proponents have always insisted that fetuses (not babies) are aborted.

chickelit said...

bagoh20 said...
I've watched. They don't SHOW precisely what she describes, but they do show a live intact born fetus, and they have a former technician describing what Fiorina said, and much worse.

The Left needs to keep insisting that the video doesn't exist and people need to keep linking the video until it's like a bus driving around town with a photo of an abortion plastered on the side. That will make the Left queasy.

chickelit said...

It's not so much that Fiorina is brilliant here as Stephanopoulos imbecilic.

Stephanopoulis is Hillary donor and confidant. He has no business covering the election as a professional journalist unless that is made clear.

In the old days of newspaper partisanship, print journalists were often partisan. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with that. But people (especially younger people) need reminders that Stephanopoulos is a Clinton partisan.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

why does anyone agree to an interview with that Clinton hack in the first place?

Methadras said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Michael Haz said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
rcocean said...

Stephanopoulos is Clinton's former Press secretary a life long Democrat part operative.

That's all i need to know. When ABC/NBC/CBS give a Sunday chat show to a former Republican press secretary give me a call.

Amartel said...

Bags, This is a non-issue that the MSM is blowing up into a Big Issue because it suits their purpose to divert from the original issue. Did she say, let's show the video and let the viewers decide for themselves? If not, she should have.

Amartel said...

Candidates have to go on these shows to reach viewers but they do NOT have to be beholden to the faux journalists presumptions and themes. These candidates really need to follow Trump's lead and start taking charge of the interviews. Turn the tables on these asshats. They have NO authority or credibility. The public recognizes that journalism is a gotcha game favoring lefties.

Chip Ahoy said...

Why does anyone do an interview with him?

For a chance to do what Carley did. She knew he'd pull that crap of "someone says ____, how do you respond?" bullshit. It's easy enough IF YOU ARE JOURNALIST then you MUST watch the damn things. It's easy enough. If only to prepare good defense. But they have none. And Planned Parenthood is scared to death of all this, they all know too well and say so right in the videos.

I should have said at the link is more thorough discussion of video content with description, explanation, screenshots and clipping by Margaret Hemingway, I think, I forget how to spell her name.

I must change the subject for my heart cracks open and spills other people's blood all over the place. These attitudes were sealed transfusions ago.

I walked half a block to a new fancy pants place called "the Art," strange name for a hotel. Not much shows at street level. Doormen greet you each time you go there both outside and inside.

The art is even in the elevator. By some interactive pieces by an artist known for that, but here it is intimate, just you and electronic art. For some reason I look behind as I exit on the fourth floor and see an electronic figure that looks like an x-ray with childish scribbles all over like rudimentary stick figure, and I notice the x-ray behind the scribbles has two sticks jutting out at angles. It's me. Son of a bitch! It's like surveillance 100% of the time. He got me. The artist really did get me.

The original model for the Museum artwork outdoors, the broom sweeping into a pan in primary colors. People take it for a miniature replica, but no, it is the original from which the main piece was copied.

This led to a discussion about Rodin's Thinker, same dealio, the original is quite small, hand size, the clay pushed around with his thumbs rather rudely. But I notice every once in awhile people copying that famous statue for ads and such often get the posture wrong. They have right elbow on right knee, it MUST be right elbow on left knee to force the torso to twist and create the visual dynamic of thinking.

Is that such an odd conversation to have with a doorman? No. The whole place is coated with art. It's everywhere. The woman I met July 4th was right. It really is impressive. Like an art museum itself. All post WWII is the idea.

They're overstaffed. People everywhere, thin men mostly, eager to help you along. The restaurant was between services and offered their patio menu anyway. The view is directly above Broadway, the traffic directly below a bit vertigo-inducing at first look.

Nice place to have right next door.

Methadras said...

Chip, to your point, Fiorina feels comfortable or confident enough to step into the lions den and deal with it and she has without issue so far. Frankly, I don't know why the RNC even allows any of the leftist news organizations to conduct these debates.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

I hate giving Stephanoppo-clinton legitimacy. He's a hack. All "media" hacks need to be pushed out of "journalism" and real journalists need to take their place.