Beverly Nelson accusing Moore gave a news conference admitting she added the D.A. and the date to Roy Moore's signature in her yearbook. As if his signing her yearbook proves that he knew her back then and that proves he made aggressive unwanted advances upon her young innocent vulnerable sexually budding self way back then before she became an angry vindictive lying cow.
But she actually forged his last name. And this is clear in larger color photographs.
Here's one. The original message is signed Roy. The new color ink begins with Moore, not with D.A. as she says.
If allowed, forensics will tell us the blue ink was added now and not way back then. But Gloria Celebritylawyer does not allow it.
While handwriting analysis is unreliable, and with ink color aside, let's do analysis anyway. For fun.
The upward notch on capital R in Roy differs from the downstroke loop serif for capital M in Moore. They would either be both upward notches or both little serifs, but not mixed impulses for first and last name.
Here, let me forge one for you.
The ending of one letter influences the beginning of the next letter, but the ending of lower case y in Roy does not influence the next upper case M. It can lead more easily to an upward notch than it would to a downstroke serif. Further, if the loop of the R and the large final looped stroke of the M were plant leaves, they'd be two separate species. But too bad. Signatures are disallowed in handwriting analysis because they're wildly different from all other samples. And poof there goes our fun.
3 comments:
This is going to shoot a big hole in Alfranken's reasoning.
Loved to see Trump calling out AllRed, too.
That M makes no sense to me. The first upward loop tiny and the second one huge? With absolutely zero handwriting expertise I can still say comfortably that such a configuration might be the product of a deeply mentally ill person, with emphasis on might.
Post a Comment