Well, there will alway be someone.
My day's roaming started poorly. A British site deep in the comments embedded a video of some down ticket Republican politician saying something dumb about gay marriages. Or something. You'd have to watch to know. That something so lame was posted so distant to smear so lamely bent me out of shape right off. Causing me to return more harshly than I care to.
And scanning the polurls to see how blue/purple/red concerns sorted. I notice that blue is deeply concerned with some error Bill O'Reilly made, something about no Republicans being invited to some 50th anniversary confab, all down the line in each publication there was some item or two things about that. But purple and red didn't even notice it or did not remark. Odd, it is only one television show, and blue doesn't watch that show, they turn it off in disgust yet the obsession is widespread, so whatever they know they received, and the people who do watch had nothing to say, they are talking about more serious things.
And it's all such a drag.
Volokh writes it is hard day for distinguishing between satirical pieces from the real ones and presents two examples. First the Slate piece on being a bad person if you send your kids to private school, and second, the New Yorker piece Obama promises Syria strike with no objective.
The commenters at Volokh, bless 'em, provide another New Yorker Piece about Christie being booted from GOP primary consideration due to his empathy display.
If that were not bad enough, the links to other New Yorker stories are even more ridiculous that two already mentioned. Another fixation with Fox, something about their "don't come to Jesus moment", now who could resist clicking that obsession? Paula Dean's ugly roots. Satire or what? She's from Georgia. She's old. Will the piece condemn the old South and ignore everything lovely about the woman, or is it more satire? I'd have to read the whole thing to know. And finally Why the GOP needs to lose for a third time with a picture of Bush. It must be satire.
They're not done in Volokh's comments. The onion is mentioned. But it is a serious piece about limited options, not the satire you might have already read linked at Ace's about the range of options being from a limited bomb strike to a limited bomb strike. I found that very amusing. It is a form I use to describe someone's acting range. From screaming to screaming, while holding out my arms as if screaming were a broad range in itself.
And the Daily Show. But that is a video that comes with an advert, and eh, Jon Stewart.
And finally wikipedia, and that is where I learned Poe not being the poet.
And I realized how depressing all that is. How it is not me at all, how much out of character I come just to process it and address it, how I dislike it a lot. And that is the straw, when two grievances coincided, the one single comment left on one of those final links used the word "allot." That did it.
And all that roaming around
The net foreign webs and You Tubes
The finest thing I found
Turns out to be Two Diva's boobs
I watched all of them. ALL of them. They are so worth the time spent. Then, some of the large breasted women who appeared on the show upload their own videos, and they're even better in their own videos. The comments on the one woman's page are so full of love and warmth and true affection.
Ture.
Even the video about bread-feeding bras. Ew. Nobody wants to watch that one. Not any comments. Too bad. It is a really hot woman who wants a hot bra not the ridiculously ugly utilitarian wet nurse bras. She shows it so you know what she's talking about. And it makes you realize, wow, what a drag to be stuck with such ugly bras if that's what you had to wear. And the shopkeeper says, "Any bra can be turned into a nursing bra." Then fits the lady with a really hot bra, and you and she and the shopkeeper all glee and dance at once, hurray! A hot bra!
The View. I know. But it is a very good separate interview without the usual lineup. Two parts, this is the second part. The more useful, I think, but they're both good.
I love these two women. I love their television show. I love the enthusiastic girl who works there, and the things she has to learn. The whole thing is wonderful.
Through all of this I leaned. And I must agree, honestly, this goes without saying, you would have to have a really good fitting bra for each day of the week at least, That is how guys think. But even that is only one week supply. I am not comfortable with less than thirty. A month. Because I do not like to do laundry. That is my plan for laundry avoidance, and it's a very good system that works. That would apply to bras too if I had to wear those.
One episode showed them making a new ad. Wonderfully zany and self-deprecating and loving and fun. It leaves with the impression the result was bolloxed but the advert on YouTube looks very nice to me, not at all resembling what was shown. One commenter there:
