Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist as a state.Do you think the NY Times would put it in their best seller list, should the book become available outside Iran and sell in large enough quantities?
He uses three words. One is “nabudi,” which means “annihilation.” The other is “imha,” which means “fading out,” and, finally, there is “zaval,” meaning “effacement.”
Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on “well-established Islamic principles.”
Monday, August 3, 2015
"Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel"
"Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has published a new book called “Palestine,” a 416-page screed against the Jewish state. A blurb on the back cover credits Khamenei as “The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Did they take their cues from Mexico when they published and disseminated information to their right honorable citizens on how to break in and invade the US and collect benefits?
How many clues do these guys have to drop before we wake up and tell Obama he's going to have to look elsewhere for his phony peace legacy? Will Chuckles Schumer do the right thing for the first and only time in his miserable life?
NYT bestseller list headed currently by delusional, incoherent, self-pitying, and transparently self-serving tome. So, shyeeaaah they'll totally put it on their list. And no questions will be asked about strategic bulk purchases as that would be unseemly.
Well, they didn't need much help with the outwit the US part.
"Book", so that is what they are calling treaties now that treaties can't pass Congressional oversight.
When Lurch is involved, the "outwit" part of the program is a foregone conclusion. When Obama is involved, you just portray yourself as "oppressed" and "brown," and he'll go along with pretty much anything you want because colonialism.
A while back there was a report by Robin Wright in The New Yorker about the situation in Iran. She stated that three of the primal Ayatollah's grandchildren have been forbidden to hold office in the Iranian government. Apparently there's a lot of subtarranean opposition to the current regime, and not just from the pro westerners. This is a wan hope,, but maybe things will work out. Dictatorships can last for decades and then collapse overnight...,,,,Iran was full of people who were offended by the Shah's royal palaces.. I'm sure that there must be many people there who are also offended by these underground nuclear facilities that cost a great deal more than the palaces and the gold dinnerware of the Shah. I think Iran is also spending billions to prop up Assad's regime in Syria. Maybe some people in Iran would prefer the money to be spent on other things, like potable water or more sex change operations for gays.
Of COURSE there are huge numbers of Iranians who do not approve of the Ayatollah and his regime but the U.S. government did not encourage their revolt in 2009, it was barely publicized and downplayed in our media, and now we are funding the regime instead of keeping the economic pressure on them that might have broken their backs. I amend my earlier statement about Obama: If you are fauxpressed (ie., your ancestors were ill-treated and/or you're a woman), somewhat brown, very bossy, and opposed to the U.S. and/or Israel, he'll go along with anything you want.
Post a Comment