What did we learn from Benghazi hearings?

That is the search parameters.

CNN 

Think Progress

Fact Check

PBS

CBS

Think Progress

Liberals rush to the front to be heard. I don't care what they say. They're all Clinton crime syndicate fluffers. Their mouths smell of … never mind what their mouths smell of. 

America Rising pac. This sounds like fun.

• 600 requests for increased security in Libya never made it to Secretary Clinton's desk.
• emails from Sidney Blumenthal were read promptly, responded to, and disseminated.

They don't mention the name removed because Blumenthal was barred from State, so his name is removed from his recommendations directly from him, via Hillary Clinton to White House. She played her boss.

• meanwhile Ambassador Stevens did not have Hillary Clinton's email address.

They fail to note these email addresses reside on a private server, that Hillary Clintons State business is carried out illegally on the same server, the insecure server, the one not owned by State Department. Our emails on her personal server, destroyed on Hillary Clinton's whim, does not bother Democrats.

They don't mention this whole thing came about because the commission asked State for related emails and were provided with 8.

Seemed like there should be a couple thousand or so more.

Looking at Libya as a whole America Rising believes a statement made by an aide to Hillary Clinton is of some importance, the aide expressed the opinion that Libya is central to Clinton's legacy. They think this has traction. America Rising is attacking that legacy, they quote the aide with emphasis and at length and follow with links to the aide's tweets saying such.

The rest is not helpful. They are not things we learned from the hearing. Democrat bashing about Democrat panel members not being interested in pursuit of truth, rather fluffing for Hillary. We know that already. We're looking for things that are new to this hearing. That was a PAC. Not very useful. Back to search results.

WMAL
WATCH: What Did We Learn From The Benghazi Mega ...

WMAL says, two new pieces of information:

It's one thing, actually, Hillary told both her daughter (!) and an Egyptian official that the attacks were some kind of Al Qaida type group, planned, and not a spontaneous demonstration. There are two incidents, one immediate, where Hillary acknowledges the reason, two more notes on her phone about what she told an Egyptian official.

"We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest."

Boom.

This is of disqualifying importance, but not for her unserious fluffers. An American was mistreated and jailed because of Administration insistence on the importance of the video. That right there alone is disqualifying but not for Democrats. We all know that any Republican politician responsible would be politically crucified and rightfully so. This series of incidents is crucial to the issue and cannot be dismissed. The lie of the video's importance is propounded after these two recorded and recovered admissions of fact. Facts we all understood when we lived them. Even before Susan Rice entered the scene lying in series right before our marveling eyes. Later promoted, Susan Rice. We knew that we were being lied to then, we saw the liar paid off, and now here is the proof by State Department head. That cannot be dismissed, but her fluffers dismiss it.

People who insist that nothing was learned from the hearing are not paying attention. We learn that Chris Stevens does not have the email address and cannot get through to his boss about his urgent need for protection, but Sidney Blumenthal can get through on that same server used illegally as protection for Hillary Clinton believes her chief enemies are all Republicans. That is why the private server. The one Stevens cannot get to. Her own paranoia about what what her enemies could do to her based on what she knows she can do to them and does do to them along with commingling State business with Clinton Foundation business and Clinton family business on a private server so that real State business cannot penetrate is unacceptable. It is illegal. It is insecure. This is what we have learned but none of that matters to her absurd fluffers.

They don't mention that in the hearing Hillary reverts back to "believing to this day that the videos had something to do with the attack." So she exonerates herself from her own coverup. Her fluffers cannot care about anything so minor as that. They are simply not serious people.

Nobody mentions Hillary reverting between praising "security specialists for all the work they do so unassailably loyally throughout while simultaneously blaming "security specialists" for every single failure, while claiming full responsibility for everything is quite incredible. Fully responsible and fully not responsible simultaneously, that's Hillary Clinton's testimony.

The search is disappointing. I thought I'd find something more devastating all in one place. Federalist is good at that. [federalist, benghazi hearing]

Hillary is Finally Inevitable, And That's Bad News For Democrats by Robert Tracinski. Not helpful.

4 Time Sidney Blumenthal Was More Than Just a Friend to Hillary Clinton. Bre Payton.

Payton reiterates Clinton never directly corresponded via email with Stevens who requested armed reinforcements multiple times just before he was killed, she emphasizes on the 9/11 anniversary, while regularly corresponding with Blementahal [sic] about Libya affairs. Important because Blumenthal did not work for State Department, in fact was barred from working for State, so all this done surreptitiously.

Obama did not want Blumenthal to work for him, he refused to have Blumenthal serve under his administration. Blumenthal is too hot, too corrupted even for Obama. Obama said, "No to Blumenthal."

Hillary used him as advisor.

Blumenthal had personal business in Libya.

Blumenthal also sent Hillary intelligence reports on Libya that were forwarded to White House after removing his name.

This we learned from the Benghazi hearing. Democrats and media fluffers are too silly to care about any of this.

Bre, numbered her points.

1) Blumenthal asked for too many favors.

2) Blumenthal was getting paid to be their friend.

3) Blumenthal advised Hillary Clinton a lot.

4) Clinton paid more attention to Blumenthal emails than the safety of Americans.

Nice. Bree is staff writer at the Federalist. Follow her on Twitter if you like. 

Not that it does any good for anyone, not that it helps, but these dots and numbers are the talking points that come spilling out when provoked, quietly with assured confidence silent karate chops that slash twice as thoroughly and twice up in their face when provoked. That will be two quiet and devastating and disqualifying points for every silly fluffer point made.

Good for moments like this. The sound is on the t.v. Fox being what they are invited a Hillary fluffer to present his point of view. Viewers are treated to his cheerful effluence, Republicans bad, did we know that Marco Rubio is actually fundraising on this? Shameful! GOP did Hillary the biggest of all favors, such glee all around did you see her endure the drilling? How presidential. How marvelous. Her composure? She didn't loose it all day!

We saw smirking and rolling of eyes, cutting of eyes, boredom and disrespect all around we saw the confidence and impatience of all her deaf and blind fluffers.

He continues, Look at the polls, look at the numbers. Look at the numbers, he repeats. We're expecting worthwhile valuable numbers, but no, we're provided inconsequential numbers instead. Numbers without any substance, devoid of all meaning, the number of times the term, "email" was used during the session, the number of times "server" was used, the number of times "Benghazi" was used, the precise number of the instances words being used as some type of demonstration of meaninglessness to GOP and usefulness to Hillary Clinton. The numbers the fluffer enthused over have nothing to do with Hillary Clinton's prospects as candidate for president far less anything to do with discovering and uncovering Hillary Clinton's malfeasance. The numbers sheer misdirection for important numbers like % of people who still believe this lying Halloween witch and the % of potential Democrat voters now discouraged to vote this time around because Hillary Clinton sucked all the oxygen that remains to her asthmatic moribund long suffering fluffed up Party. Behavior they would not tolerate from any Republican. Not any. Not one. Not ever. Were it known.

Nobody mentions the whole idea is keep Hillary talking and talking and talking as prosecutors do. They've already uncovered multiple instances of contradiction in testimony. Anyone who lived through the original Watergate with Hillary Clinton center stage prosecuting will recall what a drag all that was on the psyche on a National level, for so long, the antagonists reveling in every new juicy tidbit wringing and wrenching the thing endlessly desultorily mangling the liquid to dry E empty of fumes, literally endlessly. They still talk about that smashing success with glowing warmth and now is the time to return it most certainly.