What's it going to be shitbird? Are you going to give me an example of Trump having the same attitudes about women that Muslims in that picture with the barefoot woman do? Or are you going to run into another thread like this and crap your way out of putting up or shutting up, you giant dried dog turd? Let's see your evidence that you have on Trump against what you said you beclowned asshole.
The strange thing about Mary the Horror's comments when they show up at Althouse is how she appears interesting and right some of the time. Befitting perhaps the picture of a functional item that looks like a gun. Or maybe a gun that functions as a phone while retaining the capacity to discharge destruction.
While the frothing and contortions she prompts over there could be considered hahahahaha laughable, Althouse does not seem to be overjoyed or enthused when that particular phone-gun comes out of the pocket. She seems to feel the intent is destruction.
COMMENTS ARE MODERATED much, but not all of the time. This is for the purpose of excluding/removing a small handful of commenters who, I believe, intend to ruin this forum. They already know who they are.
My money would be on Mead being Mary - didn't Titus used to call him Mary? And why do we give a shit about Mead, that slimy old slut bag he faux-married or who comments at her pathetic blog?
Speaking of comments, what a treat it is to awake every day knowing that April will spend the day posting hundreds of comments about how dreamy Cruz is and how much she hates Trump. That kind of "set your watch" dependability is rare these days. She wants to have little half-Cuban babies. You can see that in her words.
Speaking of Cuban, or was it Canadian, Cruz is no more eligible to be president than any of Bags' mexican slaves are. Cruz is not an American and should be disqualified from even running.
Another shitbird passive aggressive turd drop. Google? That's all you've got? You make a claim that you can't back up and when you are confronted all you can say is google it? Fuck you, you lying piece of schmeg drippings. Frankly, I never advocated that you be censured or banned or anything because I believed that you can come into this blog and get a chance at a say so, but this latest weepy cunt stunt from you pretty much removed that caveat from me.
Lem, I would like to formally request that you ban Meade from coming into this blog ever again. He neither deserves or needs to ever grace these comment sections again. I'm not joking, I'd like to see him gone once and for all.
Thank you Allen S. I'm not Mary. Meade knows that to be true as well.
I care about this blog and I care about many of the commenters who came here looking for a "comment home" after Althouse closed her comment section while entertaining the notion that her writing was the main attraction when that was only half the truth. Since then, Lem's Levity has continued to be a place where unique talents are revealed, humor and awe are enjoyed, and some unusually well formed opinions are often realized. While I don't know what's behind the dishonest and demeaning comments her husband frequently drops by to make, I wonder if jealousy or envy might be involved? I can't imagine why someone who once applied himself to washing graffiti off a stone statue would consciously and repeatedly choose to behave as he does here.
I would like to see Lem's Levity continue to thrive in an atmosphere conducive to survival and growth.
and deborah, what the heck would your curiosity about who knows what Mary looks like and how often she drives by someone's farm involve?
Have you ever known Allen S not to be a man of his word? I can't think of one instance where he's compromised his integrity or manipulated information to cause himself to be larger or smaller than he appears in the mirror of this blog or others with even more distorted reflective surfaces.
I've no need to start a blog of my own. There's a fine one available right here that daily provides me with an opportunity to read and connect with a variety of commenters who've formed a viable community similar to what used to be available at Althouse.
Meade, here's my suggestion--you could start offering contributions that reflect integrity, in place of posting remarks that demean yourself and others.
Take a look at the first 3 comments on this thread. Neither of my first 2 comments demeans anyone. But your first comment is priggish, judgmental, and negative. I don't attack anyone but I'm attacked.
I suggest you study the Science of Objectivity. Criticize yourself before you criticize others.
There you go, MamaM. In the time it took me write a civil reply to you, Methadras leaves a very demeaning comment. Silence from you. You're a very unfair self-appointed umpire, don't you agree?
There you go, Meade, projecting your impulses onto others and deflecting to judgment. I'm having difficulty believing the responses you've been making reflect your best self.
Here's the truth:
I'm not an umpire I'm not a self-appointed umpire I'm not an unfair self-appointed umpire I'm not a very unfair self-appointed umpire.
I'm someone interested in seeing this blog grow and flourish.
The behavior I'm seeing you reveal here at Lem's Levity does not appear to reflect a similar interest; in fact and pattern, it tends to match that of someone behaving as a very unfair self appointed umpire.
Take a look at the first 3 comments on this thread. Neither of my first 2 comments demeans anyone. But your first comment is priggish, judgmental, and negative. I don't attack anyone but I'm attacked.
I suggest you study the Science of Objectivity. Criticize yourself before you criticize others.
Hey fuckhead, you see me rubbing my thumb and index finger together? You know what that is, you tiny little man? That's the worlds smallest violin I'm playing at your weepy vaginal discharged whining? It's a very well practiced sentiment you portray given that this must be what's it's like in your marital dog bed.
There you go, MamaM. In the time it took me write a civil reply to you, Methadras leaves a very demeaning comment. Silence from you. You're a very unfair self-appointed umpire, don't you agree?
You must have been the child that everyone hated, always blaming others for your idiocy. WAHHHH!!! He made me do it!!! WAHHHH!!! It wasn't me it!!!! WAHHHH!!! Why can't I lick my own balls but the dog can?!?!? WAHHHH!!!!
That's the total summation of your pathetic passive aggressive existence, you estrogen filled summers eve sack. You want demeaning, then just go stand in your living room while your Chablis stained wife looks at one of your rent-a-dogs with more love and affection than you can possibly hope to garner with your mere existence. All the while thinking to herself, "I'll probably get more action out of this four legged male than i would with..." then she realizes you're there, "Oh, it's you..." and then passes out.
FWIW, Mary's a real person, and at one time I did know who she was. I figured it out from her blog years ago. No, I wasn't obsessed with her, and indeed she was one of the very, very few people I looked into, out of concern, because of some things she wrote on my long-ago defunct blog, including references to my kid and where I lived at the time. It was unsettling, to say the least. I even knew where she worked, just in case. I have no idea who MamaM is, but in all honesty, I flat out cannot imagine her being Mary. The writing and vibe is too different, and I totally can't see it as a possibility. Again, FWIW and just my opinion.
Mary also wrote some incredibly vile things over at Amba's old blog, some of the worst stuff I have ever seen, and intensely personal--with regard to Amba herself, of all people. Some longtimers here who also hung at Amba's blog might recall what I'm talking about. Whatever else I might disagree with, I totally support the rejection of Mary's comments. She's permanently on my shit-list, too.
28 comments:
I'll take 2. Maybe 3.
Trouble waiting to happen.
"Is that an iPhone in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?"
It's all 3 — It's an iPhone, a gun, AND I'm happy to see you. Overjoyed, actually.
What's it going to be shitbird? Are you going to give me an example of Trump having the same attitudes about women that Muslims in that picture with the barefoot woman do? Or are you going to run into another thread like this and crap your way out of putting up or shutting up, you giant dried dog turd? Let's see your evidence that you have on Trump against what you said you beclowned asshole.
Google, Meth.
The strange thing about Mary the Horror's comments when they show up at Althouse is how she appears interesting and right some of the time. Befitting perhaps the picture of a functional item that looks like a gun. Or maybe a gun that functions as a phone while retaining the capacity to discharge destruction.
While the frothing and contortions she prompts over there could be considered hahahahaha laughable, Althouse does not seem to be overjoyed or enthused when that particular phone-gun comes out of the pocket. She seems to feel the intent is destruction.
COMMENTS ARE MODERATED much, but not all of the time. This is for the purpose of excluding/removing a small handful of commenters who, I believe, intend to ruin this forum. They already know who they are.
MamaM, perhaps you yourself are that very M-commenter of whom you now speak.
MamaM is not Mary.
My money would be on Mead being Mary - didn't Titus used to call him Mary? And why do we give a shit about Mead, that slimy old slut bag he faux-married or who comments at her pathetic blog?
Speaking of comments, what a treat it is to awake every day knowing that April will spend the day posting hundreds of comments about how dreamy Cruz is and how much she hates Trump. That kind of "set your watch" dependability is rare these days. She wants to have little half-Cuban babies. You can see that in her words.
Speaking of Cuban, or was it Canadian, Cruz is no more eligible to be president than any of Bags' mexican slaves are. Cruz is not an American and should be disqualified from even running.
"And why do we give a shit about Mead, that slimy old slut bag he faux-married or who comments at her pathetic blog?"
Good question, Sexty. And your answer?
Meade said...
Google, Meth.
Another shitbird passive aggressive turd drop. Google? That's all you've got? You make a claim that you can't back up and when you are confronted all you can say is google it? Fuck you, you lying piece of schmeg drippings. Frankly, I never advocated that you be censured or banned or anything because I believed that you can come into this blog and get a chance at a say so, but this latest weepy cunt stunt from you pretty much removed that caveat from me.
Lem, I would like to formally request that you ban Meade from coming into this blog ever again. He neither deserves or needs to ever grace these comment sections again. I'm not joking, I'd like to see him gone once and for all.
Allen, I'd forgotten. You once said you know what Mary looks like, and she drives past your farm sometimes?
Thank you Allen S. I'm not Mary. Meade knows that to be true as well.
I care about this blog and I care about many of the commenters who came here looking for a "comment home" after Althouse closed her comment section while entertaining the notion that her writing was the main attraction when that was only half the truth. Since then, Lem's Levity has continued to be a place where unique talents are revealed, humor and awe are enjoyed, and some unusually well formed opinions are often realized. While I don't know what's behind the dishonest and demeaning comments her husband frequently drops by to make, I wonder if jealousy or envy might be involved? I can't imagine why someone who once applied himself to washing graffiti off a stone statue would consciously and repeatedly choose to behave as he does here.
I would like to see Lem's Levity continue to thrive in an atmosphere conducive to survival and growth.
and deborah, what the heck would your curiosity about who knows what Mary looks like and how often she drives by someone's farm involve?
Have you ever known Allen S not to be a man of his word? I can't think of one instance where he's compromised his integrity or manipulated information to cause himself to be larger or smaller than he appears in the mirror of this blog or others with even more distorted reflective surfaces.
"That's all you've got?"
Yep. Sorry, dude. Please don't sue me.
MamaM, I have an idea — you could start a blog of your own. And pre-ban me!
I've no need to start a blog of my own. There's a fine one available right here that daily provides me with an opportunity to read and connect with a variety of commenters who've formed a viable community similar to what used to be available at Althouse.
Meade, here's my suggestion--you could start offering contributions that reflect integrity, in place of posting remarks that demean yourself and others.
Meade said...
"That's all you've got?"
Yep. Sorry, dude. Please don't sue me.
Why would I sue you, a liar like you probably can't get enough allowance money from his drunken sot of a wife to for an Uber fare to the courthouse.
Take a look at the first 3 comments on this thread. Neither of my first 2 comments demeans anyone. But your first comment is priggish, judgmental, and negative. I don't attack anyone but I'm attacked.
I suggest you study the Science of Objectivity. Criticize yourself before you criticize others.
There you go, MamaM. In the time it took me write a civil reply to you, Methadras leaves a very demeaning comment. Silence from you. You're a very unfair self-appointed umpire, don't you agree?
There you go, Meade, projecting your impulses onto others and deflecting to judgment. I'm having difficulty believing the responses you've been making reflect your best self.
Here's the truth:
I'm not an umpire
I'm not a self-appointed umpire
I'm not an unfair self-appointed umpire
I'm not a very unfair self-appointed umpire.
I'm someone interested in seeing this blog grow and flourish.
The behavior I'm seeing you reveal here at Lem's Levity does not appear to reflect a similar interest; in fact and pattern, it tends to match that of someone behaving as a very unfair self appointed umpire.
Meade said...
Take a look at the first 3 comments on this thread. Neither of my first 2 comments demeans anyone. But your first comment is priggish, judgmental, and negative. I don't attack anyone but I'm attacked.
I suggest you study the Science of Objectivity. Criticize yourself before you criticize others.
Hey fuckhead, you see me rubbing my thumb and index finger together? You know what that is, you tiny little man? That's the worlds smallest violin I'm playing at your weepy vaginal discharged whining? It's a very well practiced sentiment you portray given that this must be what's it's like in your marital dog bed.
Meade said...
There you go, MamaM. In the time it took me write a civil reply to you, Methadras leaves a very demeaning comment. Silence from you. You're a very unfair self-appointed umpire, don't you agree?
You must have been the child that everyone hated, always blaming others for your idiocy. WAHHHH!!! He made me do it!!! WAHHHH!!! It wasn't me it!!!! WAHHHH!!! Why can't I lick my own balls but the dog can?!?!? WAHHHH!!!!
That's the total summation of your pathetic passive aggressive existence, you estrogen filled summers eve sack. You want demeaning, then just go stand in your living room while your Chablis stained wife looks at one of your rent-a-dogs with more love and affection than you can possibly hope to garner with your mere existence. All the while thinking to herself, "I'll probably get more action out of this four legged male than i would with..." then she realizes you're there, "Oh, it's you..." and then passes out.
FWIW, Mary's a real person, and at one time I did know who she was. I figured it out from her blog years ago. No, I wasn't obsessed with her, and indeed she was one of the very, very few people I looked into, out of concern, because of some things she wrote on my long-ago defunct blog, including references to my kid and where I lived at the time. It was unsettling, to say the least. I even knew where she worked, just in case. I have no idea who MamaM is, but in all honesty, I flat out cannot imagine her being Mary. The writing and vibe is too different, and I totally can't see it as a possibility. Again, FWIW and just my opinion.
Mary also wrote some incredibly vile things over at Amba's old blog, some of the worst stuff I have ever seen, and intensely personal--with regard to Amba herself, of all people. Some longtimers here who also hung at Amba's blog might recall what I'm talking about. Whatever else I might disagree with, I totally support the rejection of Mary's comments. She's permanently on my shit-list, too.
"I'm someone interested in seeing this blog grow and flourish.
The behavior I'm seeing you reveal here at Lem's Levity does not appear to reflect a similar interest"
And yet queerly, your purported interest in the health of this blog is belied by your peculiar obsessive focus on the behavior of just one commenter.
Well, Meade, to be fair, she's not exactly wild about me either, not that I haven't sometimes (though not always) given her reason.
Post a Comment