They dispute Republican claims that FBI and DOJ relied on unverified Steele dossier to obtain the FISA warrant and also failed to disclose it was funded by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC. (Without mentioning why FISA Judge Rudolph Contratas was forcefully recused, not self-recuised as we were told)
Democrats also claim the FISAs against Page allowed FBI to collect valuable intelligence, that portion of their evidence is largely redacted. They rebut Republican claim that FBI and DOJ omitted material facts about Steele in th eFISA applications. (Saying so doesn't make it so, they're lying again.)
Nobody sensible believes a single doodle.
House Republicans Release Rebuttal To Democratic Intel Memo
Republican rebuttal to Democrat rebuttal concentrates on ignored and omitted information notably Michael Isikoff's Yahoo News article, Christopher Steele's credibility, Hillary campaign and the DNC. They say the Democrat memo is unpersuasive and attempts to distract from the Committee's key findings. They say the heavily redacted details supposedly corroborating the Steele dossier leaves many questions.
More interesting than all this Democrat hogwash that works only on Democrat dummkopfs is Devin Nunes speaking at CPAC who makes universal sense. Well worth your time.
3 comments:
The Left is running on empty.
They planned their response and waited for a school massacre. Now it's all coming apart to the point Gateway's asking if the 4 deputies were ordered to stand down?
They jumped into action the second Podesta floated his idea to steal the election.
But both plans hit broken on the truth.
PS Where's Waldo, Chip?
I like how the Republicans bookended their memo. Now what will the Democrats do, write a rebuttal rebuttal rebuttal? I hope they do.
LOL. Chip does it again.
Post a Comment