Saturday, October 31, 2015

Marco Rubio schools Charlie Rose

That is how this clip is promoted most places, parts of it are everywhere. Most clips are half this length. The first portion is interesting I think by the two women doing what the CNBC debate moderators did. The exact same thing. They cannot help themselves. Their questions are typical attack questions. Statements as questions. Questions that include statements. The "people say... and the newspaper prints..." form. And they do say, and they do print. There is nothing inappropriate with the question, the point is they are always framed as if approaching a Republican with a ten foot pole and poking it, contrasting so sharply with any other guest, take randomly, say, Roman Polanski, and compare. Notice also Rubio ignores the first woman's question and answers something else, what he wants to talk about.

She repeated Bush's failed attack and repeated a local paper agrees. Is it a fair question? He answers he's not going to attack anyone.

Other female voice, like a squeaky cartoon mouse, "But did you make that a personal attack against Jeb Bush?"

See? That is all these people are capable of. It's childishly ridiculous. Obvious and plain to all. So commonly unhelpful the portion is snipped off for being too incidental. This part doesn't contribute to the point at hand, this first part only shows PBS limitation, it shows PBS is capable only of this, it cannot be anything else, PBS doesn't even know what you're talking about, it does not compute, "What is this bit about us fish being wet? Why do you discuss strange ideas like that with nonsensical foreign words?" So they just clip it out in favor of the good part, the juicy part, Rose not comprehending Hillary's pant suit is on fire and spawning brushfires as she passes. It doesn't matter what Rubio says, Rose is impenetrable. His mind will refuse what that horrible Rubio face is saying, a million mental fibers spring forth and overwhelm the invading virus to engulf and expel it.

So the two women's questions combined are a mess, in the exact same way the debate is a mess. In miniature. So common it's usually snipped out of the video when presented. Then Charlie Rose messily wedges his way into the mess, the mansplainy way wavering, "We-e-e-e-ll you did call Hillary Clinton a liar."

Rubio restates what all conservatives say repeatedly as if chipping at granite with copper tools. They are asking about the previous night debate. Rose's greeting to Rubio included the debate. Rose's first question is debate-related the ladies' two debate-like questions are debate-related. Rubio's answer is debate-related. Rose, being liberal in possession of a fluid liberal mind reaches here and there pouring, pooling, it flows to the low spots and collects there he cannot stay on the debate. His mind flowed to Clinton. Rubio said he intends not to attack rather to tell voters what he is about, and Rose's mind pours beyond the debate, he cannot focus. Rubio said he won't be critical of other candidates. He attacked my candidate. Attack Rubio. "We-e-e-e-ll. (repeats) Well, you did call Hillary Clinton a liar... Senator. You called Hillary Clinton a liar." Rose repeats.

Rose is gravely offended by that and it shows on his face and that is good.

Imagine greeting a guest angrily, Welcome to PBS.

Skip to 1:25 for Rubio delivering the goods. He holds forth solidly undistracted throughout while Rose persistently interrupts, as liberals do when they're hearing something they don't like hearing, they shut it out, resist, vocalize their resistance sentence by sentence, they see where the sentence is going and STOP it as psychological defense and Rose cannot help himself as liberal debate moderators cannot help themselves either, as no liberal can help them self. They don't interview, they interrogate, they poke and jab, but with eye protection and ear protection and helmet and hazmat suit because none of the three PBS panel can accept the words coming out of Rubio's mouth. Their ears cannot hear it. Their brains will not process it as real data. This face on the screen is not even a person. It's foreign material, too dangerous to accept honestly, thus Roses' pure resistance.

"You know CIA was changing their assessment during that time ... zone.

If you're calling her a liar, that she perpetuated a lie, then why would she do that? What was her motive?

So you are saying that Hillary Clinton LIED because she wanted to help Barack Obama with his reelection campaign

Do you deny the CIA was sending different information as they assessed it, that they provided different information to the leaders of our government?

Without violating

David Petraeus..."

Sputters to an end with conservative point of view delivered excellently unheard and unprocessed by the PBS panel. 100% rejected.

This interview fits precisely the template of that CNBC debate. Considered a template, this video is Banksy sprayed across every conversation of my present day life. Everybody I know is liberal and this is how they think and speak.

For your pleasure: Charlie Rose Pushes Back Against Rubio's False Claim that "Hillary Clinton Lied About Benghazi." To whomever, thank you for uploading this to YouTube, bless your heart, you're helpful.



26 comments:

Leland said...

So I use Bing as a search engine and my home page. They tend to put trending stories on a bar at the bottom. One such story, "‘Probably the largest’ al-Qaeda training camp ever destroyed in Afghanistan". But the Obama Administration told us Al Qaeda was on the run in 2012. Anyway, I called this at the time at TOP, the video narrative was to avoid using the phrase al-Qaeda.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

Charlie Rose was openly hostile - like he is there to protect and promote Hillary.

Which he is. Because Charlie Rose is a HACK. Is is yet another cog in the corrupt democrat media industrial complex.


Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

Charlie Rose looked like he was going to jump over the table and strangle Rubio.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

You know what would have been even better?

Rubio should have asked Charlie Rose(D) this question: "So Charlie, do YOU believe the attack in Benghazi was based on reaction from a youtube video?"

***
btw- isn't there clear evidence now that shows the administration spent time looking for a youtube video to blame?

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

More questions for Charlie: "So Charlie -- Would you have stood next to the coffins of 4 dead Americans, including our ambassador, and told the families of the victims that you were going to "get the guy who made the video" even though you knew it was a lie?"

So Charlie, you know the CIA never once said that the attack was because of a youtube video - right? "

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

When Rubio said he wasn't going to attack another candidate he was referring to republican primary candidates, not candidates of the other party.

Hillary is open game and she should be.

Tank said...

The good thing is that some of the candidates are finally figuring out how to deal with the media wing of the DNC.

If only Romney had kicked Candy Fatass off the stage at debate 2, he would have been president today.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

I noted that too, Lem. The subject was other GOP candidates - not Hillary.
The left actually think that their candidates are off limits. How dare you!

Charlie was waiting to pounce. No matter - Rubio handled it with a concept completely alien to leftwing media hackiness - THE TRUTH.

ndspinelli said...

The emails between Obama and Hillary are the smoking guns.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

Hey Charlie, It's obvious you are carrying Hillary's water. Why do you want to cover for her? do you give money to the Clinton Foundation? Why would you want to cover for her?

William said...

Rubio has a low center of gravity. He never gets flustered and always answers in a persuasive, personable way.......I think a lot of people watch Charlie Rose because they like Charlie Rose. They probably key their responses to a guest based on Charlie Rose's responses to that guest. I think Rubio won the argument, but my fear is that the fans of Charlie Rose will take more note of Rose's distaste for Rubio's points and that that will be their takeaway.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
William said...

When you look at Robert Redford, you don't see some rambling old man with crazy hair like Bernie Sanders. No, you see the Sundance Kid. I wish more liberals looked like Bernie Sanders.

Joe Biden, America's Putin said...

A while back charlie interviewed Hillary. He was calm and nice, and he didn't interrupt her at all. It was a soft-ball interview that could be used as a campaign ad for her. All the questions were easy tee-offs for Hillary to present her pre-disgested focus group talking points. Easy - calm - nice. The opposite of any interview with the any member of the GOP. Especially one who doesn't stay on the D-party lie train.

chickelit said...

Charlie Rose Law Firm

deborah said...

Well, that's a weird little clip. Rose kept intoning Hillary Lied and Rubio made his talking point about four times with great clarity.

Trooper York said...

I met Charlie Rose at a Knicks game about ten years ago.

He is just as much of a pompous Commie douche bag back then.

I might have mentioned that to him at the time.

Of course I was drinking then.

Trooper York said...

I might have peed on his shoes.

ampersand said...

I hope Robert Redford was watching. This has the makings of "Son of Truth" He can play both
Rose and Rodham fighting fearlessly to prove Benghazi was indeed all about a video, and that is was Bush's fault as well.

Evi L. Bloggerlady said...

Well said Chip. It was the debate in miniature but Rubio deftly dealt with Rose

bagoh20 said...

Finally watched it. That's pretty good from Rubio. He didn't back down from the "Hillary is a liar" statement. He restated over and over why it's a fact. Rose expected him to just back down like politicians usually do about calling a liar exactly what they are.

Rubio is the Republican Obama in terms of experience, but that is a huge difference. The media won't let him get away with lying or ignoring the Constitution. That makes him 1000% better right there. And Hillary's experience is actually a negative. To spend your whole life in politics and accomplish nothing but compiling enormous wealth by whining about income inequality is pretty good proof that you are just a self-interested hack uninterested in serving the rest of us or getting things done for the country.

deborah said...

Rose was pushing the word Liar, as opposed to Rubio saying she lied. Rose did it three times, IIRC. My dad told me when I was about six that liar was one of the worst things you can call someone. Always stuck with me.

ndspinelli said...

It is. And one should always be prudent before using that "liar" hammer. I catch people lying for a living. I don't call someone a liar w/o solid proof. Hillary is a lying sack o' shit.

JAL said...

I posted 'Hillary lied to the families of the dead guys" on a lefty acquaintance's adoring cotton candy slurp about Hillary after the House Committee appearance. I just can't stand this anymore.

There is something seriously wrong with people who can't hear words spoken and process them into their correct meanings. Unfortunately they vote. This acquaintance has a master's degree in a mental health field and she can't figure out when someone is lying in a pretty simple way? Did Hillary tell the families it was due to a video, did Susan Rice blab it all over the Sunday news shows? (FIVE of them in one morning?) Did Hillary tell at least three other people by name right way that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and in one case specified it was not the "film?"

Four dead Americans, even a dead Democrat Ambassador, isn't worth sh*t to Hillary Clinton or her people -- Charlie Rose.

It's when she high-fived Alcee Hastings on her way out - in front of the families -- that I realized she is a ghoul in a pantsuit.

chickelit said...

@JAL: Those people know that Hillary lied; they just believe that she lied for a greater cause. I'll bet that even R&B would defend Rodham lying because so much was at stake.