I can understand if this rises to the level of libel, and it's not clearly labeled a parody, but the approach and resources used are clearly abuse of the power of mayor, and would cost the mayor my vote. I expect it will cost him some, if not enough to lose his job, but then it is Illonois.
April, I love the way she reframes his question twice. In the form of "I'll take your stupid biased-assed question and answer a better one." But she hesitated when Chris ask would it be acceptable for armed men to show up at a home for deportation, where immediate HELL NO, thank you for making my point in reverse you dumbs.
She introduced immigration, so Chris cannot be blamed for schizophrenic subject conflation, she did that. It is liberals who ask "so what about... something only vaguely tangentially related. It is infuriating because it betrays insincere motive is scoring debating points and not inquiring genuinely for more information.
However, the malicious banality inherent in HUGE government action is common in all three, Bundy ranch, where firearms are inappropriate, border protection where they are appropriate, and private homes of immigrants where again they are not appropriate.
It is the insincerity of the Boy Who Didn't Die* that makes him so unwatchable. It took three tries to get through the whole thing, and it's brief.
@chip - It is infuriating because it betrays insincere motive is scoring debating points and not inquiring genuinely for more information. Infuriating. Everyone non-leftwing must take on a defensive posture when talking to the leftwing press. It's all gotcha all the time now.
10 comments:
I can understand if this rises to the level of libel, and it's not clearly labeled a parody, but the approach and resources used are clearly abuse of the power of mayor, and would cost the mayor my vote. I expect it will cost him some, if not enough to lose his job, but then it is Illonois.
bagoh20 said...
but then it is Illonois.
But then he is a Republican.
ARM, That will make sure that he is held to a higher standard. Good point.
"But then he is a Republican."
Maybe, maybe not.
2013
2009
2005
Oh, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?
OT: this is awesome. A female assembly woman standing up to the male version Rachel Maddow in an MSNBC interview.
This is how you stand your ground against a big government Harry Reid supporting leftist.
April, I love the way she reframes his question twice. In the form of "I'll take your stupid biased-assed question and answer a better one." But she hesitated when Chris ask would it be acceptable for armed men to show up at a home for deportation, where immediate HELL NO, thank you for making my point in reverse you dumbs.
She introduced immigration, so Chris cannot be blamed for schizophrenic subject conflation, she did that. It is liberals who ask "so what about... something only vaguely tangentially related. It is infuriating because it betrays insincere motive is scoring debating points and not inquiring genuinely for more information.
However, the malicious banality inherent in HUGE government action is common in all three, Bundy ranch, where firearms are inappropriate, border protection where they are appropriate, and private homes of immigrants where again they are not appropriate.
It is the insincerity of the Boy Who Didn't Die* that makes him so unwatchable. It took three tries to get through the whole thing, and it's brief.
*H. Potter
Rabel said...
Maybe,
He's definitely Republican. Everyone was 'independent' on those links.
ARM, I think you're right but I can't find anything definitive.
@chip - It is infuriating because it betrays insincere motive is scoring debating points and not inquiring genuinely for more information.
Infuriating.
Everyone non-leftwing must take on a defensive posture when talking to the leftwing press. It's all gotcha all the time now.
Post a Comment