Tuesday, March 20, 2018

Hillary Clinton: We don't want any more inexperienced Trumps in the White House."

In reference to Ivanka Trump when asked by Eva Jinek on Dutch T.V. about a line in Michael Wolff's book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House. Reported at Newsweek.

I know, right? Newsweek, Michael Wolff, European T.V., what could go wrong? 

Why do I keep feeling that I'm watching people masturbating? Ew, gross me out. 

Nevertheless, this is what they talk about.

Eva countered, "... I've learned after these elections that sometimes things that we don't expect to happen, sometimes do happen." H. Clinton continued.
“Well, that’s true but you know, fool me once shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. And I think the American people have seen for themselves what happens when a reality-TV candidate wins. I really believe there’s an enormous amount of pent-up energy to take the country back from the Trump administration.” 
You didn't fool us at all. And the energy isn't pent up. And they haven't seen anything yet. And you don't speak for all people. And people are also appalled with idea of another inexperienced Clinton, such as yourself and your daughter, no matter how much you insist you actually are experienced. Trump has world experience that you can't even dream of, Coattail Rider, and he proves that to all who are watching. Your arrogance is truly impressive and unearned. Trump earned his arrogance.
“I believe we have a very good chance of winning the House of Representatives,” Clinton said referring to the Democratic Party. “[That] would begin the process of righting the ship of state.”
Trump is already righting the ship of state from your party's corruption.  We'll see how things shake out after I.G. Michael Horowitz's million-page report is delivered within the next month, and how many people will still interested in voting for any Democrat after the shock of your corruption starts sinking in, your ineptitude, and the protection you received is exposed.

More onanistic liberal nonsense at Newsweek.

3 comments:

edutcher said...

Yes, but inexperienced Ozarks is OK, right?

I'm Full of Soup said...

With all due respect to all the hard working govt employees out there, what does experience have to do with being a congress critter or senator or even president? If we had limited government per our constitution, we'd only be focused on collecting taxes, defending the country, enforcing laws and administering justice and property rights via a court system, building and maintaining roads, bridges, etc.

Schools could be 100% privately operated but funded by taxes and we could support the 5% of us who are truly hopeless with charitable non-profit groups.

Instead, we collect and misuse tax money by spending it on subsidized govt housing, medicare, social security, school lunches, day care, illegal and legal immigrants, college grants, Bus Development programs, idiotic "scientific" studies, Planned Parenthood [which then takes some of its govt money to lobby for far left candidates]. Is it any wonder we are broke?

I'm Full of Soup said...

What specific special experience qualifies someone to do the things I outlined above in my first paragraph [this question is for Hillary Clinton]? And why does she think she has that experience? Has she ever worked at collecting taxes, been in the military, been a cop or built anything?