Speaking of Althouse, now that July is nearly over, does anybody have the latest traffic rankings? I would guess that the full effect will not be felt until at least August, after the comments have been off for the entire recording period, but am curious.
And now, her little lawnboy approved "moderated comments" do not count as a comment section.
So, Lem, since you brought up the name we're not supposed to use, one of the 87 thousand banned words according to Larry, does that mean he's going to arrive soon?
Like clicking your heels together three times. Or something?
Pity A. didn't first do what she's now doing -- opening up just some of her posts for moderated comments -- instead of locking the door on all of us without warning.
And as for Huma, the notion that she could now be some pathbreaker is so stupid I don't know where it came from. Some people — who are they? — got fixated on her — why? Because she's somewhat attractive? Because she's somewhat attractive and Muslim? Because she's somewhat attractive, Muslim, and close to Hillary? I'd like those people to confess what they're so enamored about. I bet they won't, because it's nothing but stupidity.
Althouse is upset that people might want to be protective of Huma? The way she said sometimes she was driven to feel protective towards Obama?
I don't know how re-energized Ann is, but if anybody seriously believes the Hildabeast didn't need Willie for everything she's done in her life, they're dreaming.
As Katie Pavlich put it:
The funny thing about Hillary Clinton is how vastly her reputation exceeds her accomplishments. In reality, the only reason anyone has heard of her is that she married Bill Clinton. Otherwise, she would have toiled away as an obscure, reasonably competent if obnoxious lawyer. She was a relatively unpopular First Lady who is best remembered for being embarrassed by her husband’s serial infidelities. She served a brief term as a Senator from New York, a role in which she achieved nothing. Then she lost the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama, and punched her ticket during a singularly unsuccessful stint as Secretary of State. Never has she had an original thought, formulated a successful strategy, or stepped out of the shadow of her singular husband.
As longs as its not the whole post legally I'm permitted to quote her
Lem.
This is the Internet. Not a copyrighted published book. Even then you can quote the author without their permission, as long as you nicely give attribution to the author as to who wrote it and where you got the quote.
You don't need "permission" to quote something that someone just strewed out onto the Internet. Of course it is nice to give credit to that person, but....you do not need to grovel or ask permission.
Quote Althouse all you like. I see no problem with that. Make links if you like so others can go to the whole article... if they like.
Just like Inga, who somehow thinks that photos that she posted or that her daughters posted onto the Internet onto unprotected sites are somehow private. It is the Internet. There are ways to keep your photos and your writings private. Blogger and Pinterest are not those ways.
Anyway. the thing here is that Althouse seems to have lost her edge, a little bit.
Althouse, inadvertently, left herself vulnerable there... criticizing people for doing something, she, on more than one occasion, announced she did herself.
Belmont Club on the NYT noticing that Obama is the wrecking ball to end all wrecking balls :
It has finally occurred to them that the US can lose in the Middle East and beyond; that America can be defeated after all, if they behave stupidly enough.
But one must let them come to this realization themselves, just as if they were the first persons to think of it. Their vanity must be given its due. Because it is all they have. It impelled them to make history’s most stupid luxury purchase: the elevation of Barack Obama to President of the United States. That memory is embarassment enough for anyone. Let them eat crow in peace.
Lem back when I was there she always seemed to respond and to reward those that hated her most.
I was actually scared she would pick someone that was...like that.
At least Meade wasn't like that to her.
Also I tried to rehash the whole thing--haven't been there in years--so I waded through it all backwards--and couldn't process all of it.
After awhile I went with my gut instinct, and/or revulsion at a point where she was treating a commenter that I knew had absolutely adored her for years--so repulsively poorly.
I quit right there.
(It's weird that another commenter had issue with that exact same place in the turmoil)
Every once in awhile I get afraid that I might have judged it wrong but then--
Laurence comes here and assures me that I have not.
What is going to be hard for people is they will be afraid to get attached to this place because they will fear getting the door slammed on them or the rug pulled out from under them--again.
I remember on "Election" Day, long before the polls closed, Ace saying, "But remember: These are just polls. Surveys. And they skew more Democratic than the actual polls do".
I remember on "Election" Day, long before the polls closed, Ace saying, "But remember: These are just polls. Surveys. And they skew more Democratic than the actual polls do".
IOW, these are to support the meme
**************
edutcher--
You don't believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
(I don't think CNN would be motivated to obscure the numbers in that direction.)
rhhardin said... Well, the numbers are going to have to add up to what they summarized.
This is going to involve women voting differently than men.
The nation can't survive that.
*******************
rhhardin--
That brings up an interesting point.
It is a pluralistic society like no other on earth and yet it has survived thus far.
It is kind of a miracle.
You are correct--taking advantage of the differences and pitting one group against the other will probably kill it if politicians continue to exploit that.
And as for Huma, the notion that she could now be some pathbreaker is so stupid I don't know where it came from. Some people — who are they? — got fixated on her — why?
The fascination with Huma among the media elites predates her husband's disgrace. I read a fawning article about her once in the New York Times and the only thing I took away from it is that she is awesome because she marvelous taste in handbags.
I like to take red bell peppers and cut evenly into strips, toss olive oil all over, salt, turn the heat up on a pan real hot and basically burn them on one side so each pepper strip has a burn stripe and softened but not fully softened.
Then lemon bang dressing right there with the olive oil already covering them.
I've served that several times and it gets people each time.
Hi. Just a note to say I tried your red bell pepper idea and it works really well, especially if you substitute red bell peppers with pumpkin and boil it for an hour instead of frying in a pan on hot until it softens, and instead of salt, I used Mother Teresa's celery and turmeric fennel-salt Madras curry. And I served it on pancakes and coated with whipped cream. Turned out great. Even the dog thought it was good.
I think Huma is working for the Muslim Brotherhood. Look at who her father was and whot her mother is.
I think the marriage was for The Cause, though Weiner didn't know it - they saw him as a rising star before they knew he had some serious public sex misbehavior issues. They are trying to keep going thinking the mayor's office, then the governor's then ... Well we all know that's not going to work, but maybe they thought it would.
The left loves Muslims. She represents (represented) what they wanted to see of Muslim women ... classy, fashionable, "smart." AS far as what the Brotherhood got? She was definitely in Hillary's inner circle -- she drew the circles -- which gave her access to A LOT OF INSIDE CONFIDENTIAL info about the US.
I avoid conspiracy stuff but her position is all just too sonvenient.
Shot of man slightly tilting his head as he says, "I voted for Obama because I think he really wants to help people."
Cut to black screen with white text and voiceover, "BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Shot of a woman looking very stylish as she says, "I voted for Obama because he cares about women."
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Shot of another woman looking intellectual, "I voted for Obama because he is so intelligent."
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Now show the three of them lined up in their own panes.
"BAD VOTE, YOU! BAD VOTE, YOU! BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Cut to a diagram of the brain.
"This election season, make them all say, 'Good vote, you!' [limbic system in diagram lights up] Try to put aside your initial feelings and work through the consequences of what you support. [limbic system darkens, frontal lobes light up] Watch how your feelings change!
Cut to voice over person:
"Vote rationally this year and nobody will be able to say..."
Cut to group of people (advertising diversity shot, so old, young, babies, all races, disabled people, poor, rich, etc.) who point and yell,
Our Arkansas Traveler reminds us once again that both wit and wisdom reside in the Ozarks--especially in the brain of an idiosyncratic free-thnker by the name of Freeman Hunt, You are well-named m'lady, lol.
I think Huma is working for the Muslim Brotherhood. Look at who her father was and whot her mother is.
I think the marriage was for The Cause, though Weiner didn't know it - they saw him as a rising star before they knew he had some serious public sex misbehavior issues. They are trying to keep going thinking the mayor's office, then the governor's then ... Well we all know that's not going to work, but maybe they thought it would.
JAL is spot-on here.
Unless Huma's family has disavowed her -- and they haven't -- her marriage is about power and the MB. Women from prominent MB families don't marry American Jews without repercussions. This is not "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?" Muslim Brotherhood-style.
The left meets these concerns with cries of conspiracy-thinking and McCarthyism but no substantive arguments.
Guys, we've seen enough polls that are skewed, stacked, and anything else you care to name.
Like everything else out of the media, I don't trust it.
As to this particular number, the whole "all he needed was 10 - 15% more" bit strikes me as a dodge.
Right after the "election", the numbers were a lot closer. Then another set of figures comes out making look a lot better for the Choom Gang.
Again, it's my feeling the Romster was leading and the vote fraud machine had to be cranked up. As I've said, all the revelations the last few months tend to bear that out.
Considering how much they've participated in the race-baiting of the last year or so, maybe it's to support story lines like the Zimmerman verdict was a whitewash because most of the jurors were typical Romney supporters.
A certain blogger: "After I shut off the comments, I had to deal with email and writing on other sites, and I saw some people whom I had valued as guests griping about what I did to them, showing little appreciation for what I had given for 9 years."
Do you think she might be a wee bitter? And narcissistic...
Rh, I have read that some physicists postulate there was/is a point during the Big Bang that was/is before the existence of time. How do you know that there was/is not a point before the existence of numbers?
139 comments:
Speaking of Althouse, now that July is nearly over, does anybody have the latest traffic rankings? I would guess that the full effect will not be felt until at least August, after the comments have been off for the entire recording period, but am curious.
And now, her little lawnboy approved "moderated comments" do not count as a comment section.
So, Lem, since you brought up the name we're not supposed to use, one of the 87 thousand banned words according to Larry, does that mean he's going to arrive soon?
Like clicking your heels together three times. Or something?
I do love peppers. They are the delight of late summer, along with tomatoes, basil, and sweet tasty corn.
Althouse sounds re-energized.
Damn!
Dude!
Seriously!
Althouse sounds re-energized.
I'm pleased for you, her and Larry.
Yeah. Lem, she sounds pretty good.
"Damn! Dude! Seriously!"
When I said I don't harbor any ill will, I meant it. I wasn't just saying that.
Yeah. Lem, she sounds pretty good.
Also pleased for Inga.
But that's it. Anyone else that's happy is going to have to be covered under a blanket "and whoever else" statement.
Approved comments by sycophant commenters. Yabba Dabba Doo.
Good for you my friend. Sorry I said anything. You just startled me.
Never mind.
Its all good trooper.
Have fun with it Lem.
Pity A. didn't first do what she's now doing -- opening up just some of her posts for moderated comments -- instead of locking the door on all of us without warning.
I mean you are a Red Sox fan so I get it!
No worries amigo!
Did you take the picture Lem?
Cool.
Peppers are fun. But I am not much for the hot ones.
Were feminists already independent of men in the 80s?
There's no open comments so I don't even think about it.
NOW meetings in the 70s were places to pick up babes.
Qualified women showed up in the mid 80s and wound up on the women's workplace issues committee.
Guys were just working with no committee.
There were mandatory annual awareness seminars.
I was banned from those.
Moderated comments aren't comments.
I have permission to quote her.
And as for Huma, the notion that she could now be some pathbreaker is so stupid I don't know where it came from. Some people — who are they? — got fixated on her — why? Because she's somewhat attractive? Because she's somewhat attractive and Muslim? Because she's somewhat attractive, Muslim, and close to Hillary? I'd like those people to confess what they're so enamored about. I bet they won't, because it's nothing but stupidity.
Althouse is upset that people might want to be protective of Huma?
The way she said sometimes she was driven to feel protective towards Obama?
Or is it that protection is a one way street?
Femenism is very convoluted.
Permission?
Moderated comments aren't comments.
It's more unchecked power.
As longs as its not the whole post legally I'm permitted to quote her.
Legallly?
I don't know how re-energized Ann is, but if anybody seriously believes the Hildabeast didn't need Willie for everything she's done in her life, they're dreaming.
As Katie Pavlich put it:
The funny thing about Hillary Clinton is how vastly her reputation exceeds her accomplishments. In reality, the only reason anyone has heard of her is that she married Bill Clinton. Otherwise, she would have toiled away as an obscure, reasonably competent if obnoxious lawyer. She was a relatively unpopular First Lady who is best remembered for being embarrassed by her husband’s serial infidelities. She served a brief term as a Senator from New York, a role in which she achieved nothing. Then she lost the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama, and punched her ticket during a singularly unsuccessful stint as Secretary of State. Never has she had an original thought, formulated a successful strategy, or stepped out of the shadow of her singular husband.
I am glad you have permission. That is very nice. Salud!
Trooper, what do I know about blogging?
Eventually the colonies had to gain their Independence from the monarchy---
of course they had to learn the principle of--
united we stand divided we fall.
Then there was the Cold War.
I'm dusting off my theory of mutually assured destruction, Clausewitz's Everything I Learned --I Learned from the Playground Bully!--
and--I am re-watching my favorite episode of Million Dollar Listing New York--
I'm In The Pool-Bitch!
Lem I love you like a brother. Maybe you should consult with your co-bloggers.
I think you have more leeway than you think. That's all.
As longs as its not the whole post legally I'm permitted to quote her
Lem.
This is the Internet. Not a copyrighted published book. Even then you can quote the author without their permission, as long as you nicely give attribution to the author as to who wrote it and where you got the quote.
You don't need "permission" to quote something that someone just strewed out onto the Internet. Of course it is nice to give credit to that person, but....you do not need to grovel or ask permission.
Quote Althouse all you like. I see no problem with that. Make links if you like so others can go to the whole article... if they like.
Just like Inga, who somehow thinks that photos that she posted or that her daughters posted onto the Internet onto unprotected sites are somehow private. It is the Internet. There are ways to keep your photos and your writings private. Blogger and Pinterest are not those ways.
You do not need anyone's permission.
Anyway. the thing here is that Althouse seems to have lost her edge, a little bit.
Althouse, inadvertently, left herself vulnerable there... criticizing people for doing something, she, on more than one occasion, announced she did herself.
--btw
I am not sure if I want to play guess who bought the dildo through Lem's portal.
That's unfair to Meade.
Is she re-energized or has she lost her edge?
Which?
Althouse should be treated like any other blogger.
Equal.
And the criticisim is particularly hard....
Stupidly.
1. lacking ordinary quickness and keenness of mind; dull.
2. characterized by or proceeding from mental dullness; foolish; senseless: a stupid question.
3. tediously dull, especially due to lack of meaning or sense; inane; pointless: a stupid party.
4. annoying or irritating; troublesome: Turn off that stupid radio.
5. in a state of stupor; stupefied: stupid from fatigue.
Did Althouse just call herself these vile things?
So I like that Lem is rejecting Laurence's demands.
Never pay ransom.
Is she re-energized or has she lost her edge?
I hadn't read the post carefully.
When I saw that Rh seemed to be commenting on it, I want back and found that quote begging to be commented on.
Althouse should be treated like any other blogger.
So that means I can say the same kind of stuff about her that I say about Trooper York and Evi?
No Trooper is a guy, you have to be nice to him.
Belmont Club on the NYT noticing that Obama is the wrecking ball to end all wrecking balls :
It has finally occurred to them that the US can lose in the Middle East and beyond; that America can be defeated after all, if they behave stupidly enough.
But one must let them come to this realization themselves, just as if they were the first persons to think of it. Their vanity must be given its due. Because it is all they have. It impelled them to make history’s most stupid luxury purchase: the elevation of Barack Obama to President of the United States. That memory is embarassment enough for anyone. Let them eat crow in peace.
Did Althouse just call herself these vile things?
************
Lem back when I was there she always seemed to respond and to reward those that hated her most.
I was actually scared she would pick someone that was...like that.
At least Meade wasn't like that to her.
Also I tried to rehash the whole thing--haven't been there in years--so I waded through it all backwards--and couldn't process all of it.
After awhile I went with my gut instinct, and/or revulsion at a point where she was treating a commenter that I knew had absolutely adored her for years--so repulsively poorly.
I quit right there.
(It's weird that another commenter had issue with that exact same place in the turmoil)
Every once in awhile I get afraid that I might have judged it wrong but then--
Laurence comes here and assures me that I have not.
So--there is grace in that I guess.
CEO-MMP said...
Althouse should be treated like any other blogger.
So that means I can say the same kind of stuff about her that I say about Trooper York and Evi?
***********
You can say the same things that she has said about anyone else.
Yes--she caught a lot of people that couldn't resist.
She will always get the numbers but the numbers are of very little import.
You can't take the numbers with you.
No Trooper is a guy, you have to be nice to him.
Is there proof of that somewhere?
Lem--
What is going to be hard for people is they will be afraid to get attached to this place because they will fear getting the door slammed on them or the rug pulled out from under them--again.
My goal for feminism is to induce it to include thinking like a man when it comes to politics.
Otherwise women can't be taken seriously as adults.
Althouse lost her feedback, not her edge.
rhhardin said...
My goal for feminism is to induce it to include thinking like a man when it comes to politics.
Otherwise women can't be taken seriously as adults.
**********
rhhardin
Would you be surprised to find out that Romney won a majority of the female white vote?
What is your assumption about that?
Numbers preexisted the universe and will outlast it.
Just speaking as a math guy.
Gender gap just taking the top google choice
Is there proof of that somewhere?
Only a guy would say he is a Yankee.
rhhardin
The exit polls from CNN are here
cnn.com--2012 election results
Romney won 56% of the white women vote.
He only got 33% of the Latino men and 5% of the black men.
My goal for feminism is to induce it to include thinking like a man when it comes to politics.
For that they would have to admit that at the very least Feminism has made excessive, if not dam near stupid demands.
Minorities are interest groups, misguided but nevertheless interest groups.
Women are spread across groups like men, except for estrogen.
Turn off the estrogen in politics, has to be the lesson. It's idiocy.
I'll let you reconcile your data with mine.
If you can't turn off the estrogen in politics, you're not a serious adult.
We need estrogen awareness seminars for women.
For that they would have to admit that at the very least Feminism has made excessive, if not dam near stupid demands.
Feminist would have to admit that their ideas are completely irrational and against human nature in most aspects of radical feminism.
Lem said...
Is there proof of that somewhere?
Only a guy would say he is a Yankee.
******
LOL!
I get those two man whores on that team mixed up--
Jeter and what's his nuts?
I'm sure that is because I am a racist.
Ha!
I mean estrogen is fine in life, slamming of doors and so forth. Guys can deal with that.
Just not politics.
It makes democracy unstable.
rhhardin said...
Minorities are interest groups, misguided but nevertheless interest groups.
Women are spread across groups like men, except for estrogen.
Turn off the estrogen in politics, has to be the lesson. It's idiocy.
I'll let you reconcile your data with mine
**************
Yep--haven't done that yet--sorry.
I had to answer a Skype call in the middle of this.
Although you like estrogen it creates the drama that attracts you to Althouse and Imus--no?
If you can't turn off the estrogen in politics, you're not a serious adult.
Serious adult... that means no pipe line jokes with this comment.
rh-
Actually your link is a story about the very same polling data that I linked.
I think what I linked is better--more graphs less words.
madawaskan said...
The exit polls from CNN are here
Take those with a grain of salt the size of Utah.
I remember on "Election" Day, long before the polls closed, Ace saying, "But remember: These are just polls. Surveys. And they skew more Democratic than the actual polls do".
IOW, these are to support the meme.
I think only a super human could turn off all estrogen.
Until that *miracle* happens politicians will take advantage-- and politicians will never be pure.
It's kind of like you are hoping for your Utopia and that's a communist ideal.
I've heard many times that women elected Obama and men did not.
Obviously it all goes back to some data or other, I guess. I tend to think that's the right summary.
The right summary is what you want.
edutcher said...
madawaskan said...
The exit polls from CNN are here
Take those with a grain of salt the size of Utah.
I remember on "Election" Day, long before the polls closed, Ace saying, "But remember: These are just polls. Surveys. And they skew more Democratic than the actual polls do".
IOW, these are to support the meme
**************
edutcher--
You don't believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
(I don't think CNN would be motivated to obscure the numbers in that direction.)
Just turn off the estrogen in politics.
Training should make that possible, maybe in math classes at puberty, or the women's health class section.
The penalty is that you're not a serious adult, and can be called out and mocked for it.
rhhardin said...
I've heard many times that women elected Obama and men did not.
Obviously it all goes back to some data or other, I guess. I tend to think that's the right summary.
The right summary is what you want.
***************
Correct.
I just think it is more complicated than what you seem to suggest.
The penalty is that you're not a serious adult, and can be called out and mocked for it.
****************
Shaming is of little value these days.
It'll probably take something else.
Well, the numbers are going to have to add up to what they summarized.
This is going to involve women voting differently than men.
The nation can't survive that.
Vicki Hearne promised an expose' on estrogen poisoning under a pseudonym.
Her diagnosis was women's failing is foolishness ("He means well"), and the men's is skepticism.
The former is fatal in politics.
It makes democracy unstable.
*********
Correct.
Democracy in it's pure form will drive a system to its mean. (probably an oversimplification on my part.)
That's why Plato was against it.
Alexander Hamilton too.
Those are some of the reasons we have adopted a Constitutional Republic.
When will there be a post about boobs?
Asking for some friends.
rhhardin said...
Well, the numbers are going to have to add up to what they summarized.
This is going to involve women voting differently than men.
The nation can't survive that.
*******************
rhhardin--
That brings up an interesting point.
It is a pluralistic society like no other on earth and yet it has survived thus far.
It is kind of a miracle.
You are correct--taking advantage of the differences and pitting one group against the other will probably kill it if politicians continue to exploit that.
I don't think they can be stopped.
Michael Haz said...
When will there be a post about boobs?
Asking for some friends.
**********
LOL!
I'm off.
I went off on a bend--sorry.
oy.
"When will there be a post about boobs?"
We've had plenty of posts about the Obama Administration.
Or do you mean the other kind of boobs?
The point isn't that 56% of white women voted for Romney, its that if they'd voted like white men, Romney would've won.
In fact, if only men had voted, Obama (1988), Clinton and Carter would not have gotten elected.
And we're ignoring the damage Female primary voters do in driving both parties to the left.
Women votes also are responsible for absurd obsession with Education and Abortion at the Federal level. Both should be state issues.
Listening to Romney, I sometimes thought he was running for school board chairman.
Women votes also are responsible for absurd obsession with Education and Abortion at the Federal level.
There's some truth to that - especially the abortion issue. Makes me ashamed of my sex.
And as for Huma, the notion that she could now be some pathbreaker is so stupid I don't know where it came from. Some people — who are they? — got fixated on her — why?
The fascination with Huma among the media elites predates her husband's disgrace. I read a fawning article about her once in the New York Times and the only thing I took away from it is that she is awesome because she marvelous taste in handbags.
Do you use many green bell peppers?
They're not ripe.
I like to take red bell peppers and cut evenly into strips, toss olive oil all over, salt, turn the heat up on a pan real hot and basically burn them on one side so each pepper strip has a burn stripe and softened but not fully softened.
Then lemon bang dressing right there with the olive oil already covering them.
I've served that several times and it gets people each time.
Hi. Just a note to say I tried your red bell pepper idea and it works really well, especially if you substitute red bell peppers with pumpkin and boil it for an hour instead of frying in a pan on hot until it softens, and instead of salt, I used Mother Teresa's celery and turmeric fennel-salt Madras curry. And I served it on pancakes and coated with whipped cream. Turned out great. Even the dog thought it was good.
Hi. I buy canned peppers.
madawaskan said...
You don't believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
(I don't think CNN would be motivated to obscure the numbers in that direction.)
At this point, I trust very little from CNN.
I only use orphaned peppers, canned or not.
Well we could talk about pickled peppers instead of boobs.
Although looking at all the women- shouldn't-vote-with-their-hormones posts, we kinda sorta are covering the boob part.
Democracy in *its* pure form will drive a system to its mean.
edutcher said...
madawaskan said...
You don't believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
(I don't think CNN would be motivated to obscure the numbers in that direction.)
At this point, I trust very little from CNN.
*****************
edutcher
So you don't want to believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
Why do you chose to do that?
What would be CNN's reason for lying about that?
And we're ignoring the damage Female primary voters do in driving both parties to the left.
***********
Well how do you solve that?
Bad vote, you!
I think Huma is working for the Muslim Brotherhood. Look at who her father was and whot her mother is.
I think the marriage was for The Cause, though Weiner didn't know it - they saw him as a rising star before they knew he had some serious public sex misbehavior issues. They are trying to keep going thinking the mayor's office, then the governor's then ... Well we all know that's not going to work, but maybe they thought it would.
The left loves Muslims. She represents (represented) what they wanted to see of Muslim women ... classy, fashionable, "smart." AS far as what the Brotherhood got? She was definitely in Hillary's inner circle -- she drew the circles -- which gave her access to A LOT OF INSIDE CONFIDENTIAL info about the US.
I avoid conspiracy stuff but her position is all just too sonvenient.
Darcy said...
Bad vote, you!
*********
LOL!
Lem said...
As longs as its not the whole post legally I'm permitted to quote her.
Lol wut?
rhhardin said...
Numbers preexisted the universe and will outlast it.
Just speaking as a math guy.
I've always believed that time existed before the universe came into being. Just abstract postulation.
Michael Haz said...
When will there be a post about boobs?
Asking for some friends.
You could just go back to troopers and stare at the picture of him in the swimming pool. That should satisfy almost anyone. :D
I gotta get boobs.
Boobs are less important than the meme has it.
It comes from a hot babe convention in cartoons.
Meth, please. People are eating dinner.
Bad vote, you!
Heh. That could be a campaign tagline!
Shot of man slightly tilting his head as he says, "I voted for Obama because I think he really wants to help people."
Cut to black screen with white text and voiceover, "BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Shot of a woman looking very stylish as she says, "I voted for Obama because he cares about women."
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Shot of another woman looking intellectual, "I voted for Obama because he is so intelligent."
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Now show the three of them lined up in their own panes.
"BAD VOTE, YOU! BAD VOTE, YOU! BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Cut to a diagram of the brain.
"This election season, make them all say, 'Good vote, you!' [limbic system in diagram lights up] Try to put aside your initial feelings and work through the consequences of what you support. [limbic system darkens, frontal lobes light up] Watch how your feelings change!
Cut to voice over person:
"Vote rationally this year and nobody will be able to say..."
Cut to group of people (advertising diversity shot, so old, young, babies, all races, disabled people, poor, rich, etc.) who point and yell,
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Darcy said...
Bad vote, you!
Okay! Vote on my privates again? NO!!
BAD VOTE YOU sounds like a Psy video.
Freem, that is genius!
And haha, Aridog. Perfect.
Good news! Art Bell is going to resume his show on September 16th. I need to start training to be up all night so I can listen.
Chip Ahoy said...
Do you use many green bell peppers?
They're not ripe.
Yay! You are the first person I've ever heard agree with me on that topic.
You can ruin it now if you say you use Jalapenos green. Ripe is red.
Freeman, your magic could work for Anthony Wiener's opponent's campaign. Bad Text You!
rhhardin said...
Boobs are less important than the meme has it.
It comes from a hot babe convention in cartoons.
Every year there is a collection of two types of boobs that go to Comic Con and their pics are posted for all to see. Enjoy.
Michael Haz said...
Meth, please. People are eating dinner.
HA!!! NOM NOM NOM!!!
Michael Haz said...
Good news! Art Bell is going to resume his show on September 16th. I need to start training to be up all night so I can listen.
Yeah, but it's on sirius/xm and frankly someone or some people will start rebroadcasting it across the webs in due time.
@rh
That was kind. Thank you.
@Michael
Do I know this story? Is it the one where the chubby girl starts running? I know how it ends! =)
Darcy, it indeed ends very well! Doesn't she become a warrior princess?
Reading about living in parts of Chicago, mostly the south side. Horrible.
The false gods of post-modern society destroy everyone who becomes a follower.
Freeman Hunt said...
Bad vote, you!
Heh. That could be a campaign tagline!
Shot of man slightly tilting his head as he says, "I voted for Obama because I think he really wants to help people."
Cut to black screen with white text and voiceover, "BAD VOTE, YOU!"
Shot of a woman looking very stylish as she says, "I voted for Obama because he cares about women."
"BAD VOTE, YOU!"
***************
OMG--
That is genius!
LOL!
Our Arkansas Traveler reminds us once again that both wit and wisdom reside in the Ozarks--especially in the brain of an idiosyncratic free-thnker by the name of Freeman Hunt, You are well-named m'lady, lol.
madawaskan said...
So you don't want to believe that Romney won 56% of the white female vote?
Why do you chose to do that?
What would be CNN's reason for lying about that?
OK, what if he did win more?
According to projections made from the tallies available to the public, the Romster only needed 10 - 15% more of the white vote to win.
How much more do they admit and it looks like we've been lied to (which I think we have been)?
I'm suspicious of the whole thing - the revelations of the past few months have only added to that.
edutcher
He also won the married women vote.
In the aggregate irregardless of race. Ugh--I can't recall the exact percentage--so check me on that!
Nothing online should be excepted without question.
I just wanted to post the numbers because I think most people would be surprised.
I think Huma is working for the Muslim Brotherhood. Look at who her father was and whot her mother is.
I think the marriage was for The Cause, though Weiner didn't know it - they saw him as a rising star before they knew he had some serious public sex misbehavior issues. They are trying to keep going thinking the mayor's office, then the governor's then ... Well we all know that's not going to work, but maybe they thought it would.
JAL is spot-on here.
Unless Huma's family has disavowed her -- and they haven't -- her marriage is about power and the MB. Women from prominent MB families don't marry American Jews without repercussions. This is not "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?" Muslim Brotherhood-style.
The left meets these concerns with cries of conspiracy-thinking and McCarthyism but no substantive arguments.
For much more read Andrew McCarthy's current article at NRO.
Wow--I've got a verb tense conflict from heel going on there.
yikes.
Off for dinner--trying to cook and comment is not good.
edutcher: madawaskan's numbers sound right to me. White women voted against Obama this time. That's a separate issue from vote fraud.
Not getting your beef.
I see Chris Christie is acting like a democrat with his politix of personal destruction.
Asshole.
Hi!
Guys, we've seen enough polls that are skewed, stacked, and anything else you care to name.
Like everything else out of the media, I don't trust it.
As to this particular number, the whole "all he needed was 10 - 15% more" bit strikes me as a dodge.
Right after the "election", the numbers were a lot closer. Then another set of figures comes out making look a lot better for the Choom Gang.
Again, it's my feeling the Romster was leading and the vote fraud machine had to be cranked up. As I've said, all the revelations the last few months tend to bear that out.
YMMV.
edutcher: Nonetheless, madawskan's point, which you keep dodging, is that the majority of white women voted for Romney.
Paul called Christie "The King of Bacon."
Nice.
Nothing exists outside the universe, which, by definition, is all that which exists.
USS Indianapolis, RIP
Freeman -- You are hired.
By whom I don't know yet, but you should trade mark it and market it to ---
Paul
Cruz
Walker
Ryan
...
*Whoever* we need in the White House in 2017, so we can say "You are fired."
Kris Kristiekreme is more Taylor Ham than bacon.
ELB: What a coincidence. I just watched Jaws two nights ago.
So good.
Did someone mention Kris Kristiekreme?
" Makes me ashamed of my sex."
Just do it in the dark.
creeley23 said...
edutcher: Nonetheless, madawskan's point, which you keep dodging, is that the majority of white women voted for Romney.
I'm not ducking it, I'm just saying what if it was a bigger majority?
They give us a figure and we are expected to take it without question.
We know the Romster, according to the numbers, did well among whites and Hispanics would not have saved him.
But we're also expected to buy the idea 7 million Conservatives stayed home and 7% of Republicans went for Choom.
What if they didn't?
I'm not ducking it, I'm just saying what if it was a bigger majority?
edutcher: What if it was? That does not change the fact of madawaskan's point: the majority of white women voted for Romney.
Anthony Weiner's Campaign is Fun
creeley23 said...
I'm not ducking it, I'm just saying what if it was a bigger majority?
edutcher: What if it was? That does not change the fact of madawaskan's point: the majority of white women voted for Romney.
Fine, but I'm still saying I want somebody else's word besides a CNN exit poll.
I take their word for nothing.
There's a reason I usually put YMMV after I quote a poll, any poll.
After last year, they're all suspect.
PS He asks, "Why would they lie?".
Considering how much they've participated in the race-baiting of the last year or so, maybe it's to support story lines like the Zimmerman verdict was a whitewash because most of the jurors were typical Romney supporters.
Never fear, the reason will come out,
That earth-shaking thud you heard was Garage Mahal fainting after he read this headline:
Great outlook for Wisconsin economy
A certain blogger: "After I shut off the comments, I had to deal with email and writing on other sites, and I saw some people whom I had valued as guests griping about what I did to them, showing little appreciation for what I had given for 9 years."
Do you think she might be a wee bitter? And narcissistic...
Rh, I have read that some physicists postulate there was/is a point during the Big Bang that was/is before the existence of time. How do you know that there was/is not a point before the existence of numbers?
Evi, I agree with your 12:28 comment. I saw that and thought the same thing, but she who should not be mentioned, should not be mentioned.
Post a Comment