A major publisher of scholarly medical and science articles has retracted 43 papers because of “fabricated” peer reviews amid signs of a broader fake peer review racket affecting many more publications.The Chinese PLA is known to engage in cyber warfare against the United States.
The publisher is BioMed Central, based in the United Kingdom, which puts out 277 peer-reviewed journals. A partial list of the retracted articles suggests most of them were written by scholars at universities in China, including China Medical University, Sichuan University, Shandong University and Jiaotong University Medical School. But Jigisha Patel, associate editorial director for research integrity at BioMed Central, said it’s not “a China problem. We get a lot of robust research of China. We see this as a broader problem of how scientists are judged.”
Could fraudulent "peer review" papers be part of that effort? or Am I connecting one too many dots?
6 comments:
"Consensus"
Consensus say: "Man who slip through airport turnstile sideways surely going to Bangkok"
I think a bigger scandal is the number of false leads published regarding new blockbuster drugs. In the old days, these discoveries were made in company labs and weren't published -- they were quickly buried because companies were only interested in funding winners and not losers, Nowadays, publishing duds shows evidence of activity and garners more research dollars.
I'm going to assume that the PLA is better at prosecuting a false flag operation than that.
Peer review: the equivalent of jacket blurbs on books.
Money makes the world go round and people lie.
See cholesterol drugs aka statins. Billions of reasons. The best peer review money can buy.
They kill trust and wonder why no one takes their advice anymore. Its science man! What are you, a flat earther! Science!
Post a Comment