Flouncing is gay.
And boy, does he lay it on thick. I don't even want to type what the dope said.
Have a look. It's everywhere. Here is the Washington Times.
He thinks serving our country makes him right and people who haven't served their country don't have valid perspective of facts.
He thinks loyalty to country means its institutions cannot be corrupted by party loyalty. People like Ralph Peters are easily played by the unassailable love for the country they imagine. Their sanctimonious loyalty blinds them to abject corruption. No mention of FBI cabal protecting Hillary Clinton and no mention of that same cabal using their high office to eavesdrop on Trump illegally and then lie about it, and continue their illegal attacks after he's elected, and lie about it. And put on a completely bogus investigation to bog down and discredit. Apparently a coup d'état is just fine with Ralph Peters.
We're experiencing the result of interdepartmental corruption a magnitude of order greater than Watergate that's just beginning to be exposed Ralph Peters is right there at the confluence of information streams and he's too dense to know what is happening and what's coming up.
He's in for a very long series of discouraging revelations assailing his thick skull.
10 comments:
Is he a well know FOX analyst? Is he in the news because he’s a vet?
Peters has been making odd noises for a while, but this goes over the edge.
He seems to buy the idea that, if you served in combat and are decorated, you are beyond reproach. We can name more than a few decorated vets who became corrupted in politics, sad to say.
This would seem to have more to do with his dislike for Donald Trump than anything else.
I think he's right about several of the commentators at Fox News having made themselves shills for the Trump Administration. Well, one in particular.
Hyper emotional doofus probably already has a job at a MSM outlet so he's trashing Fox on the way out the door and claiming the moral high ground at the same time. Of course there are Trump fans at Fox and so what? They couldn't get hired anywhere else unlike this bleating establishment stooge.
He has a column out of the NY Post IIRC, which is also Murdoch-owned.
Wonder if he'd leaving that, too?
PS Padre, I think you have to remember a lot of people have been waiting a very long time to see a Republican who acts like a Republican, not a Whig or a dough-face, as they used to be called, and, yeah, a few have gone a little ga-ga (I myself have been so accused on occasion) although Hannity has always been very rah rah for anything he espouses.
I've lost all faith in Peters' pronouncements. I don't know how it happened but over time he became deep state.
How can I miss you when you're gone when I don't know who you are?
I used to work in politics, and part of my job was working with the media. I used to give interviews and provide media materials to lots of these talking heads. I saw these folks up close over several years. (No, I wasn't high profile.)
There are several things I learned. One is that a lot of these news readers and professional arguers are fluff-heads. Another is that when someone shows up on the air as an "expert," this is rarely because s/he is the most insightful person to consult, but almost always because the individual is good TV, and willing to come on the air at any hour, day or night.
When you watch these people, do not assume they have anything actually valuable to say. It's all entertainment; sometimes actual, worthwhile information is imparted.
I have read several of his Civil War novels and they are quite good.
Unfortunately he is a neocon and never saw a war he didn't want to start.
The problem is these assholes are going after Russia which is a whole different kettle of fish than Iraq or Iran or Libya.
These necons are deadly dangerous to our country. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
I think peters lost his mind or something. Or someone has something on him. I can't tell which.
Post a Comment