A tweet directs readers to Bare Naked Islam that details a story covered on Right Wing News. They both say the same thing with slightly different angles. They both refer to each other.
An Arizona man, a biker named John Ritzheimer is responding to the incident incited by Pamela Geller in Garland Texas (that was incited by an Islamic group hosting a free speech conference at that same site.)
The difference here is Ritzheimer is taking his effort directly to the Arizona mosque where to two jihadists went. He is bringing together an armed biker group for the purpose of intimidating mosque attendees directly.
His plan has a serious hole in it right at the start in that he expects a large group of bikers to meet in the parking lot of a nearby Denny's. One hundred twenty-eight so far on his Facebook page. Dragging Denny's into his act seems a bad idea. Those worshippers might even be Denny's customers. Plus they intend to monopolize the lot to hold their own drawing contest. I don't see that working.
The Bare Naked Islam site lists objections that liberals make to all this. It's a bit confusing, he does indicate where he switches from supporting the event to showing the objections of opponents. He provides his own commentary in red along with it. Comments are all for the provoked confrontation.
Right Wing News makes a point of discussing the essential differences between the Geller event in Garland and this one completely out of her hands, inspired by her, planned for Phoenix Arizona.
So, what of this outside the little localized circular storm that popped up on the radar of Twitter?
[John Ritzheimer +Arizona] Oh. Look at you. Now I know everything.
Lessons from boyhood. There is no state religion around here and there never will be for if there were then in that moment we cease to exist by becoming something else, and not becoming like a butterfly metamorphosizes into something more splendid airborne and beautiful, more like digested food becoming undirected energy and whole lot of stinking vestigial poop. The reason for that original setup, the genius of it, arises from paranoia, the fear of one person or party accumulating excessive power by attaining both political and religious positions like that French guy, Cardinal Richelieu. That's what the framers avoided, our system consuming itself and turning our system to poop by allowing religious power to cross over and pervade political power.
The thing is, Islam has its laws and we have ours. And now you chose to insert yours within ours and that's fine. It's fine for Muslims to obey both laws. It it not fine for Muslims to impose theirs upon ours. In any way whatsoever. Even the smallest and most easily conceded ways. Even if there was never any intention. No. Flat no. Those extra laws, whatever they are, no matter how tiny, do not apply to anyone other than Muslims who accept them.
Shave a goat. Kill a sheep a certain way. Eat only certain things. Fast when told to. Avoid consuming certain things always. Avoid smoking specific things. Dress a particular way. Avoid dressing in particular ways. Speak in certain ways. Avoid speaking of specific things. Limit architecture and art to geometric patterns and designs only. Whatever your extra religious law, do, enjoy them. Live by them. But do not even think about imposing one single element on anyone else while here. You will get nothing but resistance and that resistance will escalate immediately and exponentially with the slightest input of energy.
Knowing all this makes the slightest religious proscription by you the greatest provocation against me and everyone else. I'll want to kill you myself and I'm a gentle person. I don't even have firearms. They do. I'm gentle sweet and kind and patient to an extent. They're not. I avoid conflict. They look for it and invite it. Just know that your religious proscriptions invite immediate and violent conflict so best to just sit quiet and exercise your pinched religion however you wish. While here.
Boys, I don't know why we set up army men on opposite sides of the room and shoot rubber bands and throw them at each other, but we do. I don't know why we hold Superman in one hand and Godzilla in the other and smash the two together and see which breaks, but we do. I don't know why we toss toys over the roof and assess the damage we make on the other side, but we do. I don't know why we break into teams and shoot paintballs at each other, but we do. I don't know why as boys we devise every weapon possible with materials at hand and use them on each other, but we do. It's a thing that boys do and now the boys are provoked into action and if it happens I can fairly guarantee it will not be clearly thought through.
5 comments:
Pam Geller didn't incite anything. She exercised her freedom of speech. And for exercising her freedom of speech she has been condemned to death (a fatwa) by the delicate creatures she offended. Make a decision. You're either for freedom or you're for freedom BUT. By the way, if you're for freedom BUT you are already a dhimmi, you have already submitted.
The winner of that Pam Geller contest was not bad at all.
Hey, sounds good.
Now the Moslems can show how much they can be trusted.
I;d like to see an event at the OK Corral called "Draw, Mohammad"
Lem said...
The winner of that Pam Geller contest was not bad at all.
His name is Bosh Fawstin. He's a former Muslim and professional cartoonist/comic book artist.
Post a Comment