Friday, January 24, 2014

Have you ever ducked and covered?

Here are some low-lights of a New Yorker article showing how the management of the U.S.'s nuclear program mirrored and mirrors the movie, Dr. Strangelove. 
"Aware that his decision [to allow military officers freedom to launch nuclear missiles] might create public unease about who really controlled America’s nuclear arsenal, Eisenhower insisted that his delegation of Presidential authority be kept secret. At a meeting with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, he confessed to being “very fearful of having written papers on this matter.”
President John F. Kennedy was surprised to learn, just a few weeks after taking office, about this secret delegation of power. “A subordinate commander faced with a substantial military action,” Kennedy was told in a top-secret memo, “could start the thermonuclear holocaust on his own initiative if he could not reach you.” Kennedy and his national-security advisers were shocked not only by the wide latitude given to American officers but also by the loose custody of the roughly three thousand American nuclear weapons stored in Europe. Few of the weapons had locks on them. Anyone who got hold of them could detonate them. And there was little to prevent NATO officers from Turkey, Holland, Italy, Great Britain, and Germany from using them without the approval of the United States.
...Harold Agnew, a Los Alamos physicist who accompanied the [Congressional NATO tour] group, was especially concerned to see German pilots sitting in German planes that were decorated with Iron Crosses—and carrying American atomic bombs. Agnew, in his own words, “nearly wet his pants” when he realized that a lone American sentry with a rifle was all that prevented someone from taking off in one of those planes and bombing the Soviet Union.



...Coded switches to prevent the unauthorized use of nuclear weapons were finally added to the control systems of American missiles and bombers in the early nineteen-seventies. The Air Force was not pleased, and considered the new security measures to be an insult, a lack of confidence in its personnel. Although the Air Force now denies this claim, according to more than one source I contacted, the code necessary to launch a missile was set to be the same at every Minuteman site: 00000000.
... [Currently] the Department of Defense’s Personnel Reliability Program is supposed to keep people with serious emotional or psychological issues away from nuclear weapons—and yet two of the nation’s top nuclear commanders were recently removed from their posts. Neither appears to be the sort of calm, stable person you want with a finger on the button. In fact, their misbehavior seems straight out of “Strangelove.”
Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, the second-highest-ranking officer at the U.S. Strategic Command—the organization responsible for all of America’s nuclear forces—-was investigated last summer for allegedly using counterfeit gambling chips at the Horseshoe Casino in Council Bluffs, Iowa. According to the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation, “a significant monetary amount” of counterfeit chips was involved. Giardina was relieved of his command on October 3, 2013. A few days later, Major General Michael Carey, the Air Force commander in charge of America’s intercontinental ballistic missiles, was fired for conduct “unbecoming an officer and a gentleman.”According to a report by the Inspector General of the Air Force, Carey had consumed too much alcohol during an official trip to Russia, behaved rudely toward Russian officers, spent time with “suspect” young foreign women in Moscow, loudly discussed sensitive information in a public hotel lounge there, and drunkenly pleaded to get onstage and sing with a Beatles cover band at La Cantina, a Mexican restaurant near Red Square. Despite his requests, the band wouldn’t let Carey onstage to sing or to play the guitar.
 ...In August, 2013, the entire missile wing at Malmstrom Air Force base in Montana failed its safety inspection. Last week, the Air Force revealed that thirty-four launch officers at Malmstrom had been decertified for cheating on proficiency exams—and that at least three launch officers are being investigated for illegal drug use. The findings of a report by the RAND Corporation, leaked to the A.P., were equally disturbing."
The New Yorker

I was six years-old and in the first grade in 1964. One morning the teacher taught us to duck and cover. I remember thinking, how is my hand on my neck supposed to shield me from the building crashing down. Coincidentally, that day, as we stood in line to go to lunch, the air siren went off, and we all hit the deck, our lunch boxes slamming the floor simultaneously. 

27 comments:

Shouting Thomas said...

That is a truly funny post!

Life imitates art!

The only thing standing between us and self-destruction is a bunch of Homer Simpsons! Isn't Homer the nuclear safety inspector at the Springfield nuclear power plant?

Drunken karaoke, too! Homer is in to that, too!

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

Of greater concern is how incompetence allowed a mineshaft gap.

Unknown said...

So world will end with a whimper... or a big oops.

Palladian said...

I don't buy that bullshit.

Yeah, I mean, when has the federal government ever fucked anything up?

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

This is why nuclear arms reduction is always a good thing. Imagine the soviet era stories that could be told as a mirror to these stories.

ricpic said...

Obama just sent out a directive that only Muslim Brotherhood members in the DOD have secret code number access. Whew, safe at last.

bagoh20 said...

Sure, some of it might be true to some degree, but really, all of it? That seems plausible to people? Not to me. People have responsibilities, and they know their ass will be done if something goes wrong and they acted this foolishly. We all have competitors around us who would spill the beans on our incompetence to promote themselves, and believe it or not there are good people who care about things in every operation, and they know people would ask them "why didn't you do something?"

If it is true, then we just got lucky for all those years? Our enemies never even tried to get past this non security, and none of these many people who could launch a terrible incident ever got a little stressed out and lost it over all that time - thousands of opportunities?

This is comical level incompetence that even the three stooges couldn't make believable. It's silly and sounds like fabrication to me.

bagoh20 said...

" Imagine the soviet era stories that could be told as a mirror to these stories."

So yea, take what I said above and double it, plus China, India, etc. Yet no incidents. You can't hide an accidental nuclear launch. It's not believable.
Some sure, but most of it is just exaggeration.

Icepick said...

No, Eric, the greater concern is that the morons that got removed are all far more competent and capable than their civilian masters.

AllenS said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
AllenS said...

If someone set off a nucular bomb in Canada, maybe, just maybe, we could snap this cold streak.

bagoh20 said...

You can't believe that things were that lax for all those years with no incidents or theft of the most valuable items on the planet and then still be an atheist.

Icepick said...

If someone set off a nucular bomb in Canada, maybe, just maybe, we could snap this cold streak.

Forget that, go straight to the source. Nuke the north pole until that fucking thing gets blasted into space.

Lydia said...

I'm going with bagoh's take -- that "this comical level incompetence that even the three stooges couldn't make believable" and that "people have responsibilities, and they know their ass will be done if something goes wrong and they acted this foolishly.

This commenter, TahoeCharles, over at that New Yorker article shows it was all taken very seriously:

"I was on a Minuteman missile crew from early 1967 to late 1968. Yes, the duty was horrible and boring. To make it better, the USAF set up a masters program for the launch crew officers so they would end their 4 tour of duty with an advanced degree.

To make things a little better was our wing commanders policy of taking care of his officers. Those taking the education program had 7 24 hour alert tours a month. Those not going to school would get 8. This resulted in basically working a 24 hour shift plus travel time to the missile launch center and having just under 48 hours off.

To make the 4 year tour of duty a really good deal, all the alert tours were scheduled during a 3 week period every month. Included in this three weeks was all the required monthly training. This gave every missile crew member 7 consecutive days off every month. Only an national emergency or wing inspection would change the schedule. We worked long hours but were given time off to spend with our families and do some traveling. The schedule rarely changed once it was published. Most of us were really happy."

Okay, could be a fake commenter. But if it's legit, and to me it sounds like it is, that shows the military was deeply concerned that bad stuff not happen. And also sounds like a guy who was conscientious about doing a good job.

Michael Haz said...

Not sure I believe the parts about the recent removal of the top commanding officers, but I'd like to hear Aridog's take on it.

It feels like a story planted in the NYT. The BHO administration has thus far removed nearly 200 top ranking Generals and Admirals from duty, and at the same time ordered them to remain silent about their removal from service.

The story circulating is that they were removed because they didn't answer the questions "do you support and defend the constitution or the President?" correctly, and also the question "if ordered to do so by the President, would you fire on unarmed American citizens?"

There needs to be stories floated as to why military officials have been relieved of command, no?

Eric the Fruit Bat said...

I think, perhaps, the answer to the question recently put by revenant might be: instigators abound.

virgil xenophon said...

As someone who sat nuclear alert in an F-4D on top of a tactical nuke in USAFE at a base in the UK for three years 69-71, I call bullshit. The problem has been that, with the dissolution of a dedicated nuclear force like SAC and the folding of its mission in with the rest of the force, and the stand-down of the tactical nuclear force in Europe, the nuclear deterrent mission has lost its focus.

During my day the worry was that we wouldn't be able to get a valid launch off in time because we were still playing pretend with a hybrid force with one foot in peace-time and one foot in wartime alert status. Two examples: As we were a twin-base complex our birds on alert at RAF Woodbridge would get the "go code" IN THE CLEAR--NOT encrypted--over the radio from the command post at RAF Bentwaters. All it would have taken was a Soviet agent with a WW II-type coffee-grinder jammer sitting on the public road that passed within less than 100' from the runway perimeter to jam any
launch signal! Further, at our forward rotation base at Incirlik, AFB, Adana, Turkey, all that prevented an unauthorized launch of nuclear wpns in the alert pits was an enlisted Air-Police 3-striper type with a rifle stationed by each aircraft who would verify the launch code the pilots sitting in the aircraft received over their radios from the US command post via a separate land-line phone to his station that ran thru the Turkish Base Command Post. (If anyone thinks that the Turkish command post wasn't compromised by Soviet spies I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd REALLY like to talk to you about.) If the launch code had been authorized for real in 1971 those aircrews would STILL, TODAY be waiting for that USAF enlisted Air Police type to get the authorized confirmation--all land-lines in the Turkish CP having long been cut by Communist spies in the Turkish Command post.

No the real danger in the real world is/was that we WON"T be able to launch in time--NOT the opposite..

virgil xenophon said...

PS: I should add that the use of the launch code of 0000000 in the 60s/early 70s was NOT insane. In those days almost everything was stove-piped with all systems being analog electro-mechanical systems TOTALLY isolated from anything like a digital internet that could be hacked. Use of 000000 provided a visual guard against a hypertensive individual under the intense pressure of a pending nuclear attack from reading the wrong combination of letters/numerals. 00000 provided a simple, "clean" visual easily verified at a glance, (i.e., the accidental entering of the wrong numerical instantly standing out visually like a sore thumb in a way it would not in a jumbled "forest" of lower-case & CAPS numbers and letters.)

edutcher said...

I have a feeling Ike trusted the average American soldier more than he'd trust people like Robert Strange McNamara and George Wildman Ball.

AnUnreasonableTroll said...

This is why nuclear arms reduction is always a good thing.

Sure, anything to make the crazies in Teheran feel better.

deborah said...

Gentlemen! This is the war room!

I can definitely believe it was that out of control. I think huge organizations like the military have accountability problems, people dodging responsibility, vying for positions, having trouble coordinating it all. Add in that this was in a NATO context, and the whole nuke thing was new.

I don't mean people like vx, who were doing stellar duty, but on the larger scale of integrating masses of detail.

And currently, according to the last section I quoted, problems at Malmstrom AFB, indicate a terrible leadership and morale problem.

Thanks for the insight into your work, virgil. Interesting and gratifying to know that the worry was not being able to launch in time.

deborah said...

Bago:
"You can't believe that things were that lax for all those years with no incidents or theft of the most valuable items on the planet and then still be an atheist."

The thought crossed my mind as I was reading.

edutcher said...

deborah said...

And currently, according to the last section I quoted, problems at Malmstrom AFB, indicate a terrible leadership and morale problem.

Hmmm, leadership and morale problem.

Where have we seen this before?

deborah said...

I here ya Ed, but I think this has been going on longer than Obama, probably.

ken in tx said...

During my AF career, crazy people did not make it past colonel. I had two bird colonel bosses who were forced out for being unstable. One of them was taken out of his office, stiff as a board, to the base hospital. This was after all the Chief Master Sergeants in the maintenance complex marched into his office and chewed his ass out. Guys like that never had a chance to make that first star.

deborah said...

Ken, I understand there's a problem in the military with colonels who should be promoted, for the vigor of the force, being passed over in favor of yes-men who are willing to play the political games.

Aridog said...

Deborah and Ken in SC

....I have said before and say it again, since the turn of the century, I do NOT trust any officer above the rank of Lieutenant Colonel in general...and I was in daily contact with them, and Colonels and higher.

I had one instance where my Commanding General was dragged off to Walter Reed to the ward where the doors have no handles on the inside, etc. He would have been my commander if I had deployed to Iraq when he did, as was strongly suggest I do. F-that....that sloven meat-head fucked, literally, the wife of one of my subordinates, in his drunken haze. Eventually I had to discipline and discharge said subordinate because of his emotional reactions to all the shit....several warnings to cease using military connectivity to debate his divorce. Yeah, his wife copied him to Office of Counsel / Judge ADvocate and I had to react, after three cautions it was out the door.

Since CY2000 I have no use for any existing generals...all of the good are gone, or subdued. The demise began under Bush & Gate when they dumped USMC Gen Peter Pace as Chair JCS. Blow-hards like McChrystal and Petraeus (who couldn't keep his dick in his pants either) managed to adroitly get twice as many men killed in their 3 years in command in Afghaniland as the entire prior 7 years. Oh, fucking yeah, bitches...hope you die in a ditch. Just for fun, someone go ask General "Tweedle Dee" Dempsey just how and where he earned that Combat Action Badge (bayonet inside a wreath)he wears?

A few of the Colonels were stalwart and not already corrupted by the star-effect (e.g., getting the star was more important than doing the right things, instead doing what it took to make some cake eating fuck face give that star and get it approved by...Congress.)And those stalwart Colonels retired as Colonels...no star for them.

Makes me feel to puke, except it also scares the shit out of me. Today's senior chain of command is corrupt beyond anything you can imagine...it worked better when you had less centraslization and politicization, becasue then you had men who took their oaths seriously and tried to do the right thing.

No WWIII was started...that is their prooof.

You better hope WWIII is not started today, becasue I doubt the cake eaters in charge could defend Boston from the Duchy of Grand Fenwick, and even then they'd need Halliburton/KBR on site before they could land. I recall them in 2003, do you?

deborah said...

No, I didn't turn my laser focus on the Iraq war till 2007, where the first general brought to my attention was Petraeus mugging for the camera in Iraq.