Monday, October 14, 2013

“We’d make music together”

WASHINGTON — In January 2010, just one year into his presidency, President Obama traveled from the White House to Capitol Hill to deliver his first State of the Union address. Health care was being debated, Republican Scott Brown had just been elected senator from Massachusetts, and the economy remained sluggish.

With his presidency already at a crossroads, Obama returned to a theme that had guided his political career: He admonished both parties for their divisiveness, urged them to work together, and said he hadn’t given up on trying to change the corrosive tone of the country’s politics.

In fact, he said, he wanted to begin meeting monthly with Republican and Democratic leaders to “show the American people that we can do it together.”

“I know you can’t wait,” he added, as members of Congress laughed.
 
But wait they did.

His first one-on-one meeting with the top Republican in the House, John Boehner, did not come for another year and a half. In nearly five years in office, Obama has met individually with Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell two times, according to a review of White House visitor logs, pool reports, and press releases. Obama did initially hold regular meetings with other members of the congressional leadership; after several months those sessions became sporadic.

Obama’s talk of uniting the nation often has not translated into, to use military parlance, “boots on the ground.” He has visited Democrat-leaning “blue” states six times more often than he has visited Republican “red” states. He has staffed much of his administration with people who grew up in blue states. None of his major legislative accomplishments — the stimulus, health care, and financial reforms — received more than six Republican votes.

In sum, one of the biggest failures of Obama’s presidency is that, five years after he took office vowing to close the partisan divide, the capital he now oversees and the country he represents are far more divided than they were before he came.

Boston Globe

53 comments:

sakredkow said...

Yes, none of this seems to bode well for our immediate future. I suppose it could turn out okay but it doesn't seem likely. It would require unprecedented leadership to turn this into a win for the USA.

chickelit said...

It would require unprecedented leadership to turn this into a win for the USA.

Steven Spielberg assured us that this will happen.
_____________________

I think some of his early cabinet disappointments helped do him in. It's not all his fault.

Plus, he should have focussed on helping recover the economy instead of hindering it further. Postponing the employer mandate is tacit admission of that.

If Dems were smart, they'd go along with a postponement of the individual mandate as well. It's not clear that more people will sign up for coverage than will be hit by the IRS in April 2014.

edutcher said...

As he was the most partisan member of the Senate (remember, this includes Harry Reid), should anyone be surpised?

As El Rushbo said, "Everything Barack Obama says has an expiration date".

sakredkow said...

Don't get me wrong. I put 80% of this at the feet of the Tea Party.

Birches said...

I can't believe this article came from the Globe. Wow.

Our next Executive must have actual executive experience.

Calypso Facto said...

I put 80% of this at the feet of the Tea Party.

I laugh every time I see this nonsensical meme of blaming the minority for the failures of the majority.

sakredkow said...

I laugh every time I see this nonsensical meme of blaming the minority for the failures of the majority.

I can respect that you disagree with it but it goes beyond a meme I think.

Birches said...

Don't get me wrong. I put 80% of this at the feet of the Tea Party.

I find it interesting that the article mentioned Boehner's opposition to the stimulus as a douse of cold water. There is a disconnect with this administration and regular people. The stimulus proves it. Boehner didn't oppose the stimulus because he hated Obama. He opposed the stimulus because he (and the rest of the congressional delegation) got an earful on TARP. TARP passed because everyone was too scared not to, but afterwards I think many felt duped. They weren't going to go through with another boondoggle. Thus, the birth of the Tea Party. Perhaps if Obama had listened to why the opposition was opposing, he might have learned how to compromise. However, by keeping his tin ear, he only allowed the Tea Party to grow stronger.

Congress might have a lot of issues, but one thing they've proven again and again. They know when they're constituents are pissed and will make sure they aren't on the wrong side.

sakredkow said...

Plausible argument, Birches.

Birches said...

their constituents --- must proofread better next time. . .

Known Unknown said...

Thus, the birth of the Tea Party.

The Tea Party precedent was set prior to Obama's election in 2008. PorkBusters was a thing during Bush's tenure, remember?

chickelit said...

However, by keeping his tin ear, he only allowed the Tea Party to grow stronger.

Obama grew the Tea Party and nurtured it, as sure as Coulomb's Law or Newton's Third Law. Perhaps that's why he feels obliged to label it. He hasn't gone the extra mile that certain bloggers have: labeling it the "New Confederacy" -- but who knows what he really thinks?

chickelit said...

The Tea Party precedent was set prior to Obama's election in 2008. PorkBusters was a thing during Bush's tenure, remember?

When has Obama ever spoken out against pork?

john said...

Grand Canyon NP has been reopened, as of 2 days ago. The state gave the park superintendent a check for $400,000 and some businesses just outside the main gate gave another $400,000, in a surprise ceremony on Saturday.

This bit of cooperation should help reduce the bad feelings, as well as help the pocketbooks of the employees and concessionaires. Hopefully, the money can stay here instead of being sent to DC.

Known Unknown said...

INSANITY!

Buzzfeed actually made me laugh.

Calypso Facto said...

Obama fails to meet with Republicans Boehner or McConnell, fails to visit red states to sell his initiatives, fails to get (or even try for, really) more than 6 total Republican votes on any of his "major legislative accomplishments" and yet you (Phx) somehow blame the Tea Party for all of this, going out of your way to prove the versatility of the popular "it's the Tea Party's fault" meme, by applying it even where there's no clear, and certainly no controlling, Tea Party involvement.

Known Unknown said...

When has Obama ever spoken out against pork?

Pulled pork is delicious.

sakredkow said...

The important thing is that people who can still talk and negotiate with their opponents in good will need to earnestly look for those opportunities. Bipartisanship and compromise.

Think of a successful marriage and how you don't always get what you want and you learn to curb your tongue from time to time.

sakredkow said...

even where there's no clear, and certainly no controlling, Tea Party involvement.

Their involvement has been somewhat apparent in the last few weeks. If you look hard you can see.

Known Unknown said...

The important thing is that people who can still talk and negotiate with their opponents in good will need to earnestly look for those opportunities. Bipartisanship and compromise.

Unfortunately, at this point, it feels like re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Known Unknown said...

Their involvement has been somewhat apparent in the last few weeks. If you look hard you can see.

Boehner is a die-hard TP-er, fer sure.



Known Unknown said...

When has Obama ever spoken out against pork?

People and press who speak as if Obama's election suddenly spawned the Tea Party need to do their homework.

chickelit said...

People and press who speak as if Obama's election suddenly spawned the Tea Party need to do their homework.

Of course the Tea Party was Bush's fault. But Obama put it on steroids. Isn't it self-evident?

Known Unknown said...


Of course the Tea Party was Bush's fault. But Obama put it on steroids. Isn't it self-evident?


Pssst ... we agree.

Just reacting to the Globe article.

sakredkow said...

even where there's no clear, and certainly no controlling, Tea Party involvement.

It is amazing how the House Rs have been lockstep behind him.

sakredkow said...

Unfortunately, at this point, it feels like re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

I still think people like you and I have to try.

chickelit said...

I think the left needs to equate the Tea Party with racism because they recognize that it has grown under Obama but need a reason. To them, the Tea Party must be a reaction to something Obama is rather than some things he does.

Known Unknown said...

It is amazing how the House Rs have been lockstep behind him.

Maybe it's not just the Tea Party that is opposed to Obamacare.

Known Unknown said...

I still think people like you and I have to try.


It's not going to be our problem to solve

Trooper York said...

Phx maybe you would negotiate. Obama will not. He is an arrogant prick who never passed a bill with wide bi-partisan support.

He could end the crisis right now. The Speaker and Rhinos are dying to help him. He just has to give a little as President facing a debt ceiling problem like Clinton and Bush had done before him. He can easily pick enough Rhinos to put a fig leaf on it.

But he won't. He will not give an inch. The Speaker can't call the vote because he would be out of a job the next day.

So it is all going to blow up.

It has to get a lot worse before it gets better.

Trooper York said...

The only way it is going to end is if Rhinos like Senator Sowne and the Speaker bend over and give him what he wants.

If the current deal happens it will only go until February 2014 and then he will have to face a new Speaker.

Birches said...

Of course the Tea Party was Bush's fault. But Obama put it on steroids. Isn't it self-evident?

TARP happened on W's watch. I think its a factor in McCain's loss, because even conservatives were upset with the status quo.

Anyone venture into the comments at the Globe? New Confederacy was all over the place. When people talk about the unprecedented opposition to Obama, I find myself wondering if they're young college students who don't remember the 90s. The Republicans hated Bill Clinton so much they impeached him. I think he might win the unprecedented opposition award.

chickelit said...

But he won't. He will not give an inch.

He was the same way about insisting on attacking Syria and had to be talked down from the ledge. The ego is strong with that one.

Trooper York said...

Syria was a perfect example. Even when most of his own party was against him he was sure he was right. Luckily wiser heads prevailed.

It won't happen this time. He thinks he is winning. So we will go over the cliff because he will not negotiate with people that were also elected to represent their constituents.

Trooper York said...

A deal is there if he wants it. The Rhinos will betray the Republican caucus in the House. A fig leaf or two will get her done.

The debt will get bigger. The government will come back and waste more money. Obamacare will go forward and be a miserable failure just as the sign up process has proved to be.

Trooper York said...

The Democrats will just blame Bush.

JAL said...

Quelle surprise!

JAL said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
JAL said...

They know when they're constituents are pissed and will make sure they aren't on the wrong side.

You know, I think it may be too late to get on their right side. That should have happened months -- no, a couple years -- ago when this travesty of rule by fiat stuck up its ugly head.

Out with them that were there and covered their eyes, ears and mouths. Be gone.

"We the People" matters.

Chip Ahoy said...

Do not come wiz me to ze casbah -- we shall make beautiful musicks togezer right 'ere. But what iz this? Oh, but of course ze little one wish to commit suicide to prove her love for me. What a sweet gesture. Nevertheless, I must prevent zat. It is the little girl in her, no? She likes to play ze game of chase. Ze little love bundle. She is now seeking for us a trysting place. Touching, is it not? Come, mon petit peanut of brittle. I will help you. Wait for me. Wait.

Hagar said...

It is what "community organizers" do. No surprise there.

I'm Full of Soup said...

He is not a smart man - he is a vindicative, resentful person who wants to change America drastically so his priorities are not the priorities most of us would have chosen to help the economy.

I'm Full of Soup said...

It is curious Obama has never written anything of note except his autobios - he is either too lazy or incapable of it.

AllenS said...

Well, if Obama wasn't vindictive and resentful, he'd have nothing.

Aridog said...

EMD said...

Buzzfeed actually made me laugh.

Me too. But for a different reason I'd guess: note the addition to the closure statements now..."except for 1st Amendment activities."

Now that's funny.

Aridog said...

EMD said...

People and press who speak as if Obama's election suddenly spawned the Tea Party need to do their homework.

You got that right. The basic concept of the Tea Party Movement began in the early 1970's with the early Libertarians. They objected to taxation and one of my next door neighbors went to prison for his actions...he was one of the leaders of the group that entered 99 for dependent exemptions on their W4's. You can thank him for the requirement now that if you enter 10 or more dependents on your W4 you must prove it with documentation to your employer...and the IRS.

Aridog said...

phx said...

The important thing is that people who can still talk and negotiate with their opponents in good will need to earnestly look for those opportunities.

Great idea. You haven't listened to Harry Reid or Barack Obama much lately, I gather. :)

I never thought I'd get to the point where I missed LBJ, but it has happened. Obama has mimicked only LBJ's mistakes and none of his virtues.

A more untutored fool would be impossible to elect.

chickelit said...

A more untutored fool would be impossible to elect.

Careful there Aridog. You're treading on their "Doctrine Of Executive Infallibility."

I'm Full of Soup said...

Aridog - that is a great line.

Aridog said...

El Pollo Raylan .... I suspect Obama has subscribed to that doctrine. However, I really have come to believe he is merely an ignorant untutored stooge groomed by the party (as reconfigured from 1968) from 2004 onward to be the figurehead they've always wanted.

rcocean said...

The first executive position Obama has held is President. He's been a partisan lefty his whole life - listening to Rev "Goddamn America" Wright in church, and getting Bill Ayres to write his books.

His behavior is unsurprising. In O's defense, there's no reason for him to meet one-on-one with Mitch McDumbhead. Except for Cruz, the Senate R's wanted to surrender before the fight began.

Michael Haz said...

I can't believe this article came from the Globe. Wow.


The Globe may have written the article in praise of Obama. Just sayin'.

Tea Party, Tea Party, Tea Party. Notice how the Globe and others control the spin with that phrase? Never is there an offsetting mention of the same kind of activism form the far left. Organizing for America? Seldom mentioned. SEIU? Rarely mentioned. Yet both groups worked vigorously to help Obama get elected, and to carry out his progressive agenda.

It ain't the Girl Scouts being paid to enroll Americans in ObamaCare, it's OFA operatives, who are also registering ObamaCare enrollees to vote.

Whatever the MSM says, believe the opposite.

Aridog said...

OFA....is it odd that a campaign committee morphs into a 501 (c)(4) in less than one month by promising to spend less than 50% of its revenues on political activities? [giggle, snort, ach...]

Application to certification less than 30 days in January 2013.

Bwahahahaha.