Sunday, February 1, 2015

American Sniper in Baghdad

I've seen links to this article several places so I went to have a look.  It reminds me of the reporting done on Iraq in the early years when we got blogs from Iraqis and from American soldiers that showed us the Iraqi (and Afghan) people as Real in a way that our media seldom does.   The Iraqi's interviewed have individual opinions.  Some think the movie is great.  Some don't like it but have seen it multiple times anyway.  Some are philosophical about a man's responsibility to serve his country.

Mohammed says one of the film’s opening scenes, when Kyle spots a woman and child who appear to be preparing to attack US troops during the initial invasion of Iraq, had the entire audience on the edge of their seats.
“When the sniper was hesitating to shoot [the child holding the RPG] everyone was yelling ‘Just shoot him!’” he said.
(...)



 Mohammed, who lived through the events in Baghdad the film depicts, admits that scenes where women and children were killed were hard for him to watch. But all in all he liked the movie.  
“I love watching war movies because especially now they give me the strength to face ISIS,” he said, using one of the acronyms for the Islamic State. When asked if he thought the movie was racist or anti-Arab — a charge made by some critics in the West — he replied, “No, why? The sniper was killing terrorists, the only thing that bothered me was when he said he didn’t know anything about the Quran!”
Iraqi filmmaker Mohamed Al-Daradji:
Daradji hasn’t seen "American Sniper" yet, but he says he isn’t surprised that the movie is being criticized for inaccurately depicting Iraq. 
“There is no American films [about Iraq] — and I saw a lot of them — that have given justice to the Iraqi people and the events that happened in Iraq,” he said. “I sort of understand why not, because when an American filmmaker and an American company make a film they think about it from the American point of view, they don’t care about Iraq, they care about themselves.” 
“That’s why we Iraqi filmmakers have to make films about Iraqi people,” he added.
I think he's right about that.  The difference of perspective can be seen even between movies made about Iraq and Afghanistan in the US.  Critics here don't like American Sniper because it doesn't tell the story that they prefer to have told.  But that's the same reason that so few of anyone liked the "proper" movies about Iraq that held to the liberal anti-war (though who isn't actually anti-war?) point of view.  People want their own stories told, not someone elses.  And yet, even in Baghdad it seems that people find something of their own story in American Sniper, something that relates and inspires even.  Others find objections or racism or simply feel the movie is too violent.  Because people are people, and people are real.  They aren't an undifferentiated group that we can point to in our ignorance and say how we think they all *ought* to feel about anything.


10 comments:

Mitch H. said...

I went to see it yesterday. Surprisingly full house. I left feeling kind of sad and a little guilty, which is roughly appropriate for a good war picture. If that idiot comedian who compared it with that nazi war-propaganda film-within-a-film in that Tarantino picture did so after actually seeing it, he was an imbecile, and if he said it without having seen the movie, he's a turd.

I'm kind of on the fence about whether _American Sniper_ is a good movie in a technical sense. The imposed arc of the Syrian sniper was kind of artificial, and I feel that Eastwood lost control of the last big set-piece in Sadr City. It was kind of shapeless for the climax of a war picture.

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

AP: 'Sniper' shoots down Super Bowl weekend record with $31.9M

Not bad.

Unknown said...

Thanks, Synova.

ricpic said...

One of the most heartbreaking things about the whole Iraqi misadventure is that it's clear that a sizable number of Iraqis were passionate about democracy. I mean would I risk my life to vote? Well, thousands of Iraqis did. And yet the whole thing broke down because hardly any Iraqis could think of themselves as...Iraqis. They were Shiites or Sunnis or Kurds or Awahilis or other tribes first. Clearly they can't get together to fight off this monstrous ISIS. Oh well.

chickelit said...

Michael has a great review of the movie up here

BTW synova, there is an "American Sniper" tag available.

chickelit said...

Michael has a great review...

Michael Totten that is

Synova said...

ricpic, I think that is one of those things where we fail to appreciate the blessings of nationalism. People are too busy being sophisticated and dismissive of national identity and pride that they simply ignore that they're doing so while benefiting from it.

bagoh20 said...

In the beginning, Americans were separate states with similar distrust of federal government and with significant ethnic differences that even involved different languages. We did manage to hang on to our unity and democracy, but just barely.

I'm sad but proud of the sacrifice we made to give the Iraqis a shot at democracy. I'm also sad and ashamed that we let it slip away after the hard work was done and the easy thing would have been to stay. I expect we will come to regret that, and will be back there out of necessity with a much harder job again. I know the Iraqis will regret our political fickleness.

We still have troops in Germany and Japan, and Korea.

Synova said...

"We still have troops in Germany and Japan, and Korea."

I said years ago... we will have won in Iraq when it is an accompanied tour.

edutcher said...

The Lefties never mention how the people during Tet '68 ran for safety toward the Americans, not the VC.

Kinda blows the meme.