Via Godfather Politics...
The following is from Front Page Magazine. The entire article is worth your time to read:
"Before 9/11, the trial run for the attack was the World Trade Center bombing. The key figures in that attack, from Ramzi Yousef, the nephew of 9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, to the Blind Sheikh, whose ambitious plans involved bombing New York bridges and tunnels, asked for political asylum.
"Ramzi Yousef showed up with a fake passport and claimed to be an Iraqi refugee seeking political asylum. He was released on his own recognizance and told to show up for a hearing. He never did.
"His co-conspirator, Ahmed Ajaj, went on filing for political asylum even while under arrest for his role in the World Trade Center bombing. Their pals, Mahmud Abouhalima, who routinely told passengers that 'In Islam, the people are the weapons,' and Mohammed Salameh, were illegal aliens who had applied for amnesty as agricultural workers. But they didn’t go on to pick lettuce or blueberries."
Consider that the Boston bombers were "actually 'poor refugees.'” The Washington Post reported:
"With their baseball hats and sauntering gaits, they appeared to friends and neighbors like ordinary American boys. But the Boston bombing suspects were refugees from another world — the blood, rubble and dirty wars of the Russian Caucasus."
“Our enemy now is Islamic terrorism, and these people are coming from a country filled with Islamic terrorists,” said Representative Peter T. King, Republican of New York. “We don’t want another Boston Marathon bombing situation.”Do you trust the people that couldn't build a website with 600 million dollars to do a thorough background check on hundreds of thousands of people from all over the Islamic world?
16 comments:
Yes they were. So are those Somalis who are so assimilated in Minnesota you would think they were all Mary Tyler Moore.
Never forget the lessons of the past...
A very salient point and one that should be rammed down the throats of anybody who throws the, "You have no heart", line.
Disturbing to me is that almost every photograph I've seen of the current Syrian "refugees" are of men age 18-35 or so. They want to escape something they are unwilling to fight against? Is that it? They want "refuge" while someone else cleans up their mess? Or is the official beginning of the militant Islamic invasion of Europe and North America? Are these refugees mostly stooges as cover for the militants embedded in their group? Can you distinguish between a Shia' Muslim and a Sunni Muslim (I live among them and it is rather hard to do)...the latter may be ISIL and the former Iran's proxy Hezbollah. If so, I know a few hundred Muslims, already legal immigrants, who will NOT be happy about it....they were real refugees who came here with hope and came legally. Now the west is gong to invite in those they thought they'd escaped?
Do I trust feds who couldn't build a decent database for $600 Million to create a solid one for vetting refugees? NO and hell no. I worked as a "Fed" for way to long to think otherwise...so awkwardly bad that I had to write local databases for local use just to survive the idiocy...plus cut our local administrative costs by as much as 70%. Senior bureaucrats (SES+) don't like that sort of performance...they prefer awkward time consuming tedious crap that expands their kingdoms.
Next...do you know who will be reviewing the new Db if created? Some GS-5 or GS-7 new hire with zero experience, that's who. Good luck.
But they all vote for democrats. so shut up.
Clearly the problem with the $600 billion was that it just wasn't enough money. If you fail with $600 billion, then success is probably just a few hundred billion more away. Isn't that obvious?
Isn't it becoming our political modus operandi in the country to choose the stupidest plan, spend the most possible, and fail miserably, without ever seeing a "teaching moment". It's the new American Way. I prefer experience in people hired for a job, but every time I hear about lack of political experience concerning a political candidate, I don't think of a lack of effective intelligent experience. I think of a lack of stupid, corrupt, wasteful expertise. We can risk that.
Salient contrast...
Titanic survival rates: women 75%, children 50%, adult men 19% http://www.icyousee.org/titanic.html
According to the UN, 72% of those fleeing to Europe in this crisis are men, only 13% women and 15% children.
http://on.wsj.com/1M0AJNp
We're all just slaves to big government corruption and money waste. Letting in a few terrorists is just collateral damage for the greater common good of ... free sh*t and Ellen.
So lots of men leave a country because they are not willing to fight for their home or their family. They leave their wives and children behind to be raped and murdered. Welcome. We hope you can become a helpful part of our social fabric. We need good men like yourselves.
You want to show compassion, spend money on safe camps for them in Jordan, Turkey and (why not) the Gulf States. Letting them into Europe to collect welfare and shift the culture? Insanity.
And that drowned toddler was killed by his father's recklessness and stupidity. I feel sorry for them, but not enough to be equally reckless and stupid (which is what Merkel is doing to her country).
Ah, but one excuse was that the UN "ran out of money" to fund the refugee camps in Turkey. The. UN. Ran. Out. Of. Money.
No, it didn't.
On a good day, that excuse is a regular lie. On a bad day, the UN purposely stopped funding the refugee camps so as to trigger this migration.
The father of the drowned toddler/dead poster child for compassion signalling was a human smuggler and was piloting the boat. You have to dig down through layers and layers of lies, like an archaeologist, to get to the truth by which time everyone is in tears and your money has been appropriated and redistributed by Those Who Know Better. It will not be returned.
They don't care what excuses or reasons they will use to get in and attack from within. Our own immigration laws are our own trojan horses. No one is willing to say, "Hey, we will help you, but not here, but from where you are now."
No one is willing to say, "Hey, we will help you, but not here, but from where you are now."
Sure they are, the UN says it to Afrikans all the time, but then Africa doesn't have as much oil.
How many refugees is Mexico accepting?
Our "leaders" and the vast majority of the American public are so suicidely naive about this topic that it sickens me... which is why I am laying in "mass quantities" of Barbancourt 5-Star..
Post a Comment