Friday, September 6, 2013

“Every bit of info it gets is gold.”

"Google attorneys argued in a California court Thursday that the company needs to systematically read every email sent through its mail system. Scanning email is simply part of the business."
“[Email] providers like Google must scan the emails sent to and from their systems as part of providing their services,” reads a supporting document filed by the Internet giant in the case. “The automated processes at issue are Google’s ordinary business practices implemented as part of providing the free Gmail service to the public.”
Privacy advocates beg to differ.
“They’re also collecting information about their users for other purposes,” Consumer Watchdog president Jamie Court told FoxNews.com. He and other privacy advocates argue that e-mail scanning isn't technically necessary -- only fiscally.
“It’s not just for spam [filtering]. It’s clearly for advertising,” he said.
“Every bit of info it gets is gold.”

In a post about a study in potential deceptive texting, Professor William Jacobson, of Legal Insurrection, linked to an article that also embedded a TED Talk video, where I learned something interesting about email and lying.
Let's focus on the conversations between our friends and our family and our coworkers and our loved ones. Those are the conversations that really matter. What does technology do to deception with those folks?
Here's a couple of studies. One of the studies we do are called diary studies, in which we ask people to record all of their conversations and all of their lies for seven days, and what we can do then is calculate how many lies took place per conversation within a medium, and the finding that we get that surprises people the most is that email is the most honest of those three media. And it really throws people for a loop because we think, well, there's no nonverbal cues, so why don't you lie more? The phone, in contrast, the most lies. Again and again and again we see the phone is the device that people lie on the most, and perhaps because of the Butler Lie ambiguities I was telling you about. This tends to be very different from what people expect. 
The talk offers some clues as to why Google is so interested in scanning Google e-mail.

Here's is video After the jump




14 comments:

Meade said...

Liar.

The Dude said...

Yes you are. Still groovin' to Crack's crap?

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

Im assuming google is aware of the studies.

edutcher said...

Well, they've sold out to Red China. Why not do it here?

chickelit said...

Lyre.

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

Complimenting on a post like this one is impossible.

Nice pics Meade.

chickelit said...

Nice pics Meade.

Thank goodness it was just pics and not pics of pecs. The fawning and sighs would have never ceased.

Aridog said...

Lem said...

Complimenting on a post like this one is impossible.

No, it isn't. I was just about to do so when I saw the other comments. Why bother, eh?

Nice pics Meade.

That's a lie, Lem...Meade posted a video clip, not pictures, unless you mean "moving pictures."

Dust Bunny Queen said...

It’s not just for spam [filtering]. It’s clearly for advertising

Big surprise. I often wonder what they (the people who are sending out the ads) must think of me.

In the last few months I have researched and bought some of the following: vintage Vespa scooters, ammunition and ordered some snake loads for the 22 rifle and a replacement stock for the 12 gauge shot gun, heated cat bed for the feral cat who has decided that we are his people, yarn, vintage travel trailers, melamine dinnerware again vintage, digital cameras and SLR cameras, steering wheels for 1972 Blazers, Worcestershire sauce from England and anchovy stuffed olives on the advice of Palladian, recipes for pears (we have a ton this year), class 3 or 4 trailer hitches (do we need to upgrade?), pressure canner pressure regulator part (lost the little sucker), a book about prehistoric settlement of America from Europe, and shallots for planting this fall in the raised bed garden.

If I get tired of the advertising being hub caps or car parts, I google birds or flowers or yarn so the ads are pretty and colorful.

Some of the above may be lies....or not.

Aridog said...

When it comes to mediums of communication, at lot can be observed "between the lines" so to speak. I just received a questionnaire from the National Republican Party. It immediately asks if I am....(among other things I forget, since I tore it up and pitched it out)...

o Conservative GOP
o Independent, leaning GOP
o Social moderate GOP
o Tea Party Member
o etc. etc.

WTF? Really? I have to chose between Conservative and Tea Party? Can't be both? Bullshit!

These guys can go fuck off with their internally sponsored divisions. Oh, they also asked for a sum between $25 and $1000 at this time.

Sho' nuff, y'all hold your breath waiting for my check, um-kay.

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

I said impossible because i assumed this post includes the possibility of priming. The post is not conducive to certain kind of commenting, in other words.
Im working today. Sorry i wont be able to post anew untill late afternoon.

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

Silver lining... the email scans will get better / truer data than the other two formats.
Forward.

Meade said...

Thanks, Lem.

Aridog said...

Not a good sing...a v-e-r-y good thread subject, a dual subject actually, goes dead in under three hours. WTF is wrong here?

Must be me.

Or not.