Tuesday, June 23, 2015

"Hostage Review Will Make It Easier for Families to Pay Ransoms"

"The White House is about to change how Washington tries to save captured Americans"
The shift, which was first reported Monday by Foreign Policy, will be detailed Wednesday as part of the administration’s long-awaited review of U.S. hostage policy, according to two government officials and others familiar with the matter. The White House launched the probe last year after coming under fierce criticism for failing to do more to bring back missing American journalists James Foley and Steven Sotloff, and aid worker Peter Kassig, all three of whom were beheaded by the Islamic State. Three other Americans — journalist Luke Somers in Yemen, and aid workers Kayla Mueller in Syria and Warren Weinstein on the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan — have since been killed while in militant custody.

In a statement Tuesday, Warren Weinstein’s widow called her family’s interaction with the government “inconsistent at best, and utterly disappointing” during more than three years of his captivity. Elaine Weinstein offered lukewarm praise for the creation of a fusion center but said the White House should have more oversight of the process.

“We hope to be the last family that fails to receive the level of coordinated government support that those who serve abroad deserve when trouble finds them,” Elaine Weinstein said.

When it publicly releases the results Wednesday, the administration will reiterate that the U.S. government itself will not negotiate with, or pay ransoms to, terrorist groups. The so-called “no concessions” policy has been in place for decades and is a key difference between how Washington and its European allies deal with captured citizens. Many key American allies, including Germany, Italy, and Spain, freely admit to paying money to militants to bring back their hostages. The United States, by contrast, believes that ransom payments would encourage kidnappers to grab more Americans.
This is crazy.

9 comments:

AllenS said...

Here's some big crazy:

Returned home and had a phone message telling me that the IRS was suing me and to call 206 201 2078 for information about the case file.

SCAM!

Dad Bones said...

It was probably ISIS, AllenS. They won't bother you if you send them some money. Otherwise they'll kidnap you (I'm trying to stick to the subject) and try to get the money from Obama.

Leland said...

When you provide incentives, you encourage the activity.

But that's just a bumper sticker statement. This is just another handout to the insurance industry, which is in the "what have you done for me" mode since Obamacare forced all Americans to buy insurance (and not healthcare). International corporations have been dealing with this all decade. Ships will be captured and crew made into hostages. A company ponies up the ransom demand, and then files an insurance claim, to the insurer who jacks up the next premiums. The terrorist get richer, the corporations are out the premiums, but all is transferred to the consumer who gets poorer. So now ex-Pat Americans will need to carry insurance to cover the possibility of kidnapping and their family needing to pay insurance. Failure to pay will mean certain death, while paying will mean possible death. Caveat for members of the Progressive faith, as they will have allies in the State Department that will glady trade enemy combatants for their freedom, so no insurance necessary.

AllenS said...

You could kidnap me. I'd bet my friends could come up with a hundred bucks. So, no problem.

What if ISIS kidnapped Hillary!? I doubt if Bill would pay anything.

There's your disincentive.

edutcher said...

Be funny if IS told people, no, we only take hard currency.

None of that Yellen paper.

chickelit said...

Can the US Government tax ransom payments? That might explain the change in policy.

chickelit said...

It's just another form of wealth transfer.

chickelit said...

It could also be seen as reparations--if you belong to the wright church...

Leland said...

The government can tax the income made by the insurance company premiums.