Thursday, January 30, 2020
Chief Justice Roberts Declines To Read Question From Sen. Rand Paul
My favorite senator Rand Paul submitted the following question:
My exact question was:
Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together
and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.
The Chief Justice decide on his own prerogative that he would disallow this question. Why? To protect the Democrats case of course.
It has long been rumored that the Democrats have something on Roberts. The assumption is it has something to do with the adoption of some of his children that was not quite kosher. It was the reason why he invented a "tax" to save Obamacare. I think they have something there.
After this impeachment is over I think we should have another one. Just sayn'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Roberts is the corruptocrats' ace in the hole.
There is only one mention of the chief justice in the constitution. Not how he's selected or what his duties are. The only mention is "the chief justice shall preside over the Senate during any impeachment trial of the President". They don't even lay out what he can do there. The Senate is designated to set up the rules. As far as Roberts goes, he ought to sit quietly, maybe take up knitting and knit himself a wig, like the English judges wear. Just another Bush gift to the nation.
Roberts represents the other side, the evil side.
In declining to read the question, which makes no reference to any "whistleblower," the CJ outed the whistleblower. Interfereing activist judge steps right in it. Judges should be seen and rarely heard.
I get stuck on "may have." In a regular court of Law and Order wouldn't that be calling for speculation?
welcome to Romney's self-loathing club for dorks.
Post a Comment