It's all about the guns.....

Two big events regarding the Second Amendment have transpired the last few days.

First off, the Republican traitors in the Senate have bent over and took it up the ass from the Democratic gun grabbers. These quislings are using the same lies they used for gay marriage. "It's not that big a deal. It is a reasonable compromise. It will not have any other effect or change."

It is all lies. You give an inch, and they take a mile. Red Flag laws will be used to seize guns from anyone who does not toe the liberal line. You are seeing the effect with the torture and crimes being committed against the Jan 6 patriots who were only exercising their first amendment rights. The constitution means nothing to these scum bags. 

Why is the Second Amendment the only one that can be abrogated without a constitutional amendment. Why can't we just legislate a return to slavery? I mean most of the Mexicans that the elite Karens abuse are basically slaves. Their nannies and gardeners are the direct equivalents of Aunt Jemina and Uncle Ben. Why not stop women from voting on certain issues? A judge can decide without due process.  I don't know maybe just when they are on the rag. You know a red rag law. They don't have good judgement when their hormones are in control. That is a reasonable compromise, right?

Or is that ridiculous bullshit like this new gun compromise?

They only solace we have is the bare minimum of votes we have on the Court thanks to the God Emperor of the Cherry Blossom Throne. Their decision to invalidate the onerous gun laws of New York state and other jurisdictions that require licenses to own or carry guns is the only bright spot in the increasing move toward disarming normal Americans. I am sure that New York State will ignore it and there are many more fights to come but at least we have a decision on the books that we can use in the future. 

It is all not going to end well.

We need to take the lessons of Lucas McCain to heart and just start dealing with the people who are stealing our rights out from under us. It's the only solution.

Restaurant Owner Refuses To Serve Minority Group

The owner of  Backstreets Pub & Deli in Clemson put this sign in his window:

Plus, the owner called gun owners losers and douche bags.  Such a hater.

It's clear the owner does not want business from gun owners even though they have concealed carry permits simply because they choose to exercise their rights. 

It's like refusing to bake someone a cake because you disagree with them.  I mean, if you have a business license, you have to serve everybody regardless of your own opinion, right?  That's what the courts have decreed.

Read more.

The treaty's Article 5 requires nations to "establish and maintain a national control system"...

including a "national control list." Article 10 requires signatories "to regulate brokering" of conventional arms. The treaty offers no guarantee for individual rights...

 From an excellent article by John Bolton and John Yoo in the WSJ, concerning the UN Arms Trade Treaty, which President Obama has promised to sign.

But surely this treaty is entirely concerned with arms trade between nations, right?

Gun-control advocates will use these provisions to argue that the U.S. must enact measures such as a national gun registry, licenses for guns and ammunition sales, universal background checks, and even a ban of certain weapons. The treaty thus provides the Obama administration with an end-run around Congress to reach these gun-control holy grails.

(Bold for emphasis mine.)  Remember when garage mahal laughed off any suggestion that any Democrat at any level intended to advance gun control?  Paranoid wing nuts, he said.  Good times.

But wait -- how could the President implement elements of a treaty that seeks to impose unconstitutional restrictions on our liberty?

...treaties therefore aren't textually subject to the limits on Congress's power. Treaties still receive the force of law under the Supremacy Clause, which declares that "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land." Some have argued over the years that this difference in language between laws and treaties allows the latter to sweep more broadly than the former.

... President Obama could issue executive orders for a gun registry and background checks, on the claim that he is implementing the treaty.

 But we still have a chance:

Fortunately the Framers required that the president submit all significant international agreements to the Senate...

 ...Whooo, that's a relief.  The senate....where the Democrats have a 52-46 majority; plus "independents" Bernie Sanders and Angus King (that makes 54).  Oh, and those 46 Republicans include 16 RINOs that voted to proceed with gun control legislation in April.

Tonight, we drink.  We drink tequila.  Prepare yourselves.