When addressing claims this week by the administration that the deal shuts down Tehran’s nuclear infrastructure, Iranian officials scoffed and said that the Obama administration is misleading the public in order to sell the deal...Is not like Obama hasn't lied before, when trying to get something he wants.
“The remarks by the western officials are ambiguous comments which are merely uttered for domestic use and therefore we should say that there is no ambiguity in this (nuclear) agreement,” the Fars news agency quoted Baeidinejad saying in an interview with state-controlled radio.
Thursday, July 30, 2015
"Iran: Obama Admin Lying About Nuclear Deal for ‘Domestic Consumption’"
"Kerry and other top administration officials have been defending the deal on Capitol Hill in recent days, claiming that it will rein in the Islamic Republic’s contested nuclear program and fix its nuclear “breakout” period, the time required for it to obtain the amount of highly enriched uranium necessary for a nuclear weapon, at one year."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Of course Iran would say this, because it undermines the President and the US. Count on the President and Kerry to make this claim, and no one in the media to ask, "why would you negotiate a deal with people who would undermine you like this?" Unless the media asks that question in regards to the Republican controlled Congress.
That's not dysfunctional or anything./
hmm - who do we trust... Obama ? The mad Mullahs? choices. Hard choices.
Kerry said the exact same thing about the Ayatollah's comment publicly. He had to say that for the Iranians because politics.
So who should we believe?
IDEA!! Let the public have open access to the agreement including the secret parts that Iran and the IAEA have whipped up. That would be a first and most important clue.
Somehow I don't think the Ayatollah is lying. Not because he can't, but becasue why should he?
JAL, I noticed it slightly differently. The Iranians parroted the exact words of Kerry as a specific insult to his claim that they were lying to their own population. Indeed, the two top US foreign policy gurus of the United States really did say a rather stupid thing about the leader of another nation. But then, this is hardly the first time that our President and his SecState has insulted another nations world leader.
Netanyahu might not even be the most regularly insulted. We have the diss of the Libyan President by Susan Rice on CBS after Benghazi. The new Egyptian government is no fan of the Administration's previous support of the murderous Muslim Brotherhood. We know the President nearly took us to war with Syria because ISIS used chemical weapons on Syrians (allegedly). Saudi Arabia is pretty pissed off about this latest deal.
I'm trying to think of a nation in the Middle East that has any reason at all to trust Obama. Maybe Jordan hasn't been insulted enough.
The post following this one asks what we're 99.9% certain of...so here goes:
Iran will have a nuclear Bomb before we know it. Period. I suspect they already do.
Everyone (or too many anyway) forgets the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was a uranium bomb...a capability that Iran already has, as do most countries who have a scant scientific capability. I think a high school girl made the news a dozen years ago for designing a bomb in class exactly like "Little Boy"...the Hiroshima bomb. "Fat Boy" was the new & experimental concept, (tested famously in the "Trinity" test explosions) a Plutonium bomb with a more complex trigger mechanism & purportedly greater power...and it dropped on Nagasaki. Hiroshima didn't notice the difference. Hello?
Interesting times, we root for Poot and believe the mullahs over PUS.
Reality: Mr. President, the sky is blue.
Urkel: No, it's pink.
Reality: But Mr. President, there is scientific evidence and fact that show why the sky is blue due to it's large nitrogen content and the way light refracts through it, etc. etc.
Urkel: Listen, I know the sky is blue, but I have a legacy to create, uphold, maintain, and move forward with, so I sent Kerry out to make a deal with the sky to tell it that it is pink and even thought it didn't agree on many points, we agreed on other things, so we've agreed that in order to get congressional approval, we have to sugar coat this thing the best way we can, so it's pink. Besides, that's what the people want and now we don't have to worry about a nuclear armed sky.
Reality: Mr. President, but the atmosphere is a create protector against solar radiation.
Ukrel: That's right, so we can tell the people that as long as the sky is pink, it will continue to stop solar radiation. See, everyone wins. Now go out there, generate talking points, disseminate them to all of our MSM reporting allies so they can all be on point and on message at the same time and have the say it over and over again. That's one of the great things about these guys, they are always in our corner.
"It's not like Obama hasn't lied before, when trying to get something he wants."
Or all the time because he can.
As I implied above, I wonder if Obama really understands the difference between a fission bomb versus a fusion bomb. Iran already has the capability, and likely the means, to create fission bombs. As I said above, the folks at Hiroshima didn't notice a difference between the fission bomb they received versus the fusion bomb Nagasaki received. We've been living in a dangerous place for a long time now...
Post a Comment