Overheard at Lem's:
The dictionary of Etymology tells me that the history of the word 'story' holds meanings of 'wise-man' and the verb 'to see'. link
Sufficiently piqued, I looked into that assertion. My
Oxford Dictionary Of The English Language (dead tree edition), teaches that the word "story" comes to us from the word history* which in turn roots back in the Latin word
historia meaning a "recital of events" and a "narrative designed for entertainment." There is more detail under the word history -- "knowing, learned, wise man, judge' -- but nothing about the verb "to see." That verb -- meaning "to perceive with the eyes" -- is very old, but there's no link to the word "story" that I can see. Interestingly, I learned that the word "to see" is linked to the Latin word
sequi meaning "to follow" (
cf. sequel) in the sense of "to follow with the eyes." Cool.
Some time ago, I wrote on the kinship between the words "face" and the verb "to view" (
cf. visage)
both in German and in English. Perhaps there is a missing link in German. The German word for "history,"
die Geschichte, looks like the German word for "face,"
das Gesicht. Alas, I find no connection between "story" and "to see." There is the notion of a "seer of visions" which nicely convolutes "to see" and "face" (visage), but the tense is wrong: an historian looks backwards while a visionary looks forwards.
One last thing that I learned is that the two words "story" and "storey" (British spelling) are closely related. "Story" as in "second or third story" essentially means "any of the parts one above another of which a building consists." That meaning came from tiered "stories" presented in the Middle Ages:
______________________________
*The shortening of "history" to "story" reminds me of
Hispania morphing into Spain.