My dogs had a similar response:
Tough crowd!
Three years ago, Shawn Musgrave kicked off MuckRock’s first big FOIA (Freedom Of Information Act) project - the Drone Census, which looked into how police departments across the country were approaching the idea of utilizing the tech as a law enforcement tool. Often, this turned out to be more theory than practice.
Though the Census tracked down drone use to departments as small as the Georgia Tech police, several towns were confused by project, and others outright resented the idea that they’d want anything to do with silly flying toys.
And then there was Brockton.
Two months after the initial request, Brockton Police Department responded with an email that was blank except for a single attachment, “drones.pdf.”
The document contained an photo of the BPD’s fleet in action …
News from the past.Well Twitter, looks like we're all screwed. pic.twitter.com/QYqb3DA4zI— The Refined Ruffian (@CulturedRuffian) June 19, 2016
An understandable mistake in North Korea. pic.twitter.com/uWLVkY7mXz
— Andrew Malcolm (@AHMalcolm) January 9, 2016
| device | HUMOR | WIT | SATIRE | SARCASM | INVECTIVE | IRONY | CYNICISM | SARDONIC |
| motive/aim | discovery | throwing light | amendment | inflicting pain | discredit | exclusiveness | self-justification | self-relief |
| province | human nature | words & ideas | morals & manners | faults & foibles | misconduct | statement of facts | morals | adversity |
| method/means | observation | surprise | accentuation | inversion | direct statement | mystification | exposure of nakedness | pessimism |
| audience | the sympathetic | the intelligent | the self-satisfied | victim & bystander | the public | an inner circle | the respectable | the self |
Interestingly, the entire reason the papers exist in the first place is because of an MIT-made program called SCIgen, a piece of software created in 2005 for the sole purpose of proving that conferences constantly accept nonsensical papers. And, of course, "to maximize amusement." Anyone can download it and use it, so no one is quite sure exactly who is behind the gibberish discovered thus far—and real scientists names are used as the supposed "authors."via Gizmodo
![]() |
| h/t Allen S |
.@JessicaValenti What I most enjoy about your Twitter feed is the sophistication and nuance.
— jon gabriel (@exjon) June 30, 2014