Hours before anti-Trump protesters attacked Donald Trump supporters outside the San Jose Convention Center on Thursday evening, potential third-party “#NeverTrump” candidate David A. French tweeted that Trump “incites violence.”
French did not respond immediately to events in San Jose, and has not yet responded as of this writing, roughly 12 hours later.
This is the guy warmonger neocon Bill Kristol and the NRO/Weekly Standard scumbags put up to run. He is supposedly a "nice guy." A "principled conservative." The guy they want to run to prevent Trump from winning after he won the Republican nomination fair and square. The douchebag who signs on to the idea that the white working class and their communities should just die off or pack up their broken down American pickups and move away.
This white wine sipping canape snacking cocktail party going cocksucker signs on to the entire liberal agenda while pretending to be a "conservative." Sure he wants limited government. Limited to doing the things his cabal of pusedo intellectual think are best. The low lifes who eat hot dogs and drive Fords should shut up and die already. He is part and parcel of the permanent Duopoly Republican division.
This piece of shit along with the scum buckets at places like Red State laugh at the people attacked by criminal Mexican mobs. They say it is no worse than a "glitter bomb" that they get hit with before they get ass fucked by Andrew Sullivan on Fire Island. They say that the woman who was pelted with eggs and bottles and rocks was asking for it. Of course they are working to get Hillary elected because she will make sure that they keep their rice bowl pretending that somehow they are advance a "conservative agenda."
These are direct physical attacks on Americans by Mexican criminals waving the Mexican Flag screaming that they want to make America into Mexico. The police are standing by and letting it happen on orders of the Democratic administration or spineless cuckservatives like Susana Martinez in New Mexico. This is going to get worse before it gets better. If the cops don't do something fast it is going to get real ugly real fast.
The Mexicans are drawing a line in the sand. The cuckservatives are cheering them on. The media and the Democrats are pointing fingers at the victims of mob violence and laughing at them. How do they think this is going to turn out?
Oh by the way it is now beyond doubt. David French is a worthless piece of shit.
37 comments:
Just like the One True Ted and Kasich.
Back in '68, I have a feeling the election was over when Richard J Daley's cops led Dan Blather off to the slammer.
Same here.
Christ, it was all over the Daily Mail - our other newspaper of record.
David French needs some head wear. He looks just like an Ayatollah Assahola.
This guy is just a piece of shit. A worthless piece of shit.
French needs to crawl back in his hole.
Prediction: in a week or so he will be a nothingburgher again. Bill's crystal ball ain't so kristol.
@Troop: The entire NRO staff is getting interesting to watch. They are all going to turn out for Hillary. It will be an amazing thing to see. April will be right there with them (for some unexplained reason). I actually loathe such predictability.
In the end, they are all heavily invested ricebowlers. Trump will "strike" them and "spare" no one.
French should respond right now about how his service in Iraq was about making California Mexico again.
I double dare him.
One of Glenn Beck's stooges feels the same as Mr French.
Where are the spokesman saying they should respect America?
They are the ones showing up inside Trump rallies and holding up signs. They were there, in San Diego. I saw them. They are not the assholes outside.
Is it OK to mock Ben Howe? 'Cause that photo is ripe.
NRO's strange new-found allegiance to Hillary should ultimately trace back to money: follow the money. This isn't about honor, or doing what WFB would do, this is about rice bowls.
Trooper York said...
Where are all the law abiding Mexicans I hear so much about when we talk about the immigration problem? Where are the spokesman saying they should respect America? The American Flag. The American First Amendment. Where are the law abiding Mexicans decrying the violence by their countrymen waving Mexican flags and saying they want to turn America back into Mexico?
They're out there. One of The Blonde's nephews lives in Phoenix and employs Jose and JosB regularly. Good, dependable workers. And I do agree those people need to say something. How many people know Trump has Hispanic support? The NeverTrumpers don't want you to know.
The animals in San Jose (and pronounce it the Texas way "San Joes", just to drive the Lefties nuts) are La Raza's Rent-A-Mob, like BlackLives are Al Sharpton's and Pissy's.
And, yes, they are savages, straight from the jungles of Central America, just as the Moslems imported from Somalia and Syria are from the deserts of Africa and Asia.
They are here for one purpose to - stuff Democrat ballot boxes. Occasionally they get to attack innocent citizens (going to be interesting when somebody with a CCW permit objects) to make them feel as if they're men.
It has always been about money. I have been saying that since the beginning of the primary season. There is a whole flock of consultants and pollsters and pundits who are terrified by Trump because he has no use for them.
Look at the consultant who raped Scott Walker. He spent millions upon millions of dollars on a conventional campaign and Walker was knocked out in a couple of months. He can on board with Trump after he won the nomination and started reaching out the RNC and the establishment to unite the party. He lasted two weeks and was canned.
The pundits and douches at NRO, the Weekly Standard and FOX are the freaking Washington Generals. Just there to put on show. They don't want to win. That is why Trump cleaned their clock.
Well, this is cute.
Looks like even Hillary thinks Trump is going to win.
There is a whole flock of consultants and pollsters and pundits who are terrified by Trump because he has no use for them.
It's not quite that because a good consultant or pollster or pundit will still find an audience no matter what Trump says or does. What's wrong is how spectacularly wrong they are/were about this election. My mantra is that they are so stuck in their DC bubble that they completely missed it this year. Do not forget that the DC housing market and salaries right now make 2005 SoCal look like a recession. I mean, George Will suggested several months ago that "the people" were in a mood for a Chris Christie and that they should go with him. That was before Christie dropped out and endorsed Trump. If Christie was as far out of the box as he could envision tells me something is wrong with George Will's vision.
@Troop: You will never get far trying to argue that every member of an ethnic tribe thinks alike. I know some good Germans, for example.
There is a whole flock of consultants and pollsters and pundits who are terrified by Trump because he has no use for them
They aren't as terrified of Trump as they are about admitting how foolishly wrong they were in their extremism. A pudit who gets things so wrong is very soon a pundit out of work or one who loses "followers."
Trooper York said...
Ed I hear a lot about these so called good solid Mexicans who love America but I don't know any. All the Mexicans I come in contact laugh up their sleeves at "white people." They don't know that a fat Irish guy hablas espanol and I know what they are saying.
How many are Mexican and how many are Cuban, PR, something else?
I understand what you're saying. You trip over the bad ones because they're the ones who stand out.
It's like the Baby Boomers. We're all supposed to be drugged out, over the hill hippies who are waiting for Bernadine Dohrn to bring back the 60s.
But the guys who fought well in 'Nam were Boomers, and so were the college kids who went to school for the education and became the backbone of the Reagan revolution, as were the hardhats.
edutcher wrote: They are here for one purpose to - stuff Democrat ballot boxes.
That interests me and probably worries the Clinton camp the most. They can't really cheat in the primary because they don't want to set off any alarms that could be looked into by November which is when they will really pull out all stops. There isn't much push right now to fill the polls with paid voters. They are holding off for November. This is why I think that Sanders has a chance to win CA.
Well, Bernie won the Hispanic vote in IL even though he lost the state. And Hillary will have to cheat to get the nomination.
Also, Trump has been pulling in record numbers in the Republican polls.
I think the surprises are only beginning.
When Bill Kristol et al. manage to drive WFB's hijacked legacy into the ground, I'll be sure to "remember to blame the victims."
Look, I know plenty of good Mexicans. They're here in the USA, working hard, because they can't make a good living in Mexico.
But they sure as hell aren't "natural conservatives". They work hard because they have to, but they're proud Mexicans and they like government handouts - just like everyone else. They have one foot in Mexico and one here.
And those are the good ones.
The Bad ones are the usual assortment of crooks, welfare cheats, and thugs.
Mexico is happy to get rid of them and send them here.
You three guys are sure having fun in this thread.
You may have read this in Popehat, but in case not:
I stand with David French.
I don't stand with him on social issues, at least not most of the time. I don't stand with him on many geopolitical issues — though I note that he's willing to back up his views by volunteering for military service rather than merely sending other people to risk their lives to advance them.
I stand with him as someone I respect, admire, and trust.
I met David in 1991 at Harvard Law School. He stood out. In a class awash in people from Princeton and Stanford and Yale, he came from a small private college in Nashville, but was manifestly intellectually qualified to be there. He was open about his faith in a positive and friendly way. He was unapologetic, firm, but polite about his political views, which were very substantially to the right of Harvard's rather unreflectively lefty ethos. These were the days of the Clarence Thomas hearings and the run-up to the 1992 elections, and political discourse mostly consisted of expressing disdain and disbelief at the existence of different viewpoints. David got hissed in class — that's what people did before there was Twitter — by the usual suspects.
Yet David, unlike some people with strong political beliefs, was generally well-liked because his strong beliefs were accompanied by an air of decency, humility, and friendliness. Friends — people with a wide array of political beliefs and social, ethnic, and religious backgrounds — used to joke that David was the reasonable man of legal lore. When we studied the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress — which traditionally imposes liability when someone's conduct is so terrible that it would cause a reasonable member of the community to exclaim "outrageous!" — we relied heavily on David. We'd explain the facts to him, and if he exclaimed "OUTRAGEOUS!" we felt comfortable in concluding that's how a decent, normal American would react.
Since then, David has led FIRE, one of my favorite organizations, to fight for the free speech, assembly, and worship rights of students. Faced with a war he believed in, and faced with the sacrifices of others, he joined and served honorably in a war zone rather than supporting conflict without personal sacrifice. Like me, he adopted a child into his family, and like me recognized that the opportunity to adopt a child is an incredible blessing upon the family that should inspire parents to feel profound thankfulness.
I disagree with David quite often. For instance, I think he's too uncritical of our international military agenda. I think his criticisms of the cultural left too often characterize the whole based on the bad behavior of the few and too often indulge in the sort of gratuitous rhetoric that doesn't live up to the rest of his persona. But I respect him because I know he got where he is based on principle and that, if I argued with him over it, he'd listen to me and discuss it with me like a grown-up (and perhaps give me more attention than my antics deserved). I trust him more than I trust the vast majority of politicians, even when I agree with those politicians' apparent stated positions of the moment.
This week's attacks on him annoy me. They annoy me because so many are careless, puerile and uninformed. They annoy me almost (almost) to the point of reflection — is that how I sound when I reject candidates out of hand?
I don't know if David will decide to tilt at this windmill. I do know that it would be a pleasure to vote for someone whose integrity and decency I trust, and for whom I have abiding respect, even if I don't share all of his views.
I like David French, and so should you. Troop would call him a hero.
I like David French, and so should you. Troop would call him a hero.
Give me a reason to like David French. He's too late to be duly elected in all 50 states. He is nothing more than a #nevertrump stooge -- an unelected spoiler. He must know this, though I am not sure of it.
And how can you regurgitate with a straight face that "he's willing to back up his views by volunteering for military service rather than merely sending other people to risk their lives to advance them" when he's a merely a puppet for the likes of Bill Kristol?
"an unelected spoiler" = "an unelectable spoiler."
@john: Sometimes you can judge good people by with whom they associate. Also, he needs to break his silence on San Jose.
Blogger chickelit said...
@john: Sometimes you can judge good people by with whom they associate.
I do, and that's why I posted.
David French completely relies on NRO for vouching. No vetting required (e.g., debates). Sorry, I'm just not buying what you're selling. Plus, did you know that Simon (the most vociferous #nevertrumper in my Twitter timeline) backs French 100, unseen? That tells me something. It tells me something's wrong.
Rice Bowls.
French is an asshole who poses as a conservative and is trying to elect Hillary.
Case closed.
but polite about his political views,
And that was then and this is now. Now he begins by mischaracterizing Trump as abusive of women and racist and habitually lies, and incites violence. This is his starting point.
So, lovely little introduction there, he sounds great when he was young and lovely but now he's an insulting asshole.
He's not even insulting me and I'm insulted just reading him.
And another thing, this is the thing that makes so many military men psychologically intolerable. This whole fucking thing is not about French's broken heart.
He writes as if it the entire thing revolves around him and his heart. His broken heart. That's what you call psychologically disfunctional. We can expect his family to be disfunctionally revolving around his present emotion. His heart. And he's expecting to convince people whose hearts are already broken by the party he is supporting. It is historically time to get rid of the GOP for not representing, not buttress it. GOP does not deserve conservative support for its own abandonment of conservative principles and their dereliction of duty to their constituents who are not even recognized, French does not recognize them, not recognized as valid, or else he wouldn't be pulling this shit broken heartedly or wholeheartedly.
Go your broken hearted way. I'm not listening anymore.
Well David French did not blame the victims of San Jose, because he did not tweet about it. That is all you got?
That San Jose blow up was the biggest gift to Donald Trump. Those scumbags and that scumbag mayor helped Trump. More of this going forward and he will win hands down from Hillary.
David French is going nowhere. He is already too late to get on the Texas ballot. Nobody knows who he is outside of limited circles. He has no serious funding. Why would you give him attention?
I don't know Evi why do the cuckservative press give him attention?
If what he does isn't going to matter why did they do it?
Other than as a club for the media and the Democrats to use to attack Trump?
You are not helping Trump with the cuckservative shit. You know what really helps Trump? Leftist douchebags like Sam Liccardo. Trump needs to stay on the issues that got him this far. There are blacks and Latinos Trump can win. They don't like how things are going either. Trump has to promote himself as better than #CrookedHillary, or if she is indicted, Sanders or Biden.
As for why Kristol is promoting French, it's because he doesn't like Trump. So what. He's a distraction.
aspirational wins
The cuckservative label hurts so much because it is true. That is why they are so vehement in response. Paticularly for French for reasons we don't need to go into here.
You are not going to win by pandering to Hispanics and Blacks. They have to realize that it is in their self interest to win. There are enough of them there already to increase the percentages that Romney got in a big way. But you never get anywhere by pandering to them. That is why it is a big mistake to make nice with them. Look at Megyn Bloody Kelly. He made nice with her. Went on her special. The next night she was hammering him about Trump university without ever having a segment on the Clinton Foundation. She puts on Jonah Goldberg and Erick Erickson to pump up French and the delusional Never Trumpers. You have to secure your flanks before you advance. It's that simple. The Democrats and the sleazy media use guys like French as a club to attack Trump. He needs to shatter that and turn it into dust before they try to stab him in the back with the broken shards. Because that is what they specialize in.
Cuckservative is stupid and does not win you anything. It diminishes Trump. Right now #NeverTrump is a small percentage of Republicans. Forget about that nonsense and start bringing conservative and Republican groups on board the Trump Train. He can keep fighting with media personalities like Kelly since that gives him free news cycles. That sort of thing helps. French is going no where, no money and too late to get on most ballots. Don't give him free publicity too. Diminish him by ignoring him.
It is not pandering to black and Latinos by talking to them and trying to win their vote. Hillary panders. Trump should sell his aspirational message (which is a big reason why he has done well). Every vote he takes from her really matters, that's how you win elections. He just has to do a little better with these groups than Romney did (he is already about tied with where Romney was) and he wins the election.
Not only does my assessment of French stand, but he proved it himself by opening his big fat mouth. French is an utter idiot for letting Kristol drag him into this mess then taking the reigns over the carriage that is carrying his idiocy at full capacity.
Post a Comment